A workable IB Physics IA timeline begins in early September and targets final submission by November 30. Use September to choose and pilot the investigation, October to collect and process data, and November to write, obtain permitted feedback, and revise.
This September-to-November plan is a recommendation, not an IB deadline. Your school sets its own internal deadlines, so confirm dates for topic approval, laboratory access, draft feedback, and final submission before adapting the schedule.
What the IB officially requires
Under the current Physics course, the internal assessment is officially called the scientific investigation. The official IB Physics subject brief describes it as an open-ended investigation in which you collect and analyse data to answer your own research question.
The main requirements are:
- The report has a maximum overall word count of 3,000 words.
- The investigation contributes 20% of the final Physics grade at SL and HL.
- The IB allocates 10 hours to the internal assessment.
- Teachers mark the work internally, after which the IB may moderate the marks.
- Assessment uses four criteria: Research design, Data analysis, Conclusion, and Evaluation, for 24 marks in total.
The 10-hour allocation does not mean you should attempt the project in one week. Spreading the investigation across three months creates time to reserve equipment, repeat unsuccessful trials, process uncertainties, and respond to allowed teacher feedback.
Recommended September-to-November timeline
This fall IA schedule for Physics assumes that you start in the first week of September. Adjust it around school holidays, laboratory availability, and teacher checkpoints.
| Period | Main objective | Required deliverable |
|---|---|---|
| September 1-7 | Identify feasible topics | Shortlist of 2-3 measurable ideas |
| September 8-14 | Refine the question | Variables, range, and theoretical model |
| September 15-21 | Conduct a pilot | Pilot data and necessary changes |
| September 22-30 | Finalize the design | Approved method, safety plan, and equipment booking |
| October 1-12 | Collect main data | Complete raw data with units and uncertainties |
| October 13-19 | Repair or repeat | Replacement trials and investigated anomalies |
| October 20-31 | Process results | Calculations, uncertainty treatment, and graphs |
| November 1-9 | Begin the report | Research design and data analysis sections |
| November 10-16 | Complete the first draft | Conclusion, evaluation, and complete report |
| November 17-23 | Use permitted feedback | Scientifically revised draft |
| November 24-30 | Conduct the final audit | Proofread, referenced final report |
Protect October 13-19 as an experimental buffer. Apparatus failures, inconsistent readings, uncontrolled temperatures, small signal changes, and unavailable equipment can disrupt even a seemingly simple investigation.
September: develop a testable investigation
Choose a feasible idea
Start with available equipment and time, not the most sophisticated topic you can imagine. A manageable investigation normally has one clearly varied independent variable, one measured dependent variable, relevant controls, repeated measurements, and a physical model for comparison.
For example, asking how pendulum length affects period is more useful than asking broadly what affects pendulum motion. A focused question should specify the length range, measurement method, and conditions being controlled.
Use the guide to choosing a manageable IA experiment to reject ideas requiring unavailable sensors, unsafe procedures, or several changing variables. Originality is less important than a defensible method and sufficient quantitative evidence.
Plan the analysis before collecting data
Your question should identify the independent variable, dependent variable, physical system, and relevant range. Decide which graph, equation, gradient, exponent, or accepted value will answer it.
For a pendulum investigation, the model
suggests plotting against to test the expected linear relationship. This planning prevents you from collecting numerous measurements that do not test a meaningful physical model.
Pilot and finalize the method
A genuine pilot tests the complete procedure at the lowest, middle, and highest planned values. Check whether the change in the dependent variable is large relative to its uncertainty, whether controls can be maintained, and whether repetitions show acceptable variation.
By September 30, secure approval for the question, method, apparatus, safety assessment, prepared data tables, and laboratory booking. Record instrument resolution and measurement uncertainty immediately. The Physics IA essentials guide provides an overview, but your teacher's safety and approval procedures take priority.
October: collect and process reliable data
Complete the main experiment during October 1-12. Record raw measurements immediately using descriptive headings, units, uncertainties, consistent precision, and relevant qualitative observations.
Collect enough data to identify a trend, assess random variation, and notice anomalies. During October 13-19, repeat questionable measurements or repair the method. Repeating trials is legitimate when reported honestly; deleting inconvenient results without scientific justification is not.
During October 20-31, calculate derived quantities, handle uncertainties appropriately, and produce correctly labelled graphs. Include at least one sample calculation, check significant figures, and retain full precision until final rounding.
By the end of October, you should be able to explain what the gradient, intercept, fit, or percentage discrepancy means physically. If that interpretation remains unclear, resolve it before drafting the conclusion.
November: turn evidence into the report
Draft Research design and Data analysis during November 1-9. Explain why you selected the range, intervals, instruments, repetitions, and controls rather than providing only an equipment list and procedure.
During November 10-16, write a conclusion that directly answers the research question using processed results. Compare your findings with the theoretical model or accepted value and account for uncertainty where appropriate.
Your evaluation should prioritize limitations according to their effect. Replace vague claims such as “human error affected the experiment” with a specific mechanism, its likely effect on scatter, gradient, intercept, or accuracy, and a feasible improvement.
Use the IB Physics IA rubric explanation to check that all four criteria are visible. Annotated Physics IA examples can demonstrate effective scientific communication, but you should never copy an exemplar's wording, structure, or method.
Reserve November 17-23 for feedback permitted under your school's process. Use November 24-30 to:
- Check titles, captions, quantities, units, and uncertainty notation.
- Verify significant figures and decimal places.
- Acknowledge every source, image, model, and external data set.
- Confirm that the conclusion answers the exact question.
- Connect each major limitation to a realistic improvement.
- Remove repeated theory and remain within 3,000 words.
- Export the required file and inspect it after conversion.
Common scheduling mistakes
Waiting for the perfect idea sacrifices valuable piloting time. Select a viable topic early, then improve its range, measurement method, and analysis.
Writing before processing data often produces excessive background theory and weak analysis. Complete the calculations and central graphs first so that evidence controls the report.
Booking only one laboratory session leaves no recovery route if the apparatus fails. Arrange a main session and backup period before demand for equipment increases.
Leaving revision until November 30 defeats the purpose of the timeline. Aim for a complete first draft by approximately November 16, leaving two weeks for correction and formatting.
Managing weekly work
Plan two focused planning or writing sessions each week, plus laboratory time during data collection. Keep a brief decision log recording what changed, why it changed, which files were created, and what must happen next. This makes the final method and evaluation easier to write accurately.
For another criterion check, the RevisionDojo Physics IA Grader can identify areas requiring closer review. AI feedback should support your judgment, not replace your analysis or your teacher's instructions.
Conclusion
To finish before winter break, begin the IB Physics IA timeline in early September, finalize the design by the end of that month, complete data collection and processing in October, and produce a first draft by mid-November. Protecting time for failed trials and revision is more valuable than assuming the first experiment will work perfectly.
RevisionDojo can support the process through Physics IA guides, annotated examples, Jojo AI, and rubric-aligned IA Feedback. Use planning resources early and the Physics IA Grader near submission, while following your teacher's deadlines and academic integrity requirements.
Sources and referenced URLs
- Official IB Diploma Programme Physics subject brief
- Official IB Physics curriculum updates
- RevisionDojo Physics internal assessment essentials
- RevisionDojo guide to choosing a manageable experiment
- RevisionDojo explanation of the Physics IA rubric
- RevisionDojo annotated Physics IA examples
- RevisionDojo Physics IA Grader
