An MYP Physics report card normally shows achievement in four science criteria, each assessed on a 0--8 scale. Many schools also report an overall subject grade from 1--7, teacher feedback, and indicators such as Approaches to Learning, effort, or attendance.
MYP assessment is criterion-related. The report describes how well a student meets defined standards rather than ranking students or converting every task into a simple percentage average.
What appears on an MYP Physics report card?
Although layouts vary, a report commonly includes:
- Achievement levels for Criteria A, B, C, and D
- A criterion total out of 32, where used
- An overall MYP subject grade from 1--7, where required by school policy
- Teacher comments, strengths, and improvement targets
- Approaches to Learning, effort, attendance, or conduct indicators
The IB requires schools to communicate achievement regularly, but it does not prescribe one universal report-card layout. Schools make local decisions about reporting periods, percentages, effort grades, and presentation. Families should therefore consult the school's current assessment and reporting policy.
The four MYP Physics assessment criteria
Physics uses the four MYP sciences criteria. The official IB MYP sciences subject brief explains that the criteria are equally weighted.
| Criterion | Focus | Physics example |
|---|---|---|
| A: Knowing and understanding | Explaining and applying scientific knowledge | Applying Newton's laws or calculating electrical power |
| B: Inquiring and designing | Formulating questions, hypotheses, variables, and methods | Designing an investigation into pendulum period |
| C: Processing and evaluating | Processing data, concluding, and evaluating methods | Graphing force against extension and evaluating uncertainty |
| D: Reflecting on the impacts of science | Evaluating scientific applications and implications | Assessing the environmental and economic effects of nuclear power |
Each criterion has achievement levels from 0 to 8, with descriptor bands of 1--2, 3--4, 5--6, and 7--8. A level of 0 means the available evidence does not reach a standard described by the rubric.
Each criterion also contains several strands. Completing one strand well, such as drawing an accurate graph, does not guarantee a high Criterion C level if interpretation, conclusion, or evaluation is missing. Teachers select the descriptor that best represents the work as a whole.
How an MYP Physics grade is calculated
Tasks provide criterion evidence
Different assessments can target different criteria. A concept test may emphasize Criterion A, an investigation may assess B and C, and an evaluation of renewable energy may assess D. A single task does not need to assess all four criteria.
Teachers gather evidence across the reporting period and judge it against published descriptors. The resulting level represents the quality of demonstrated performance, not merely the percentage of questions answered correctly.
Teachers use best-fit judgment
If a student earns Criterion A levels of 4, 5, and 6, the reported result is not automatically the arithmetic mean of 5. The teacher considers the consistency, recency, complexity, and quality of the evidence.
A level of 6 may be appropriate when recent work consistently meets the 5--6 descriptor. A level of 5 may be more accurate if that performance is not sustained. This best-fit approach explains why an online gradebook average is not always the final report-card level. See the RevisionDojo guide to MYP assessment criteria for further explanation.
Criterion levels may become a 1--7 grade
Where a school uses the standard MYP conversion model, it adds the final levels for all four criteria:
For example, A6, B5, C7, and D4 produce 22/32, commonly converted to grade 5.
| Criterion total | Subject grade |
|---|---|
| 1--5 | 1 |
| 6--9 | 2 |
| 10--14 | 3 |
| 15--18 | 4 |
| 19--23 | 5 |
| 24--27 | 6 |
| 28--32 | 7 |
Students should verify that their school uses this conversion for the relevant report. The RevisionDojo explanation of MYP grade boundaries clarifies the relationship between criterion totals and subject grades.
Why 4 out of 8 does not mean 50 percent
A criterion level of 4/8 is not a percentage score. It means the evidence best matches the level 3--4 descriptor. Similarly, four criterion levels of 7 create a total of 28/32, which commonly converts to subject grade 7 even though the arithmetic fraction is 87.5%.
Percentages measure raw marks, while criterion levels describe the quality and complexity of performance. Schools may display local percentages, but these should not be confused with IB achievement levels.
Classroom reports and Physics eAssessment results
A school report is different from an official MYP Physics eAssessment result. Classroom grades come from teacher-assessed evidence collected during the course. MYP Year 5 eAssessment is an optional external IB assessment.
Physics is offered as an on-screen science examination lasting up to two hours. The current model distributes assessment across three broad areas:
| Examination area | Criteria | Weighting |
|---|---|---|
| Knowing and understanding | A | 25% |
| Investigation skills | B and C | 50% combined |
| Applying science | D | 25% |
The IB on-screen examination information confirms the format. External examiners award raw marks, after which the IB applies subject-specific, session-specific grade boundaries to produce a final grade from 1--7.
Students must not place an examination percentage into the classroom 32-point table. A classroom grade, predicted eAssessment grade, and official MYP course result can legitimately differ because they use different evidence and grading processes.
How students should use the report
Read the four criterion levels before focusing on the overall grade. A profile of A6, B5, C7, and D4 is more informative than grade 5 because it identifies Criterion D as the clearest priority.
Turn weaker criteria into specific actions:
- Criterion A: review concepts, equations, units, and unfamiliar applications.
- Criterion B: practise hypotheses, variables, safety, and replicable methods.
- Criterion C: improve graphs, uncertainty, conclusions, and method evaluation.
- Criterion D: build balanced evaluations using evidence, implications, terminology, and documented sources.
A useful target is precise: “In my next Criterion C task, I will include uncertainty, use graph evidence to justify the trend, and link each improvement to a named limitation.” Students can review content through the RevisionDojo MYP Physics resource hub, then apply it using the MYP Physics Questionbank.
Common interpretation mistakes
- Averaging every task mechanically: Criterion levels normally involve best-fit judgment.
- Reading 4/8 as 50%: Rubric levels are not percentages.
- Focusing only on Criterion A: Investigation, evaluation, and reflection matter equally.
- Treating every 1--7 grade as an IB exam result: School and external grades have different sources.
- Using classroom boundaries for eAssessment: External boundaries can change between sessions.
- Ignoring comments: Feedback often identifies the strand preventing progress.
Conclusion
An MYP Physics report card shows achievement in knowing and understanding, inquiring and designing, processing and evaluating, and reflecting on the impacts of science. Each criterion contributes up to 8 points, and many schools convert the total out of 32 into a 1--7 subject grade.
Students should use the criterion profile and comments to choose one precise improvement target. RevisionDojo Study Notes, the Physics Questionbank, and Jojo AI can then support focused review and practice.
Sources and referenced URLs
- IB MYP sciences subject brief
- IB MYP assessment and examinations
- IB MYP on-screen examinations
- IB MYP grading and awards
- IB guidance on MYP flexibility
- RevisionDojo MYP assessment criteria guide
- RevisionDojo MYP grade boundaries guide
- RevisionDojo MYP evaluation and reporting guide
- RevisionDojo MYP Physics resources
- RevisionDojo MYP Physics Questionbank
