Computer Science IA Grader
- Lots of students struggle to decode their IB Computer Science Internal Assessment grade and assessment.
- This is a free grading tool that breaks down the IB Computer Science IA rubric into plain English, so you understand exactly where your programming project stands across all five assessment criteria.
- The embedded grader makes self-evaluation faster and more accurate than manual rubric checking, so you're never left guessing.
Quick Start Checklist
- Before using the grader, ensure you understand these key elements:
- Research Question - Clear, focused question directly related to World Religions that allows for meaningful investigation
- Primary Sources - Religious texts, interviews, observations, or firsthand religious materials
- Secondary Sources - Academic books, journal articles, and scholarly commentaries on religious topics
- Methodology - Clear explanation of research approach (textual analysis, ethnographic study, comparative analysis)
- Religious Terminology - Accurate use of specific religious vocabulary and concepts
- Cultural Sensitivity - Respectful and appropriate treatment of religious beliefs and practices
- Word Count Verification - Maximum 4,000 words (excluding bibliography and appendices)
- Ethical Considerations - Evidence of respectful approach to religious communities and beliefs
Rubric Breakdown
The IB Computer Science Internal Assessment (IA) is assessed using five criteria, totaling 34 marks.
Criterion A: Planning (6 marks)
- This criterion tests your ability to identify and analyze a real-world computational problem.
- It evaluates your problem definition, client identification, and success criteria establishment.
Mark Band | What it Means | Evidence You Must Show |
---|---|---|
5-6 | Comprehensive problem identification and planning | Detailed problem description, client identification, and clear success criteria |
3-4 | Adequate problem identification and planning | General problem description with some success criteria |
1-2 | Limited problem identification and planning | Vague problem description and unclear success criteria |
0 | No relevant planning | No evidence of problem identification or planning |
Criterion B: Record of Tasks and Design (6 marks)
- This evaluates your documentation of the development process and solution design.
- It tests your planning methodology and design documentation quality.
Mark Band | What it Means | Evidence You Must Show |
---|---|---|
5-6 | Detailed records and comprehensive design | Complete Record of Tasks and thorough design documentation with diagrams |
3-4 | Adequate records and design | Partial Record of Tasks and basic design documentation |
1-2 | Limited records and design | Incomplete Record of Tasks and minimal design documentation |
0 | No relevant records or design | No evidence of Record of Tasks or design documentation |
Criterion C: Development (12 marks)
- This assesses the technical complexity and quality of your programming solution.
- It tests your coding skills, use of appropriate techniques, and computational thinking.
Mark Band | What it Means | Evidence You Must Show |
---|---|---|
10-12 | Highly complex and technically sound solution | Advanced coding techniques, appropriate use of tools, and clear explanations |
7-9 | Moderately complex and technically sound solution | Intermediate coding techniques and use of tools with explanations |
4-6 | Basic solution with limited complexity | Simple coding techniques and minimal use of tools |
1-3 | Minimal development with little technical merit | Very basic coding with little to no use of tools |
0 | No development | No evidence of a developed solution |
Criterion D: Functionality (4 marks)
- This tests how well your solution works and meets the defined success criteria.
- It evaluates the effectiveness and performance of your implemented solution.
Mark Band | What it Means | Evidence You Must Show |
---|---|---|
4 | Fully functional product meeting all criteria | Clear video demonstration of all features and performance |
3 | Mostly functional product meeting most criteria | Video showing most features and performance |
2 | Partially functional product meeting some criteria | Video showing some features and performance |
1 | Minimally functional product | Video showing limited features and performance |
0 | Non-functional product | No video or evidence of functionality |
Criterion E: Evaluation (6 marks)
- This assesses your ability to critically evaluate your solution and development process.
- It evaluates client feedback integration and identification of improvements.
Mark Band | What it Means | Evidence You Must Show |
---|---|---|
5-6 | Comprehensive evaluation with client feedback | Detailed assessment against success criteria and documented client feedback |
3-4 | Adequate evaluation with some client feedback | General assessment against success criteria and some client feedback |
1-2 | Limited evaluation with minimal client feedback | Basic assessment against success criteria and little client feedback |
0 | No evaluation | No evidence of evaluation or client feedback |
Computer Science IA Grade Boundaries
Total Marks | Grade |
---|---|
29-34 | 7 |
25-28 | 6 |
22-24 | 5 |
18-21 | 4 |
14-17 | 3 |
7-13 | 2 |
0-6 | 1 |
- The embedded grading tool calculates your total score out of 34 marks across all five criteria.
- Here's how to interpret your results:
- 30-34 marks (7 territory): Excellent programming project with sophisticated technical implementation. Minor refinements needed.
- 26-29 marks (6 range): Strong project with good programming skills. Focus on increasing technical complexity and client engagement.
- 22-25 marks (5 level): Competent work meeting basic requirements. Strengthen programming techniques and solution complexity.
- 18-21 marks (4 range): Adequate foundation but needs significant improvement. Review technical implementation and functionality.
- 14-17 marks (3 level): Poor work with major weaknesses. Requires substantial revision of programming approach.
- Below 14 marks: Major revision required across most criteria. Reconsider problem definition and technical approach.
Subject-Specific Tips
- Problem Selection:
- Choose real-world problems that require computational solutions and have genuine clients.
- Ensure problems are complex enough to demonstrate advanced programming techniques.
- Technical Complexity:
- Implement advanced algorithms (sorting, searching, graph algorithms, machine learning).
- Use sophisticated data structures (trees, graphs, hash tables, databases).
- Programming Excellence:
- Write clean, well-documented code with meaningful variable names and comments.
- Follow object-oriented programming principles where appropriate.
- Client Engagement:
- Maintain regular contact with your client throughout the development process.
- Document all client interactions and incorporate feedback into iterative development.
- Testing Strategy:
- Implement comprehensive testing including unit tests, integration tests, and user acceptance tests.
- Document all bugs found and demonstrate systematic debugging process.
Common Programming Projects That Work Well
- Database Applications:
- Inventory management systems with complex queries
- Student information systems with role-based access
- Library management with recommendation algorithms
- E-commerce platforms with payment integration
- Algorithm Implementation:
- Route optimization for delivery services
- Scheduling systems using graph algorithms
- Data analysis tools with statistical algorithms
- Game AI with minimax or neural networks
- Web Applications:
- Social media platforms with real-time features
- Educational tools with progress tracking
- Booking systems with conflict resolution
- Content management with search functionality
- Mobile Applications:
- Fitness tracking with data visualization
- Language learning with spaced repetition
- Navigation apps with GPS integration
- Productivity tools with synchronization
- Data Processing:
- Log analysis tools for system monitoring
- Financial modeling with risk analysis
- Scientific data visualization
- Machine learning classification systems
Common Mistake
Common Mistakes & Fast Fixes
- Vague problem statement → Define specific, measurable problems with clear computational requirements.
- Fake or absent client → Identify real users who will benefit from and test your solution.
- Incomplete Record of Tasks → Maintain detailed logs throughout development, not just at the end.
- Trivial programming techniques → Implement advanced algorithms, data structures, and design patterns.
- Non-functional demonstration → Test thoroughly and create clear video showing all features working.
- Missing client feedback → Document regular client interactions and incorporate feedback iteratively.
- Superficial evaluation → Critically assess against each success criterion with specific evidence.
- Poor code quality → Write clean, commented, well-structured code following best practices.
FAQs
- How complex should my programming solution be?
- Aim for advanced techniques like sophisticated algorithms, complex data structures, or integration of multiple technologies. Simple CRUD applications rarely score highly.
- Do I need a real client?
- Yes, you need a genuine person or organization who will use your solution. Family members, teachers, or local businesses can serve as clients.
- How detailed should my Record of Tasks be?
- Document all major decisions, design changes, coding sessions, testing phases, and client interactions with dates and specific details.
- Can I use existing frameworks and libraries?
- Yes, but ensure your own contribution is substantial and technically sophisticated. Simply configuring existing tools isn't sufficient.
- What if my client can't provide detailed feedback?
- Guide your client with specific questions about functionality, usability, and performance. Document their responses and how you addressed their concerns.
- Should I include all my code in the appendix?
- Include complete, well-commented code that demonstrates your technical skills. Organize it clearly and reference key sections in your main report.
- How important is the functionality video?
- Critical - it's your only opportunity to demonstrate that your solution actually works. Show all features clearly and explain their operation.
- What constitutes appropriate testing?
- Test normal use cases, edge cases, error conditions, and performance under load. Document test plans, expected results, and actual outcomes.
Use the Free Computer Science IA Grader Now
- Stop guessing about your grade.
- This comprehensive grading tool evaluates your Computer Science IA against all five official criteria, giving instant feedback on strengths and improvement areas.
- Input your project details and get a preliminary grade calculation that helps you focus revision efforts where they matter most.
- Computer Science-specific analysis helps you master the programming complexity and client engagement that separate excellent from average Computer Science IAs.