Use the second derivative test at a stationary point, where . If , the point is a local maximum; if , it is a local minimum.
This is part of AHL 5.10: Second derivatives, testing for maximum and minimum, so it is Mathematics: Applications and Interpretation HL content.
The Mechanism
The first derivative gives the gradient. Solving identifies points where the tangent is horizontal, but this alone does not show whether each point is a maximum or minimum.
The second derivative describes the graph's concavity:
| Value of the second derivative | Classification |
|---|---|
| Concave down at , so ((a,f(a))) is a local maximum | |
Why does the sign work? Near a stationary point, a positive second derivative means the gradient is increasing through zero, so the graph changes from decreasing to increasing. A negative second derivative means the gradient is decreasing through zero, so the graph changes from increasing to decreasing.
For example, let
First find the stationary points:
Therefore, when or . Now differentiate again:
At , , so is a local maximum. At , , so is a local minimum.
The coordinate must include the function value, not only the x-value. Substituting each stationary x-value into gives the y-coordinate, which completes the classification.
A common misconception is that every solution of must be a maximum or minimum. This is false: a stationary point can also be a stationary point of inflexion.
Exam Technique
Show all three stages: solve , evaluate (f''(x)) at each solution, and state the classification with coordinates. If the question asks for a global maximum or minimum on a closed interval, also check the endpoints; the second derivative test classifies local stationary points only.
