Why does the equilibrium position favor the side with lower energy?
The equilibrium position favors the side with lower energy because chemical systems naturally shift toward the most stable, lowest-energy arrangement available. When reactants convert into products, the system seeks a balance between enthalpy (energy changes) and entropy (disorder). The combination of these factors determines which side — reactants or products — is energetically more favorable. Whichever side results in lower overall free energy becomes the dominant side at equilibrium.
A key concept behind this is the Gibbs free energy change, ΔG. When ΔG is negative, products are more stable than reactants, so the equilibrium position lies to the right. When ΔG is positive, reactants are more stable, and the equilibrium lies to the left. For equilibrium itself, ΔG = 0, meaning the system has reached the lowest possible free energy under the given conditions, with the forward and reverse reactions balanced.
Even in reactions where enthalpy (ΔH) is the main driver, stability plays a critical role. If forming the products releases significant energy — indicating strong, stable bonds — the products are lower in energy and will be favored at equilibrium. Conversely, if breaking reactant bonds requires more energy than the new bonds provide, the reactants remain the more stable side.
Entropy also contributes. A reaction that increases disorder (for example, reactions forming gases) is often favored because systems naturally tend toward higher entropy. Even if a reaction is slightly endothermic, an increase in entropy can make the products energetically more favorable overall. This interplay between enthalpy and entropy determines the final equilibrium position.
At equilibrium, the system has minimized free energy — not stopped reacting. Both sides continue to interconvert, but the lower-energy side dominates because it is thermodynamically preferred. This is why the equilibrium constant, K, becomes large when products are favored and small when reactants are favored.
Ultimately, equilibrium favors the lower-energy side because chemical systems inherently move toward maximum stability and minimum free energy. Once this point is reached, the reaction settles into a balanced, dynamic state where the most stable arrangement prevails.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does a lower-energy side always mean more product?
Only if the products are lower in free energy than the reactants. Otherwise, equilibrium favors the reactants.
Can temperature change which side is lower energy?
Yes. Temperature affects entropy’s contribution and can shift equilibrium toward either side.
Does a large K value always mean products are much more stable?
Usually, yes — a large equilibrium constant indicates the reaction strongly favors the lower-energy products.
RevisionDojo Call to Action
Want equilibrium, Gibbs free energy and stability to finally make sense? RevisionDojo teaches IB Chemistry with clear, intuitive explanations so you understand the “why” behind every equilibrium shift.
