Paper 2 is one of the most strategic components of IB Literature. Unlike Paper 1, which focuses on unseen analysis, Paper 2 asks you to compare two literary works you have studied in class. This exam tests your ability to think critically about similarities and differences between texts, analyze how authors express ideas, and craft a focused argument under timed conditions. With the right approach, Paper 2 becomes an opportunity to showcase your understanding of authorial choices, thematic development, and literary technique. The key is clear planning, purposeful comparisons, and confident use of evidence.

Why Paper 2 Requires a Different Strategy

Paper 2 is not about recounting plot or summarizing themes. It is about exploring how authors construct meaning. This means your comparisons must be rooted in technique—imagery, structure, narrative voice, tone—not surface-level observations. The examiners want to see how well you understand the mechanics of writing and how effectively you can evaluate different approaches to similar ideas. Because you choose the two works to compare, you have control over the direction of your argument, making it essential to know your texts deeply.

Quick Start Checklist

• Choose texts that connect clearly to the question.
• Identify 2 or 3 major comparative angles before writing.
• Use authorial choices—not plot summary—as evidence.
• Keep your comparisons balanced across both texts.
• Maintain a clear, consistent argument throughout.

Choosing the Best Texts for the Question

The first step in Paper 2 is selecting the right texts. You should choose works that naturally align with the question’s focus. If the question asks about identity, conflict, or structure, think about which texts give you the strongest material for that theme or technique. Avoid forcing a weak fit. Strong answers come from texts that allow you to discuss authorial choices in depth. Always choose the pair that gives you the clearest, most meaningful comparisons.

Planning Your Comparative Approach

Planning is essential. Spend five to seven minutes outlining your main points before writing. Identify two or three strong comparative ideas—such as how each author portrays power dynamics, uses narrative structure, or represents setting. These ideas will form the backbone of your essay. Keep in mind that you do not need to compare every feature of the texts; instead, focus on the most relevant connections to the question. A clear structure helps you maintain balance and avoid drifting into summary.

Writing Comparatively

A successful Paper 2 essay does not discuss Text A fully and then Text B fully. Instead, it integrates the two throughout. Each paragraph should compare both works, even if one receives slightly more emphasis. This approach shows examiners that you are thinking relationally rather than separately. Use linking phrases that highlight comparison, such as “Similarly,” “In contrast,” or “While Author A emphasizes…, Author B focuses on…” These transitions help your essay feel unified and controlled.

Evidence and Authorial Choices

Your argument must be grounded in textual evidence, but quotations in Paper 2 should be short and precise. Because you are writing from memory, focus on distinctive phrases, structural patterns, or stylistic markers. Always pair the evidence with clear commentary on authorial choice. Discuss why the writer uses a specific technique and how it contributes to meaning. Avoid relying on plot summary; descriptive writing is not analysis. The examiners reward essays that explain craft and interpretive effect with confidence.

Maintaining Balance

Balance is crucial in comparative essays. If one text dominates the majority of your essay, the comparison becomes uneven. Aim for consistent discussion of both texts in every paragraph. This does not mean giving them equal space at all times, but it does mean connecting each point to both works. Balanced comparison signals maturity in understanding how texts interact with each other.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many comparisons should I make?

You only need two or three major comparative ideas, each explored in depth. Quality always outweighs quantity. Superficial comparisons spread thinly across many paragraphs will feel unfocused. Deep analysis of a few well-chosen angles is far more effective.

Do I need to memorize quotations?

Memorizing short, vivid phrases or distinctive words is helpful, but you do not need long quotations. Focus on key images, stylistic features, or character-defining lines. If you cannot recall exact wording, describe the technique clearly rather than inventing lines.

Should I include context in Paper 2?

Yes, but only when it directly supports your argument. Context should clarify why an author makes certain choices, not serve as a history lesson. Keep it brief and relevant, always linking back to technique and meaning.

Conclusion

Approaching Paper 2 with clarity, strategy, and confidence makes a significant difference in your final grade. By choosing the right texts, planning purposeful comparisons, focusing on authorial choices, and maintaining balance, you produce essays that are analytical, insightful, and well-structured. With practice and the guidance provided by RevisionDojo, you can approach Paper 2 with confidence and write compelling arguments that fully meet IB expectations.