An MYP Extended Mathematics report card usually shows achievement in four mathematics criteria, an overall grade from 1 to 7, and teacher feedback. Depending on the school, it may also include a criterion total out of 32, approaches to learning information, and progress comments.
A school report is not the same as an official MYP Extended Mathematics eAssessment result. Internal grades come from evidence assessed by teachers, while the official result comes from an externally marked on-screen examination.
What appears on an MYP Extended Mathematics report card?
Schools create their own reporting layouts, so there is no single worldwide template. A typical report may include:
- The course name, such as MYP Extended Mathematics
- Achievement levels for Criteria A, B, C and D
- A combined criterion total, usually out of 32
- An overall subject grade from 1 to 7
- Written feedback describing strengths and next steps
- Approaches to learning, engagement or work-habit indicators
- A provisional eAssessment grade, where applicable
The criterion breakdown is especially useful. The overall grade summarizes attainment, but the four levels reveal whether improvement is needed in mathematical knowledge, investigation, communication or contextual application.
The four MYP Extended Mathematics criteria
The current IB MYP Mathematics subject brief identifies four equally weighted criteria. Each has achievement levels from 0 to 8, producing a maximum internal total of 32.
| Criterion | What it measures |
|---|---|
| A: Knowing and understanding | Selecting and applying appropriate mathematics to reach accurate solutions. |
| B: Investigating patterns | Identifying relationships, forming rules, testing conjectures and justifying conclusions. |
| C: Communicating | Using correct notation, representations and coherent mathematical reasoning. |
| D: Applying mathematics in real-life contexts | Modelling authentic situations, solving them and evaluating whether answers are reasonable. |
Extended Mathematics contains more demanding content than the standard pathway, but it uses the same four criteria. Accurate calculations are therefore not enough. A correct answer with poorly organized reasoning may provide strong evidence for Criterion A but weaker evidence for Criterion C.
RevisionDojo’s guide to how MYP Mathematics is assessed explains how students can practise each criterion deliberately.
How the internal report-card grade is calculated
For criterion-based reporting, the process normally has three stages:
- The teacher assesses work against the published criterion descriptors.
- The teacher determines a final best-fit achievement level from 0 to 8 for each criterion.
- The four levels are added and converted into a 1--7 grade.
Best fit is not necessarily the arithmetic mean of every mark collected. Teachers consider the available evidence and select the descriptor that most accurately represents demonstrated achievement. The school’s assessment policy should explain how recent work, repeated assessments and missing evidence are treated.
The following conversion table is widely used for final MYP criterion totals. Students should still check the school’s policy, especially for interim reports.
| Criterion total | Final MYP grade |
|---|---|
| 1--5 | 1 |
| 6--9 | 2 |
| 10--14 | 3 |
| 15--18 | 4 |
| 19--23 | 5 |
| 24--27 | 6 |
| 28--32 | 7 |
RevisionDojo provides further context in its guide to the MYP grade boundaries and 1--7 scale. These internal boundaries must not be substituted for official eAssessment boundaries.
Worked internal grading example
Suppose a report contains these best-fit levels:
| Criterion | Achievement level |
|---|---|
| A: Knowing and understanding | 7 |
| B: Investigating patterns | 6 |
| C: Communicating | 5 |
| D: Applying mathematics in real-life contexts | 7 |
The total is 7 + 6 + 5 + 7 = 25. Under the table above, 25 out of 32 corresponds to grade 6.
It should not be interpreted simply as 78.125%, because achievement levels describe performance against rubrics rather than percentage points earned on a conventional test. Criterion C is the lowest result, so useful next steps might include clearer notation, labelled graphs, logical working and explicit explanations.
What the official eAssessment result shows
The IB explains that MYP eAssessment is an optional form of external assessment for most MYP subject groups. Extended Mathematics is assessed through an externally marked on-screen examination.
The examination uses three broad task types:
- Knowing and understanding
- Investigating patterns
- Applying mathematics in real-life contexts
Communication is assessed throughout the examination rather than through one isolated task. All four criteria contribute equally to the assessment design.
The official MYP Course Results document records the subject and awarded 1--7 grade. It should not be expected to reproduce the school report’s four internal criterion levels. The IB’s MYP regulations distinguish classroom assessment from assessments used for official course results.
How MYP Extended Mathematics grade boundaries work
Official MYP Extended Mathematics grade boundaries convert examination performance into a grade from 1 to 7. The IB determines boundaries separately for each examination session through grade-awarding procedures.
| Internal school report | Official eAssessment result |
|---|---|
| Uses teacher judgments against criterion descriptors | Uses an externally marked on-screen examination |
| Criterion levels normally total 32 | Raw performance uses session-specific boundaries |
| May include feedback and learning habits | Officially reports a 1--7 course grade |
| Follows the school’s reporting policy | Is awarded by the IB |
Boundaries may change because examination papers are not identical in difficulty. Grade awarding aims to keep the standard represented by each grade comparable, so a harder paper may have lower raw-mark boundaries.
For example, imagine that one session placed grade 6 at 72--83 and grade 7 at 84 or above. A mark of 81 would receive a 6, while 84 would receive a 7. These figures are illustrative only; students must use the official table for the exact subject and examination session.
Students should never apply the internal 28--32 = grade 7 conversion directly to an eAssessment raw mark or assume that a previous session’s boundaries will remain unchanged.
How to use the report effectively
A report showing A: 7, B: 4, C: 6 and D: 5 does not mean the student understands a fixed percentage of the course. It shows uneven attainment across four objectives.
A low Criterion B level may indicate difficulty forming or justifying general rules. A low Criterion D level may reveal problems creating models, selecting assumptions or evaluating contextual solutions. Students should:
- Identify the lowest criterion
- Read its descriptor and teacher comments
- Review work that produced the level
- Classify errors as conceptual, procedural, communicative or contextual
- Practise that criterion through unfamiliar questions
- Ask what evidence would meet the next descriptor band
The RevisionDojo MYP Extended Mathematics resources support targeted topic and criterion practice. Students considering later course choices can also read whether MYP Extended Mathematics marks matter.
Common reporting mistakes
The most common mistake is treating an achievement level out of 8 as a final grade. Criterion level 6 and subject grade 6 represent different measurements.
Students should also avoid averaging every task automatically, converting rubric levels into percentages, or using classroom boundaries to predict official results. Extended Mathematics does not award bonus points; its official result remains on the same 1--7 scale as Mathematics. Reports should label each figure clearly as a raw mark, criterion level, criterion total, predicted grade or official result.
Conclusion
An MYP Extended Mathematics report card normally shows four criterion levels, a combined total and an overall 1--7 grade, although schools determine the precise layout. The official eAssessment result is separate and comes from an externally marked on-screen examination using session-specific boundaries.
Students should use the criterion feedback to choose what to practise rather than reducing every result to a percentage. RevisionDojo’s Extended Mathematics Questionbank, Study Notes and MYP eAssessment study plan can support focused preparation.
Sources and referenced URLs
- IB MYP Mathematics subject brief
- IB MYP assessment and examinations
- IB MYP grading and awards
- IB Middle Years Programme regulations
- RevisionDojo MYP Extended Mathematics resources
- RevisionDojo guide to MYP Mathematics assessment
- RevisionDojo MYP grade-boundaries guide
- RevisionDojo guide to the importance of MYP Extended Mathematics marks
- RevisionDojo 30-day MYP eAssessment study plan




