Does my teacher mark my MYP Individuals and Societies eAssessment?

No, the official on-screen eAssessment is marked externally by examiners appointed by the IB. Your teacher marks classroom assessments using the MYP criteria, but those marks are separate from the externally validated examination result. The examination is not handled like an ePortfolio in which a teacher's marks are checked through moderation. Your school is responsible for administering the examination securely and submitting the required response files. The IB then completes the external marking and grade-award process.

Is the MYP Individuals and Societies eAssessment marked out of 32 or 80?

The official on-screen examination is marked out of 80, while ordinary classroom assessment commonly summarizes four criteria at up to 8 levels each, giving a total out of 32. These are related but distinct assessment models. In the examination, questions carry specific marks connected to the demands of Criteria A, B, C, and D. Each criterion accounts for 20 of the 80 available marks across the complete paper. Students should not convert an examination score into a classroom total out of 32 unless their school is conducting an explicitly unofficial practice exercise.

What score is needed to pass the Individuals and Societies eAssessment?

There is no single permanent raw mark or percentage that can safely be called the pass mark for every session. The IB converts examination marks into grades from 1 to 7 through its grade-award process. For the MYP certificate, a student must achieve at least grade 3 in Individuals and Societies and every other required component. The student must also earn at least 28 points overall and meet the remaining certificate conditions. A school may set additional progression expectations, so students should distinguish those local rules from the official IB certificate requirements.

Are spelling and grammar directly marked in the examination?

Clear language matters because examiners must be able to understand the student's reasoning and evidence. In the communicating task, style, structure, audience, purpose, and format are explicit parts of what is being assessed. Minor language errors do not automatically remove every available mark if the meaning remains clear and the subject demands are met. However, unclear expression can prevent an examiner from recognizing a valid argument or distinction. Students should therefore prioritize precise terminology, logical paragraphs, and direct answers rather than trying to use unnecessarily complicated vocabulary.

What happens if the computer fails during the MYP Individuals and Societies exam?

The student should immediately alert the invigilator and follow the school's instructions rather than attempting to repair or restart anything independently. Schools are responsible for conducting on-screen examinations securely and managing technical incidents under current IB procedures. The exact response may depend on the problem, the examination software, and the school's approved contingency arrangements. Students should not assume that time adjustments or a device change will happen automatically. Coordinators should brief candidates beforehand so they know whom to notify and what local procedure will be followed.

Can an MYP Individuals and Societies eAssessment be re-marked?

An on-screen examination may be eligible for re-marking through the IB's enquiry upon results process. The request must be submitted through the school, normally by the MYP coordinator, rather than directly by the student or family. A re-mark can produce a higher or lower grade, so the required consent must be obtained before the request is made. Fees, deadlines, and available services are governed by the assessment procedures for the relevant session. Students who are concerned about a result should contact their coordinator promptly and ask for an explanation of the available options.

Back to all posts

How MYP Individuals and Societies eAssessments Are Marked

MYP Individuals and Societies Assessment MYP Exam Tips

David G.

• 12 Sept 2026•8

How MYP Individuals and Societies eAssessments Are Marked

MYP Individuals and Societies eAssessments are on-screen examinations marked externally by trained IB examiners. Your teacher does not award the official examination mark, and the result is not based on moderation of your class. Examiners mark individual responses using IB markschemes, total the marks, and convert that total into a subject grade from 1 to 7.

This article explains the marking structure, criteria, grade conversion, and essential MYP eAssessment logistics.

Who marks the examination?

The official examination is individually, externally marked by examiners appointed by the IB. They follow approved markschemes and marking instructions rather than making a general judgment about the candidate's complete performance.

This differs from an ePortfolio, where teachers initially mark coursework and the IB moderates a sample. Classroom Individuals and Societies tasks also remain teacher-assessed, but those results do not replace the official examination grade. The IB outlines this distinction in its overview of MYP assessment and examinations.

How the 80 marks are distributed

The two-hour examination contains three broad tasks worth 80 marks. The published Individuals and Societies subject brief gives this structure:

Task	Criteria assessed	Marks
Investigating	A and B	26
Communicating	A and C	18
Thinking critically	A, C, and D	36
Total	All four criteria	80

Across the complete examination, each criterion contributes 20 marks:

Criterion A: Knowing and understanding -- used across all three tasks
Criterion B: Investigating -- assessed in the investigating task
Criterion C: Communicating -- assessed across two tasks
Criterion D: Thinking critically -- assessed in the final task

The criteria are equally weighted overall, even though the tasks have different totals and are not divided into four separate criterion sections.

How examiners award marks

Examiners mark response by response. A short source question may use a points-based markscheme awarding marks for specific accurate ideas. An extended response may use level-based instructions describing the analysis, evidence, evaluation, and judgment needed within each mark range.

For example, identifying information from a source requires accurate selection. Evaluating that source requires discussion of its value and limitations in relation to the stated purpose. A judgment question needs relevant evidence, consideration of perspectives, and a conclusion that directly answers the command term.

Students do not normally receive four classroom-style levels out of 8. Instead, criterion demands are embedded in individual questions and produce a total out of 80.

What the three tasks reward

Task	What a strong response demonstrates
Investigating	A suitable research question, justified methods, practical planning, and evaluation of the investigative process
Communicating	Accurate content presented effectively for the specified audience, purpose, and format
Thinking critically	Careful source analysis, comparison of perspectives, recognition of limitations, and a supported judgment

At 36 marks, thinking critically is the largest task. Description alone is therefore insufficient for a high overall result. Students need to explain relationships, weigh evidence, and show why their conclusion is justified.

Timed practice through the MYP Individuals and Societies Questionbank can help students recognize these differences.

How marks become a grade from 1 to 7

After marking, the total is converted into an official 1–7 subject grade. There is no permanent percentage that always guarantees a 7 because grade boundaries are established through the IB's grade-award process for the relevant examination session.

Students should not treat unofficial fixed boundaries as guaranteed. The authoritative outcome is the grade issued by the IB, as explained in its MYP grading and awards guidance.

For the full MYP certificate, students must earn at least grade 3 in every required eAssessment component, achieve at least 28 points out of 56, and meet the other certificate conditions. Grade 3 is a certificate requirement, not a fixed raw-mark boundary.

Exam-day logistics and result concerns

Schools manage secure administration, invigilation, candidate identification, approved equipment, access arrangements, and submission of response files. Students should follow their coordinator's instructions concerning arrival times, stationery, computer checks, and technical problems. The standard duration is two hours, as summarized in RevisionDojo's guide to MYP examination lengths.

If a result appears incorrect, the student must contact the school's MYP coordinator. Under the MYP general regulations, an enquiry upon results can cause an examination grade to increase or decrease. Current deadlines, fees, consent requirements, and available services must be checked through the school.

How to prepare for the marking model

Make assessable evidence visible. Answer the command term directly, use accurate terminology, support claims with sources or subject knowledge, and leave time for a developed conclusion.

A useful routine is to complete one timed response, compare it with the relevant criterion demands, identify where analysis becomes description, and rewrite the weakest paragraph. RevisionDojo's MYP eAssessment preparation guide, Individuals and Societies resources, and Jojo AI can support this process.

Conclusion

MYP Individuals and Societies eAssessments are externally marked out of 80, with each criterion contributing 20 marks overall. The total becomes a grade from 1 to 7, while schools manage examination-day procedures. RevisionDojo Study Notes, Questionbank practice, and Jojo AI can help students produce the investigation, communication, and evaluation that examiners reward.

Sources and referenced URLs

Task

Criteria assessed

Marks

Investigating

A and B

Communicating

A and C

Thinking critically

A, C, and D

Total

All four criteria

Task

What a strong response demonstrates

Investigating

A suitable research question, justified methods, practical planning, and evaluation of the investigative process

Communicating

Accurate content presented effectively for the specified audience, purpose, and format

Thinking critically

Careful source analysis, comparison of perspectives, recognition of limitations, and a supported judgment

How MYP Individuals and Societies eAssessments Are Marked