To convert from Cartesian form to polar form or Euler form, calculate the modulus and argument. To convert back, use the components and .
This is Mathematics: Analysis and Approaches HL content, , and may appear on Paper 1 or Paper 2.
To convert from Cartesian form to polar form or Euler form, calculate the modulus and argument. To convert back, use the components and .
This is Mathematics: Analysis and Approaches HL content, , and may appear on Paper 1 or Paper 2.
| Form | General expression |
|---|---|
| Cartesian | |
| Polar | |
| Euler |
For , calculate the modulus:
Then find the argument from . This ratio gives a reference angle, but tangent alone does not identify the quadrant. Use the signs of and to select the correct angle, normally in radians unless degrees are specified.
Then write or .
For ,
The point lies in quadrant II, so . Therefore,
Geometrically, Cartesian form gives horizontal and vertical components, while polar and Euler forms give distance from the origin and rotation from the positive real axis.
Use and . Hence,
For example, . Converting directly between polar and Euler form requires no new calculation because .
| Conversion | Required step |
|---|---|
| Cartesian to polar or Euler | Find and the quadrant-correct |
| Polar or Euler to Cartesian | Evaluate and |
| Polar to Euler | Replace with |
A common misconception is using without checking the quadrant. For example, and both give , but their arguments differ by .
The conversion also explains why each form is useful. Cartesian form is usually best for addition and subtraction, while polar or Euler form is usually best for multiplication, division, powers, and roots because moduli multiply or divide and arguments add or subtract.
In an IB response, show , justify , and state the correct form. Use exact values on Paper 1; on Paper 2, a GDC may find the angle, but the quadrant must be justified. If an argument range is given, obey it; otherwise arguments differ by .