This site uses cookie tracking technologies. Learn more in our Cookie Policy.
Browse top scoring exemplars of IB Biology IA with SL/HL samples, examiner-style feedback, criteria breakdowns, and real student Internal Assessment exemplars.
19 minute read
34 minute read
34 minute read
4 minute read
6 minute read
18 minute read
10 minute read
12 minute read
1 minute read
10 minute read
10 minute read
The grader works in two modes:
| Mark Band | What It Means | Evidence You Must Show |
|---|---|---|
| 5–6 | Comprehensive and well-justified research design. | Clear research question, thorough background, detailed methodology, and control of variables. |
| 3–4 | Adequate research design with some justification. | Research question and methodology present but lacking depth or clarity. |
| 1–2 | Limited research design with minimal justification. | Unclear research question, insufficient methodology, and poor control of variables. |
| 0 | No relevant research design presented. | Absent or entirely inappropriate research question and methodology. |
| Mark Band | What It Means | Evidence You Must Show |
|---|---|---|
| 5–6 | Thorough and accurate data analysis with clear interpretation. | Comprehensive data collection, appropriate processing, and insightful interpretation. |
| 3–4 | Adequate data analysis with some interpretation. | Sufficient data collection and processing with basic interpretation. |
| 1–2 | Limited data analysis with minimal interpretation. | Insufficient data collection, poor processing, and superficial interpretation. |
| 0 | No relevant data analysis presented. | Absent or entirely inappropriate data collection and processing. |
| Mark Band | What It Means | Evidence You Must Show |
|---|---|---|
| 5–6 | Well-supported conclusions addressing the research question. | Clear linkage between data analysis and conclusions with biological context. |
| 3–4 | Conclusions addressing the research question with some support. | Basic linkage between data analysis and conclusions. |
| 1–2 | Limited conclusions with minimal support. | Weak linkage between data analysis and conclusions. |
| 0 | No relevant conclusions presented. | Absent or entirely inappropriate conclusions. |
| Mark Band | What It Means | Evidence You Must Show |
|---|---|---|
| 5–6 | Comprehensive evaluation with well-justified improvements. | Detailed analysis of strengths, limitations, and realistic improvements. |
| 3–4 | Adequate evaluation with some justified improvements. | Basic analysis of strengths, limitations, and improvements. |
| 1–2 | Limited evaluation with minimal improvements. | Superficial analysis of strengths, limitations, and improvements. |
| 0 | No relevant evaluation presented. | Absent or entirely inappropriate evaluation. |
If you're between bands, focus on Criterion B (Data Analysis) and Criterion D (Evaluation) - these often offer the biggest improvement opportunities.
IB Biology IA grade boundaries vary by session but your IA contributes significantly to your final grade:
| IB Grade | Typical Mark Range (out of 25) | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | 22-24 | 88-100% |
| 6 | 19-21 | 76-84% |
| 5 | 16-18 | 64-72% |
| 4 | 13-15 | 52-60% |
| 3 | 10-12 | 40-48% |
| 2 | 7-9 | 28-36% |
| 1 | 0-6 | 0-24% |
Get annotated suggestions, strengths, and actionable feedback for your work.
View your feedback in the context of the subject rubric and broken down by criteria strands.
All files are deleted within 48 hours. We do not train on your data.