Why Investigations Hurt Science Grades More Than Tests
Many students enjoy experiments but lose marks when investigations are assessed.
The experiment works.
The data exists.
The report is finished.
Yet results are lower than expected.
In the IB Middle Years Programme, science investigations are not about doing experiments. They’re about demonstrating scientific thinking. Most lost marks come from predictable mistakes — not weak ability.
Mistake 1: Writing an Aim That’s Too Vague
A common issue is an aim like:
“To investigate plants.”
This tells the examiner almost nothing.
High-scoring aims:
- Clearly identify the independent variable
- Clearly identify the dependent variable
- Are specific and measurable
A precise aim sets up the entire investigation. A vague one limits marks from the start.
Mistake 2: Listing Variables Without Explaining Them
Many students can name variables — but don’t explain them.
Weak responses:
- List independent, dependent, and controlled variables
- Stop there
Strong responses:
- Explain why each variable must be controlled
- Describe how it will be kept constant
Marks are awarded for reasoning, not naming.
Mistake 3: Describing the Method Without Justification
Students often write detailed step-by-step methods but lose marks because they don’t explain why those steps matter.
High-level investigation methods:
- Justify equipment choices
- Explain how reliability is improved
- Show awareness of fair testing
A shorter, well-justified method usually scores higher than a long, descriptive one.
Mistake 4: Treating Data as Self-Explanatory
Tables and graphs do not earn marks on their own.
Students lose marks when they:
- Present data without explanation
- Describe trends without interpretation
- Ignore anomalies
High-scoring responses:
- Refer to specific data points
- Explain patterns and outliers
- Link data to scientific theory
Data must be used, not just shown.
Mistake 5: Writing Conclusions That Repeat Results
One of the most common errors is a conclusion that restates numbers.
Strong conclusions:
- Answer the research question directly
- Refer to processed data
- Explain whether the hypothesis was supported — and why
Repeating results without explanation caps grades quickly.
Mistake 6: Weak Evaluation of Limitations
Evaluation is where many investigations plateau.
Common weak statements include:
- “Human error affected results”
- “More trials would improve accuracy”
High-level evaluation:
- Identifies specific limitations
- Explains their impact on results
- Suggests realistic, relevant improvements
Generic evaluation rarely scores well.
Mistake 7: Ignoring the Assessed Criterion
Not every investigation assesses every skill.
Students lose marks when they:
- Try to include everything
- Don’t focus on the assessed criterion
- Spread explanations too thin
Strong students tailor each section to what is actually being assessed.
Why These Mistakes Keep Repeating
Most students repeat the same mistakes because they:
- Don’t analyse feedback carefully
- Rewrite whole reports instead of fixing one skill
- Focus on content instead of criteria
Once students understand why marks were lost, improvement accelerates.
How Students Fix These Mistakes Faster
Grades improve most when students:
- Review investigations by criterion
- Practise explaining one section at a time
- Rewrite aims, justifications, or evaluations using feedback
This is where structured, criteria-focused practice matters. Tools like RevisionDojo help students practise investigation-style questions, understand what examiners reward, and apply feedback precisely instead of guessing what went wrong.
The result is fewer repeated mistakes — and clearer progress.
Questions Students and Parents Often Ask
Are investigations more important than tests in MYP Science?
They often carry significant weight because they assess multiple criteria at once.
Can students improve investigation marks without changing content knowledge?
Yes. Most improvements come from better explanation, justification, and evaluation.
Should students memorise investigation structures?
They should understand why each section exists, not memorise templates blindly.
How quickly can investigation grades improve?
Many students see improvement within one or two tasks once they focus on criteria.
The Key Insight About MYP Science Investigations
Students don’t lose marks because they’re bad at science.
They lose marks because they don’t show their thinking clearly.
Once investigations are treated as a way to demonstrate reasoning, not just report experiments, grades usually follow.
