The company you choose for your IB Business Management IA must be real, connected to a genuine business issue, and supported by enough recent evidence for meaningful analysis. The best choice is not necessarily a famous multinational. It is the organization that offers a focused issue, reliable data, contrasting perspectives, and opportunities to apply relevant business management tools.
Under the current course, SL and HL students complete a research project about a real issue or problem facing one organization. The project uses one conceptual lens: change, creativity, ethics, or sustainability. This guide explains how to evaluate a potential company before committing to it.
What the IB Business Management IA requires
The official IB subject briefs describe the internal assessment as a research project about a real business issue or problem facing a particular organization. It accounts for 30% at SL and 20% at HL, with approximately 20 hours allocated to the task.
Students produce a project of no more than 1,800 words, attach 3-5 supporting documents, and use one of the four key concepts. Research may be forward-looking or backward-looking and may use primary and/or secondary evidence. Your school should confirm submission details against the current subject guide.
Your company choice must therefore support more than background description. You need evidence that allows you to analyze a specific decision, strategy, problem, or outcome.
Criteria for choosing an analyzable company
Apply these tests before asking your teacher to approve your choice.
| Criterion | What a strong choice offers | Warning sign |
|---|---|---|
| Real issue | A documented decision, problem, or development | A hypothetical situation invented for the IA |
| Specific scope | One organization and one manageable issue | An entire industry or several equal case studies |
| Recent evidence | Several useful sources from the relevant period | Mostly old or undated material |
| Evidence variety | Corporate, independent, financial, or regulatory evidence | Sources repeating company publicity |
| Analytical potential | Data that can be interpreted using course tools | Company history and descriptive facts only |
| Conceptual fit | A natural link to change, creativity, ethics, or sustainability | A concept mentioned but not analyzed |
| Feasibility | Accessible sources that can be cited and attached | Paywalls, confidentiality, or unavailable data |
Do not choose the company until you can identify both the issue and the evidence. “I want to study Nike” is not enough. A focused investigation of a documented Nike decision, supported by corporate and independent evidence, is much more workable.
Choose an issue, not merely a company
A company name is not an IA topic. Subjects such as “marketing at Starbucks” or “Tesla’s growth” are too broad and usually encourage description.
A stronger research question identifies:
- the organization;
- a defined issue, action, or decision;
- an analytical focus;
- a relevant period where appropriate;
- one conceptual lens.
Possible starting points include:
- To what extent has Company A’s reusable packaging improved its environmental sustainability?
- Should Restaurant B expand its delivery operations in response to changing demand?
- To what extent did Retailer C’s pricing change improve its competitive position between 2024 and 2026?
These are models, not templates to copy. Your question must match the evidence that exists. The RevisionDojo Business Management IA guide explains how to refine the resulting structure.
Public company or local private business?
Public companies
Listed companies commonly publish annual reports, financial statements, investor presentations, regulatory filings, and press releases. They can suit questions involving profitability, expansion, investment, operations, strategy, or sustainability reporting.
Their scale creates a risk. A multinational may be too broad unless you define a product, market, division, or decision. Corporate reports also present management’s preferred narrative, so balance them with independent evidence.
Local or private businesses
A local restaurant, retailer, manufacturer, charity, or social enterprise may provide access to owners, employees, customers, and operational observations. This can produce distinctive primary evidence and a closely focused investigation.
However, private businesses may not publish accounts or market data. Confirm what information can be shared before committing. Access to a manager helps only if that person can provide evidence relevant to the research question.
Primary research is permitted, not universally required. A well-documented public company remains valid even if you cannot conduct an interview.
Where to find reliable company data
Begin with corporate and regulatory material, then add independent sources that test or contextualize company claims.
| Source | Useful evidence |
|---|---|
| Company investor-relations page | Annual reports, objectives, results, risks, and strategy updates |
| SEC EDGAR | US company annual, quarterly, and current filings |
| Companies House | UK filing histories, ownership details, and available accounts |
| SEDAR+ | Canadian financial statements and disclosure documents |
| Government agencies | Inflation, employment, demographic, trade, and industry data |
| Regulators and courts | Investigations, penalties, decisions, and compliance evidence |
| Reputable business news | Independent reporting and stakeholder perspectives |
Consult the original document rather than a search-result summary. Record its author, title, date, URL, relevant page numbers, and access date immediately. Official filings still require critical evaluation because registration services do not necessarily verify every statement submitted by a company.
Test the evidence before committing
Create an evidence map for each potential company. Identify 3-5 plausible supporting documents that are recent, directly relevant, and substantial enough to analyze.
A balanced provisional set might include:
- a company annual report or results announcement;
- an independent news or industry report;
- a government or regulatory source;
- an interview, survey, or customer dataset where appropriate;
- a contrasting stakeholder perspective.
Avoid selecting several short webpages that repeat one claim. Supporting documents should help you analyze consequences, stakeholder interests, limitations, and alternative interpretations. Current guidance generally limits supporting documents to material published within three years before submission, but confirm the applicable dates with your teacher.
Match the issue to suitable business tools
Start with the issue and evidence, then choose tools that help answer the question. Do not force every investigation into a SWOT analysis.
Useful connections include:
- expansion: Ansoff matrix, decision trees, investment appraisal, or force field analysis;
- profitability: ratio analysis, contribution, or break-even analysis;
- product portfolio: BCG matrix, sales data, and market-share analysis;
- workforce change: motivation theories, culture, and stakeholder analysis;
- sustainability: circular business models, stakeholder analysis, and cost-benefit reasoning.
A tool is valuable only when its output affects your judgment. Business Management Study Notes and the Business Management Questionbank can help you practise applying tools rather than merely reproducing them.
Common mistakes and final checks
Common mistakes include choosing a famous company without a narrow issue, relying entirely on company publications, selecting an issue with no measurable evidence, and assuming access to confidential information will appear later. Another frequent error is choosing tools first and forcing unsuitable evidence into them.
Before proceeding, confirm that:
- the organization and issue are real;
- the issue can be stated in one precise sentence;
- one key concept fits naturally;
- 3-5 recent supporting documents are available;
- sources provide data or contrasting perspectives;
- relevant syllabus tools can support analysis;
- a balanced judgment is possible within 1,800 words.
You can review Business Management IA examples to understand successful structure, but your question, evidence, analysis, and writing must remain your own.
Conclusion
The strongest IB Business Management IA company is attached to a focused, genuine issue and supported by accessible, recent, varied evidence. Public companies offer extensive filings, while local businesses may provide stronger primary access; neither is automatically superior.
Complete an evidence check before committing, confirm the conceptual lens, and select tools that genuinely support your judgment. RevisionDojo’s Business Management IA Grader, Study Notes, Questionbank, examples, and Jojo AI can help you review the plan alongside guidance from your teacher.
Sources and referenced URLs
- IB Business Management SL subject brief
- IB Business Management HL subject brief
- IB Business Management curriculum updates
- SEC EDGAR company filings
- Companies House company information
- SEDAR+ Canadian securities filings
- RevisionDojo Business Management IA guide
- RevisionDojo Business Management Study Notes
- RevisionDojo Business Management Questionbank
- RevisionDojo Business Management IA examples
- RevisionDojo Business Management IA Grader

