To finish your Global Politics internal assessment before winter break, begin during the first two weeks of September and target final submission for the last week of November. This provides approximately 12-13 weeks for planning, engagement, complementary research, drafting, and revision, while preserving December as a buffer.
The current IB course calls the assessment the engagement project. It is not simply a research essay. You investigate a political issue through research and direct engagement with relevant people, organizations, activities, or political processes, then analyse and reflect on what the combined evidence reveals.
What the Current Global Politics IA Requires
The revised Global Politics course began first teaching in 2024, with first assessment in 2026. According to the official IB Global Politics subject brief, the engagement project contributes 30% at SL and 20% at HL.
The IB allocates 25 hours at SL and 35 hours at HL to the project. These are recommended course hours, including teacher guidance, rather than a requirement to document an exact number of independent working hours.
Both levels submit a written report of up to 2,000 words. HL students also complete a separate evidence-based recommendation of up to 400 words. Use the current subject guide provided through your teacher because older resources may describe the pre-2026 assessment.
A successful project should:
- Define a focused political issue and inquiry question.
- Investigate relevant actors, power relationships, and perspectives.
- Include purposeful engagement and complementary research.
- Analyse and synthesize evidence rather than merely describing activities.
- Evaluate limitations and reflect critically on the inquiry process.
- At HL, propose a feasible recommendation grounded in evidence.
The IB's Global Politics curriculum update emphasizes experiential learning, research, planning, and reflection. Engagement should therefore happen early enough to influence your analysis.
September-to-November IB Global Politics IA Timeline
This schedule assumes submission near the end of November. Your school's internal deadline takes priority, so move each milestone earlier if required.
| Period | Main task | Concrete output |
|---|---|---|
| September 1-7 | Explore possible issues | Shortlist of 2-3 accessible political issues |
| September 8-14 | Narrow the inquiry | Provisional question, actor map, concepts, teacher approval |
| September 15-21 | Conduct preliminary research | Background notes, bibliography, identified perspectives |
| September 22-30 | Arrange engagement | Confirmed activity, questions, consent arrangements, backup plan |
| October 1-12 | Complete first engagement | Interview or observation notes and immediate reflection |
| October 13-19 | Investigate emerging claims | Research checking claims and filling contextual gaps |
| October 20-31 | Complete further engagement | Contrasting perspective or follow-up evidence |
| November 1-9 | Build the argument | Detailed outline based on analytical claims |
| November 10-16 | Draft the report | Complete report and provisional HL recommendation |
| November 17-23 | Revise against criteria | Improved synthesis, evaluation, reflection, and citations |
| November 24-30 | Proofread and submit | Final word count, bibliography, formatting, and file |
Finishing before December creates protection against illness, delayed replies, cancelled interviews, or changing school deadlines.
September: Select an Issue and Secure Access
Use September for design and access, not intensive drafting. Choose an issue narrow enough to investigate through available people or activities but connected to political concepts such as power, legitimacy, rights, equality, sustainability, sovereignty, conflict, or development.
For example, “refugee policy” is too broad. A more workable inquiry could examine how a local authority balances housing pressure with responsibilities toward asylum seekers. This identifies actors, political tension, scale, and possible engagement routes.
Before committing, ask:
- Is there a genuine political conflict, decision, or distribution of power?
- Can I access people or activities connected to it?
- Can I encounter more than one perspective?
- Is credible contextual research available?
Use the Global Politics IA student planning sheets to record stakeholders, concepts, and evidence gaps. Seek approval by September 14 and confirm your first engagement by September 30, with an alternative if it is cancelled.
When contacting participants, explain the issue, likely duration, intended use of information, and anonymity options. Follow your school's consent, safeguarding, and research ethics procedures.
October: Complete Engagement and Responsive Research
October should be the main investigative month. Engagement might include interviewing stakeholders, observing a public meeting, volunteering with an organization, attending a campaign event, or participating in another activity that provides direct political insight.
A participant's account does not automatically prove a claim. Councillors, activists, officials, and community members provide situated perspectives. Compare their statements with policy documents, reliable reporting, academic analysis, statistics, and other stakeholders.
After each activity, record:
- What it revealed about power, interests, or decision-making
- Which assumptions it supported or challenged
- What bias or limitation affected the evidence
- Which claims require further research
- Whether the inquiry question needs adjustment
This produces the connected process rewarded by the assessment. The RevisionDojo process guide explains how planning, research, engagement, and adjustment should work together. Complete essential engagement by October 31 so drafting does not depend on another person's November availability.
November: Draft and Revise the Argument
Convert your evidence into 3-4 analytical claims. Structure the report around answers to the inquiry question, not a diary-like account of what you did.
A strong analytical section normally combines:
- A claim relevant to the inquiry question
- Evidence from engagement and documentary research
- Application of political concepts or perspectives
- Evaluation of disagreement, reliability, and limitations
- Reflection that advances the analysis
The analysis, synthesis, evaluation, and reflection guide is useful if your material remains descriptive. Explain what the evidence means politically and how competing perspectives affect your judgement.
Complete the full draft by November 16. HL students should formulate their recommendation after reaching a defensible judgement. The recommendation should identify an actor capable of acting, propose a specific action, use inquiry evidence, and consider feasibility or unintended consequences.
During final revision, use an IA criteria checklist. Check whether engagement choices are justified, perspectives are synthesized, limitations are evaluated, and the conclusion answers the inquiry question.
Common Scheduling Mistakes
- Choosing before checking access: An interesting issue is unsuitable if relevant engagement is unavailable.
- Depending on one appointment: Maintain a backup participant or alternative activity.
- Writing the argument before engagement: This encourages students to insert quotations into a conclusion already decided.
- Confusing school and IB deadlines: Your school's internal deadline is the operative requirement for you.
- Reserving December for editing: December may already contain examinations, TOK, Extended Essay, applications, and other coursework.
A Sustainable Weekly Work Pattern
Use two focused sessions each week instead of irregular marathons. Dedicate one to research, communication, or engagement preparation and the other to organizing evidence, reflecting, or drafting.
Maintain a research and engagement log containing dates, decisions, source details, quotations, and limitations. The RevisionDojo Global Politics IA guide brings planning, criteria, and timeline resources together. Jojo AI can help test whether a question is too broad or identify descriptive writing, but it must not invent participant statements, evidence, or reflections.
Conclusion
A realistic IB Global Politics IA timeline begins in early September, secures access by the end of that month, uses October for engagement and responsive research, and reserves November for drafting and criterion-based revision. Aim for a complete draft by mid-November and final submission by November 30.
RevisionDojo's planning sheets, IA guide, checklist, and Jojo AI can support this schedule while keeping your investigation and political judgement at the centre of the work.
Sources and referenced URLs
- Official IB Global Politics subject brief
- Official IB Global Politics curriculum update
- Official IB Global Politics overview
- RevisionDojo Global Politics IA guide
- RevisionDojo suggested Global Politics IA timeline
- RevisionDojo IA process guide
- RevisionDojo analysis and reflection guide
- RevisionDojo Global Politics IA checklist
- RevisionDojo student planning sheets

