MYP Physics has four assessment criteria, labelled A, B, C and D. Each criterion has a maximum achievement level of 8, producing a classroom criterion total out of 32.
Physics follows the common MYP Sciences criteria rather than a physics-only framework. Students must demonstrate scientific knowledge, investigation design, data analysis and reflection on the implications of science. This article explains each criterion, classroom grading and the different system used for MYP Physics eAssessment.
The four MYP Physics criteria
The four criteria are equally important. Although one classroom task may assess only one or two criteria, students need opportunities to demonstrate all four during the reporting period.
| Criterion | Official focus | What students demonstrate | Maximum level |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | Knowing and understanding | Explain physics, apply knowledge and make scientifically supported judgments | 8 |
| B | Inquiring and designing | Formulate questions and hypotheses, identify variables and design investigations | 8 |
| C | Processing and evaluating | Present and interpret data, evaluate methods and propose improvements | 8 |
| D | Reflecting on the impacts of science | Explain applications, evaluate implications and document sources | 8 |
Criterion A: Knowing and understanding
Criterion A assesses more than factual recall. Students must explain relevant physics, apply principles in familiar and unfamiliar situations, and analyse information to reach justified conclusions.
For example, recalling the kinetic energy equation is only one step. A stronger response applies it correctly, explains how speed affects kinetic energy and evaluates the consequences for vehicle safety.
Criterion B: Inquiring and designing
Criterion B focuses on planning an investigation. Students may need to formulate a testable question and reasoned hypothesis, identify variables, explain how data will be collected, and design a logical and safe method.
Carrying out an experiment does not automatically earn a high level. The criterion rewards the quality of the design, including whether the method could generate sufficient relevant data.
Criterion C: Processing and evaluating
Criterion C concerns the use of experimental evidence. Students organize and process data, produce appropriate graphs, interpret patterns, evaluate a hypothesis, identify methodological limitations and propose realistic improvements.
Comments such as “human error affected the results” are too vague. A better evaluation identifies a specific limitation, explains its likely effect and proposes a modification that addresses it.
Criterion D: Reflecting on the impacts of science
Criterion D connects physics to real-world issues such as nuclear power, renewable energy, medical imaging or satellite technology. Students evaluate relevant environmental, economic, ethical, social or political implications.
Claims should be supported by physics and documented sources. Criterion D is not simply a personal opinion about whether a technology is “good” or “bad.”
How MYP Physics classroom grading works
Each criterion receives an achievement level from 0 to 8. Level 0 applies when the evidence does not reach a standard described by the published descriptors, while levels 1 to 8 represent increasing achievement.
Descriptors are normally arranged in bands of 1-2, 3-4, 5-6 and 7-8. Teachers use professional judgment and best fit to determine which descriptor most accurately represents the evidence. They do not treat every strand as a separate point or simply convert percentages.
At the reporting stage, the four criterion levels are added:
| Criterion | Example level |
|---|---|
| A: Knowing and understanding | 7 |
| B: Inquiring and designing | 6 |
| C: Processing and evaluating | 5 |
| D: Reflecting on the impacts of science | 7 |
| Total | 25 out of 32 |
Using the standard MYP classroom conversion table, 25 out of 32 produces a final grade of 6.
| Total criterion level | Final MYP grade |
|---|---|
| 1-5 | 1 |
| 6-9 | 2 |
| 10-14 | 3 |
| 15-18 | 4 |
| 19-23 | 5 |
| 24-27 | 6 |
| 28-32 | 7 |
A total of 25 should not be treated as a conventional percentage. MYP achievement levels describe performance against criteria, and no universal official rule states that a particular percentage always equals a particular MYP grade.
Students should not automatically average every score earned during the term. Teachers consider the available evidence for each criterion and determine the level that best represents achievement under the school’s assessment policy.
How MYP Physics eAssessment works
The optional MYP Physics eAssessment is an externally marked on-screen examination available at the end of MYP Year 5. It is generally two hours long and assesses the same four criteria, but it does not use the classroom 32-point calculation.
The official sciences subject brief presents this 100-mark blueprint:
| eAssessment task | Main criteria | Indicative marks |
|---|---|---|
| Knowing and understanding | Criterion A | 25 |
| Investigation skills | Criteria B and C | 50 |
| Applying science | Criterion D | 25 |
| Total | Criteria A-D | 100 |
Criteria B and C appear together under investigation skills but remain distinct criteria. Across the blueprint, all four criteria are equally weighted, although the precise mark allocation may vary slightly between examinations.
Examiners award raw marks using authorized markschemes and markbands. The IB then applies subject- and session-specific grade boundaries to convert the raw total into a grade from 1 to 7.
The distinction is important:
- Classroom result: four criterion levels produce a total out of 32, followed by the standard MYP conversion.
- Official eAssessment result: examination responses receive raw marks, followed by the Physics boundaries for that session.
Students should not convert a practice score out of 100 into a total out of 32 and present it as official. Past Physics boundaries can support estimates, but they cannot guarantee the boundary for a future session.
The IB describes eAssessment as optional for schools. Students seeking an IB-validated MYP Physics course result complete the relevant on-screen examination, while full MYP Certificate candidates must satisfy the wider certificate requirements.
How to improve across all four criteria
Revising only equations and definitions mainly prepares students for Criterion A. Strong performance requires deliberate practice across the complete framework:
- solve unfamiliar calculation and explanation questions for Criterion A
- design an investigation from a short scenario for Criterion B
- graph data and evaluate a method for Criterion C
- assess a physics application using documented evidence for Criterion D
Before answering, identify the command term. Words such as state, explain, design, interpret, evaluate and discuss demand different responses. Scientifically correct writing can still underperform if it does not complete the required action.
Students can use RevisionDojo MYP Physics resources for targeted practice. The guide to MYP assessment criteria and explanation of MYP grading help translate rubric language into practical steps.
For external assessment, combine targeted questions with timed work. RevisionDojo’s 30-day MYP eAssessment study plan and MYP eAssessment preparation advice cover scheduling, command terms, timing and digital exam habits.
Common mistakes to avoid
- Calling the criteria separate exams: They are four dimensions of achievement, not four Physics papers.
- Treating 4 out of 8 as 50%: Achievement levels describe rubric performance, not percentages.
- Assuming every task assesses every criterion: Tests, investigations and research tasks may target different criteria.
- Averaging all scores automatically: Final judgments depend on relevant evidence and school assessment policy.
- Using classroom boundaries for eAssessment: The on-screen examination uses raw marks and session-specific boundaries.
- Ignoring weaker criteria: Strong factual knowledge cannot fully compensate for weak investigation, evaluation or reflection.
Conclusion
The MYP Physics number of criteria is four: Knowing and understanding, Inquiring and designing, Processing and evaluating, and Reflecting on the impacts of science. Each classroom criterion has a maximum level of 8, giving a total out of 32 that converts into a grade from 1 to 7.
MYP Physics eAssessment assesses the same criteria but uses raw examination marks and session-specific boundaries. RevisionDojo’s MYP Physics Questionbank, Study Notes, Jojo AI and timed exam tools can support balanced preparation across all four criteria.
Sources and referenced URLs
- IB MYP Sciences subject brief and assessment blueprint
- IB overview of MYP assessment and examinations
- IB explanation of MYP passing criteria and examination blueprints
- IB MYP grading and awards requirements
- RevisionDojo MYP Physics resources
- RevisionDojo guide to MYP assessment criteria
- RevisionDojo explanation of MYP grading
- RevisionDojo 30-day MYP eAssessment study plan
- RevisionDojo MYP eAssessment preparation advice
