1. EdTech vs. Traditional Teaching: Can It Replace It Entirely?
Despite rapid growth, EdTech cannot fully replace traditional classrooms. Studies have shown that while platforms like MOOCs and interactive learning tools can democratize access, they lack the human interaction and mentorship that physical classrooms provide.
Technology amplifies learning, but schools and universities still rely on teachers for guidance, feedback, and emotional support.
2. What Research Shows About EdTech's Effectiveness
A randomized trial involving students in Russia revealed strong outcomes when EdTech (computer-assisted learning) replaced low levels of traditional teaching, but its benefits plateaued or even declined at higher usage levels—especially without strategic integration.
Conversely, when EdTech is used within a blended learning framework—combining online content with in-person instruction—it demonstrates enhanced student achievement and engagement.
3. What Educators and Universities Are Doing
Many institutions are not eliminating in-person teaching—even if some shifts are underway:
- Adelaide University (Australia) has announced that starting 2026, face-to-face lectures will be largely discontinued—but this has sparked backlash over possible loss of connection and mentorship.
- Universities worldwide are increasingly embracing flipped classroom models, where students learn theory online and engage in active, hands-on problem solving in physical classes.
- Educational experts emphasize that active, technology-enhanced learning (TEAL) often delivers better outcomes than traditional lectures, especially in small cohorts.
5. Why Blended Learning Is the Sweet Spot
Blended learning integrates the strengths of both models:
