Comparison sits at the heart of IB History, but it is also one of the most misunderstood skills. Under the new IB DP History course (first assessment 2028), comparison is no longer an optional extra — it is a core method of historical inquiry.
Many students believe they are comparing when they place two examples side by side. In reality, this approach rarely scores highly. True comparison requires explanation, judgment, and conceptual focus.
This article explains how comparison actually works in IB History, how it is assessed under the new specification, and how students can use it effectively across exams and essays.
Quick Start Checklist
- What comparison means in IB History
- Why comparison matters more under FA 2028
- How examiners assess comparison
- Common comparison mistakes
- How to practise comparison effectively
Why Comparison Is Central to IB History
Under the first assessment 2028 specification, IB History is explicitly designed as a comparative, global course.
Comparison allows students to:
- Identify patterns across contexts
- Explain similarities and differences
- Apply historical concepts consistently
- Avoid narrow, single-case explanations
Comparison is how students demonstrate historical understanding, not just knowledge.
What Comparison Is (And What It Is Not)
True comparison involves:
- Identifying a point of similarity or difference
- Explaining why that similarity or difference exists
