What are the main skills assessed in MYP Individuals and Societies?

The subject assesses four broad areas: knowing and understanding, investigating, communicating, and thinking critically. Knowing and understanding requires accurate terminology, factual knowledge, conceptual understanding, and application. Investigating covers research questions, planning, methods, evidence collection, and reflection on the research process. Communicating focuses on organization, appropriate formats, audience awareness, and documentation of sources. Thinking critically requires students to analyze evidence, compare perspectives, evaluate arguments, and reach supported conclusions.

Is there one fixed MYP Individuals and Societies syllabus?

There is no single worldwide sequence of content that every MYP school must teach identically. The IB provides a curriculum framework, objectives, concepts, global contexts, and assessment criteria, while schools select appropriate disciplinary content. One school may offer integrated humanities, while another may teach separate history, geography, or economics courses. Local and national curriculum requirements can also influence the topics selected. Students should therefore use their teacher’s unit outlines alongside the common MYP assessment objectives when planning revision.

What is the difference between describing and analyzing in MYP humanities?

Describing means giving a detailed account of what happened, what a source shows, or what features are present. Analyzing goes further by breaking information into parts and explaining relationships, patterns, causes, consequences, or significance. For example, describing migration might identify that many people moved from rural areas to cities. Analyzing migration would explain how employment opportunities, services, transport networks, and rural pressures interacted to influence that movement. Students can improve analysis by repeatedly asking how, why, and why the evidence matters.

How do I evaluate a source in MYP Individuals and Societies?

Begin by identifying the source’s origin, purpose, content, audience, and context. Explain how one or more of these features gives the source value for the particular question being investigated. Then identify a limitation, making clear what the source cannot reliably reveal or whose perspective it may exclude. Avoid dismissing a source simply because it is biased, since a biased source may still provide valuable evidence about attitudes or intentions. Finish by connecting your evaluation to the inquiry rather than presenting a memorized source-analysis checklist.

How can I write a focused research question for Criterion B?

A focused research question should identify a manageable issue, place or group, period, and analytical direction. Questions beginning with “to what extent,” “how significant,” or “how far” often encourage investigation, although the wording must suit the topic. For example, “What is globalization?” is too broad for a sustained investigation. A more focused question would be, “To what extent did international tourism affect employment in Region X between 2018 and 2025?” Before finalizing it, check that credible evidence is available and that the question can be answered within the assigned time and word limit.

How should I revise for an MYP Individuals and Societies assessment?

Start by confirming the topics, command terms, and assessment criteria that the task will cover. Use active recall to learn essential concepts, terminology, examples, and case-study evidence. Then practise applying that knowledge through source questions, research planning, data interpretation, and short analytical paragraphs. Review your work against the criterion descriptors and rewrite weak sections rather than simply checking whether the facts are correct. As the assessment approaches, complete timed practice so that organization, evidence selection, and judgement become reliable under pressure.

Back to all posts

MYP Individuals and Societies Skills Explained

MYP Individuals and Societies Revision Guides MYP Study Guides

David G.

• 11 Sept 2026•10

MYP Individuals and Societies Skills Explained

Join 650k+ students breezing through the IBReady to breeze through the IB?

MYP Individuals and Societies Skills Explained | RevisionDojo

Back to all posts

MYP Individuals and Societies Skills Explained

MYP Individuals and Societies Revision Guides MYP Study Guides

David G.

• 11 Sept 2026•10

MYP Individuals and Societies skills include research, source analysis, critical thinking, communication, conceptual understanding, and evaluating different perspectives. Students do not simply memorize historical events or geographical facts. They use evidence to explain how people, societies, institutions, and environments interact.

Although schools choose different topics, every MYP Individuals and Societies course develops four assessment objectives: knowing and understanding, investigating, communicating, and thinking critically. Understanding these criteria helps you recognize what each task requires and improve your responses systematically.

What is MYP Individuals and Societies?

Individuals and Societies is the MYP subject group covering humanities and social sciences. According to the IB overview of Individuals and Societies, students examine historical, geographical, political, social, economic, religious, technological, and cultural factors affecting people and environments.

Schools may teach this subject through:

Discrete courses, such as history, geography, economics, or politics
Modular courses covering several disciplines separately
Integrated courses, often called humanities or social studies

There is therefore no single worldwide sequence of topics. A school might teach migration, empires, trade, conflict, urbanization, governance, development, or environmental sustainability. What remains consistent is the emphasis on inquiry, evidence, concepts, and interpretation.

What does the syllabus cover?

The MYP Individuals and Societies syllabus is a curriculum framework rather than a fixed content specification. Schools select appropriate content while developing the required concepts, global understanding, approaches to learning, and assessment objectives.

Area	Possible content	Important skills
History	Empires, revolutions, migration, civil rights	Causation, chronology, source evaluation
Geography	Population, resources, climate, development	Spatial and data analysis
Economics	Scarcity, markets, trade, inequality	Applying models and evaluating choices
Politics	Government, power, rights, international relations	Comparing systems and perspectives
Sociology	Identity, culture, social groups	Interpreting behavior and questioning assumptions

The central subject-group concepts are change, global interactions, systems, and time, place and space. Concepts help students transfer understanding between cases. For example, urbanization can be examined as a changing system influenced by migration, government policy, economic activity, and global connections.

Learning is also situated within MYP global contexts, such as globalization and sustainability, fairness and development, and orientation in space and time. The official MYP curriculum overview explains how these contexts connect classroom knowledge to issues of local and global significance.

The four MYP Individuals and Societies skills

The four criteria provide the clearest account of what students must demonstrate. Each has a maximum achievement level of 8, although task-specific expectations and descriptors vary according to the MYP year.

Criterion A: Knowing and understanding

This criterion assesses whether you can use factual and conceptual knowledge accurately. Strong responses define terminology, select relevant examples, explain concepts, and apply knowledge to the issue in the question.

Listing facts is insufficient. If asked why migration occurs, naming employment, conflict, and environmental hazards provides relevant knowledge, but you must explain how these factors affect decisions and why their importance differs among groups.

Criterion B: Investigating

Investigation turns a broad topic into a manageable inquiry. Students formulate a focused research question, explain its relevance, create an action plan, gather and record evidence, and evaluate the research process.

“What is urbanization?” is too broad and mainly invites description. “To what extent did access to employment influence migration into City X between 2015 and 2025?” is stronger because it establishes a factor, location, period, and evaluative direction. A suitable question must also be answerable using credible evidence within the available time.

Criterion C: Communicating

Communication concerns how clearly and appropriately ideas are presented. The required format might be an essay, report, presentation, map, infographic, speech, or another product chosen by the teacher.

Students should organize information logically, adapt language to audience and purpose, use evidence precisely, and document sources through a recognized referencing system. The RevisionDojo essay-structure guide explains how claims, evidence, reasoning, and conclusions work together.

Criterion D: Thinking critically

Critical thinking means examining evidence instead of accepting it immediately. Students identify arguments, analyze causes and consequences, compare perspectives, evaluate sources, synthesize information, and reach supported conclusions.

Being critical does not mean dismissing every source as biased. It means deciding what a source can reliably reveal, what its limitations are, and how it contributes to the inquiry. Consider its origin, purpose, audience, content, and context, but connect those features directly to the question. RevisionDojo’s guide to the MYP Individuals and Societies criteria provides further criterion-specific guidance.

Worked source-evaluation example

Consider the question: Using Sources A and B, evaluate whether urban redevelopment improved life for local residents.

Source A is a city government report claiming that redevelopment created 2,000 jobs and improved transport. Source B is a residents’ association survey reporting higher rents and displacement among long-term residents.

A strong answer might explain that Source A provides measurable evidence of economic and transport benefits, but its purpose may encourage the government to emphasize policy successes. Source B adds residents’ experiences and shows that benefits were unevenly distributed, although the association may represent negatively affected residents more strongly than businesses or newcomers. A balanced conclusion would recognize improved infrastructure and employment while judging that affordability and displacement limited the gains for some groups.

This response applies knowledge, communicates logically, compares perspectives, evaluates limitations, and reaches a qualified judgement. The evidence is interpreted rather than copied.

Approaches to learning and common mistakes

MYP humanities also develops approaches to learning, or ATL skills. Research skills support source selection and referencing; thinking skills support analysis and transfer; communication skills support writing and presentation. Self-management helps students plan investigations, while social skills support collaboration and engagement with different perspectives.

Common mistakes include:

Revising facts without practising application
Writing an unmanageably broad research question
Treating all websites as equally reliable
Describing perspectives without comparing them
Calling a source biased without explaining the effect
Ignoring the question’s command term
Repeating evidence instead of explaining its significance
Ending without a clear, supported judgement

The RevisionDojo case-study guide shows how examples should support an argument rather than appear as isolated information.

How to improve in practice

First identify the criterion being assessed. For Criterion B, practise framing questions and planning research; for Criterion D, compare sources and defend judgements. A useful weekly routine is to review one concept, retrieve key terms from memory, answer one source-based question, compare the response with the criterion descriptors, and rewrite its weakest section.

The MYP Individuals and Societies resource hub supports topic review, while the MYP Individuals and Societies Questionbank provides targeted practice. Resources on topics such as urbanization are useful for connecting data, systems, perspectives, and sustainability.

Conclusion

MYP Individuals and Societies develops accurate knowledge, systematic investigation, purposeful communication, and critical evaluation. Strong students select relevant evidence, explain its significance, compare perspectives, and reach supported conclusions. RevisionDojo Study Notes and Flashcards can reinforce knowledge, while the Questionbank and Jojo AI can support structured practice and feedback.

Sources and referenced URLs

Add as a preferred source on Google