A counterexample disproves a universal statement by providing one valid case for which the statement is false. One counterexample is sufficient, but you must explain clearly why it contradicts the original claim.
This is part of IB Mathematics: Analysis and Approaches HL, AHL 1.15: proof by induction, contradiction and counterexamples, and may be tested on Paper 1 or Paper 2.
The Reasoning
A universal statement claims that a property holds for every permitted value. Symbolically, it has the form
To disprove it, select one value that satisfies the stated domain but makes false. Testing several examples that work does not prove the statement, while one example that fails disproves it completely.
Consider the claim:
For every , is prime.
Choose , which is permitted because . Then
This number is composite because it has factors other than and itself. Therefore, is a counterexample, so the original statement is false.
| Required step | What to write |
|---|---|
| Identify the domain | Confirm that the chosen value is permitted. |
| Substitute the value | Show the relevant calculation exactly. |
| Establish the contradiction | Explain why the result fails the claimed property. |
| State the conclusion | Conclude that the universal statement is false. |
A common misconception is that simply stating a value is enough. In AHL 1.15, the IB syllabus explicitly requires an explanation of why the example is a counterexample.
Exam Technique
For a command such as disprove, write the chosen value, verify that it belongs to the domain, show the calculation, and finish with an explicit conclusion. Do not attempt to prove the opposite statement generallyone fully justified counterexample earns the required reasoning credit.
