Predicted grades matter. They influence university applications, conditional offers, and student confidence — yet many IB Design Technology (DT) students are unclear about how these predictions are actually made. Because DT is not purely exam-based, predictions often feel more subjective than in other subjects.
In reality, DT grade predictions follow clear patterns. Once you understand what teachers look at, predictions become far more predictable — and controllable.
What Predicted Grades Are (and What They Aren’t)
A predicted grade is not:
- A guess
- A reward for effort
- A promise of your final result
Instead, it is a professional judgement based on evidence of how you are likely to perform at the end of the course, under exam conditions and with a completed IA.
Teachers are expected to be realistic, not optimistic.
The Two Main Sources of Evidence
DT predictions are usually based on two pillars:
- IA performance and progress
- Exam-style assessment performance
Strong predictions require consistency across both.
How the IA Influences Predicted Grades
The IA plays a major role in predictions because it shows:
- Design thinking
- Evaluation skill
- Independence
- Consistency over time
Teachers look closely at:
- The quality of your problem definition
- Strength of design requirements
- Evidence of iteration
- Depth of evaluation
A polished IA draft with weak thinking will not raise predictions. A clear, well-justified IA — even if incomplete — often will.
Why “Effort” Alone Doesn’t Raise Predictions
Many students believe working hard automatically leads to higher predictions. Teachers do notice effort, but marks are based on evidence, not intention.
Teachers ask:
- Does this student meet top-band criteria consistently?
- Can they justify decisions clearly?
- Do they evaluate honestly and effectively?
Effort without visible progress rarely changes predicted grades.
How Exams Affect DT Predicted Grades
Even with a strong IA, poor exam performance can cap predictions.
Teachers look at:
- Timed exam responses
- Use of command terms
- Application to scenarios
- Evaluation quality
Students who consistently write descriptive answers usually receive cautious predictions, even if their IA is strong.
Consistency Matters More Than Peaks
One excellent piece of work does not guarantee a high predicted grade.
Teachers value:
- Consistent performance
- Reliable exam technique
- Repeatable evaluation skills
Predictions reflect what a student can do reliably, not occasionally.
Common Reasons Predictions Are Lower Than Expected
Predicted grades are often lower because students:
- Rely too heavily on the IA
- Perform inconsistently in exams
- Avoid evaluation
- Leave thinking implicit rather than explained
These issues are fixable — but only if addressed early.
How Students Can Positively Influence Predictions
Students who improve predictions usually:
- Ask for specific feedback early
- Act clearly on that feedback
- Practise exam-style questions regularly
- Make their thinking explicit in writing
Teachers are far more confident predicting high grades when evidence is clear and repeatable.
What Doesn’t Influence Predictions Much
Predictions are rarely influenced by:
- Product appearance
- Creativity alone
- How much time you spent
- How stressed you feel
Predictions are about outcomes and skills, not process behind the scenes.
When Predictions Are Finalised
Most schools finalise predictions:
- After substantial IA progress
- Once multiple exam-style assessments are completed
Last-minute improvements can help, but early consistency matters far more.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a strong IA guarantee a high predicted grade?
No. Exams still matter. Predictions reflect performance across both components.
Can predictions change later?
Sometimes, but changes require clear new evidence — not promises.
Should I ask my teacher about my predicted grade?
Yes, but ask what evidence would raise it, not just what it is.
Final Thoughts
IB Design Technology predicted grades are not mysterious. They are based on clear evidence of thinking, evaluation, and consistency. Students who understand this early and align their work accordingly give themselves the best chance of strong predictions — and strong final results.
Predictions reward clarity and reliability, not last-minute effort.
RevisionDojo Tip
RevisionDojo is the best platform for IB Design Technology students aiming to improve predicted grades. By strengthening IA clarity, building exam-ready evaluation skills, and aligning work with assessment criteria, RevisionDojo helps students produce the kind of evidence teachers need to confidently predict top grades.
