Introduction
The Internal Assessment (IA) isn’t only about content — presentation also matters. While examiners don’t give marks for design alone, formatting errors can affect clarity, credibility, and overall impression. A poorly formatted IA looks rushed, even if the analysis is strong, and this can hold back your grade.
In this article, we’ll look at the most common formatting errors that lower IA marks, explain why they matter, and share practical tips for presenting your IA like a professional. For models of well-formatted IAs, check RevisionDojo’s coursework exemplars.
Quick Start Checklist: IA Formatting Essentials
- Clear, consistent headings and subheadings
- Properly formatted citations and bibliography
- Well-labeled graphs and tables with units
- Consistent font, size, and spacing
- Appendices for raw data, not the main body
Error 1: Inconsistent Headings and Structure
Some students use random headings or fail to divide their IA into clear sections. Examiners expect a logical flow:
- Introduction
- Methodology
- Analysis
- Evaluation
- Conclusion
Consistent formatting for headings (e.g., bold, same size) makes your IA easier to navigate.
Error 2: Poorly Labeled Graphs and Tables
Graphs and tables must be clear, or examiners won’t take them seriously. Common mistakes include:
- Missing titles or axis labels
- Units not shown
- Overcrowded tables with unreadable data
- Graphs inserted without explanation in the text
