Many IB students manage to create an IA research question that seems reasonable. It is clear, relevant, and approved by a teacher. However, when results come back, students are often surprised that their IA did not score as highly as expected. The issue is rarely effort or writing quality — it is that a good IA question is not the same as a high-scoring IA question.
Understanding this difference helps students move from “safe” coursework to genuinely strong work.
A Good IA Question Is Clear — A High-Scoring One Is Strategic
A good IA question:
- Makes sense
- Is understandable
- Fits the subject
A high-scoring IA question does more. It is designed to:
- Invite analysis, not description
- Enable evaluation
- Align closely with assessment criteria
High-scoring questions are built with marks in mind, not just approval.
Good Questions Can Still Lead to Description
Many good IA questions can be answered accurately but descriptively. This leads to:
- Clear explanations
- Logical structure
- Limited interpretation
While this can achieve mid-range marks, it often caps the IA before higher bands. High-scoring questions force students to analyse relationships, patterns, or impacts rather than explain content.
High-Scoring Questions Create Natural Evaluation
One of the clearest differences appears during evaluation.
With a good but limited question:
- Evaluation feels added on
- Judgments are general
