Browse top scoring exemplars of IB Design Technology SL IA with SL/HL samples, examiner-style feedback, criteria breakdowns, and real student Internal Assessment exemplars.
The help center covers plans, billing, marking and troubleshooting, and you can message us from there.
Visit the help center
This page is designed to help you understand the assessment criteria for the IB Design Technology Standard Level (SL) Internal Assessment (IA). By breaking down the rubric and providing clear explanations, you'll be better equipped to evaluate your work. Additionally, a free embedded grader is available to assist you in self-assessing your IA efficiently.
Before you begin self-assessing your IA, ensure you have the following materials ready:
The Design Technology SL IA is assessed across four criteria, each contributing to your total score out of 36 marks.
What it tests: Your ability to identify and analyze a design problem or opportunity.
Performance Levels:
Common Mistakes:
Evidence to Show:
What it tests: Your ability to develop and explore design ideas.
Performance Levels:
Common Mistakes:
Evidence to Show:
What it tests: Your ability to refine a chosen concept into a detailed design.
Performance Levels:
Common Mistakes:
Evidence to Show:
What it tests: Your ability to test and evaluate the final design solution.
Performance Levels:
Common Mistakes:
Evidence to Show:
The embedded grader will provide a score for each criterion, summing up to a total out of 36. Here's how to interpret your overall score:
If you're between bands or uncertain:
Improvement Actions:
High-Band Excerpt:
"The design opportunity was identified through extensive market research, highlighting a gap in ergonomic office furniture. Objectives were clearly defined to address user comfort and sustainability."
Why it scores high: Demonstrates thorough analysis and clear objectives derived from research.
Mid/Low-Band Excerpt:
"A problem was found in office chairs. Some ideas were considered to make them better."
What's missing: Lacks detailed analysis and clear objectives; ideas are not well-developed.
Grade boundaries can vary by session. As of the latest data, the following boundaries apply:
| Total Marks | Grade |
|---|---|
| 0–5 | 1 |
| 6–10 | 2 |
| 11–15 | 3 |
| 16–19 | 4 |
| 20–23 | 5 |
| 24–27 | 6 |
| 28–36 | 7 |
The IA contributes 40% to your final Design Technology SL grade. Ensure your IA score aligns with your overall grade goals.
Q: How long should my IA report be?
A: While there's no strict word count, aim for clarity and conciseness, typically around 20–30 pages.
Q: Can I include digital models instead of physical prototypes?
A: Yes, digital models are acceptable, but ensure they are detailed and accurately represent your design.
Q: How important is user feedback in the IA?
A: User feedback is crucial as it demonstrates the practical application and effectiveness of your design.
Q: Should I include cost analysis in my IA?
A: While not mandatory, a basic cost analysis can strengthen your evaluation and feasibility assessment.
Q: How do I handle unsuccessful tests?
A: Document all tests, successful or not, and discuss what was learned and how it informs future improvements.
Q: Can I work on a group project for the IA?
A: The IA is an individual assessment; however, you can seek feedback from peers during the process.
Q: How detailed should my production plan be?
A: Provide enough detail that someone else could replicate your design based on your plan.
**Q: Is it necessary to consider environmental impact in my design
The help center covers plans, billing, marking and troubleshooting, and you can message us from there.
Visit the help center
Get annotated suggestions, strengths, and actionable feedback for your work.
View your feedback in the context of the subject rubric and broken down by criteria strands.
All files are deleted within 48 hours. We do not train on your data.
