Coursework banner

IB Computer Science IA

Get instant AI-powered feedback on your IB Computer Science IA coursework with detailed assessment based on official marking criteria

IB Computer Science IA Assessment Guide

Computer Science IA Grader

  1. Lots of students struggle to decode their IB Computer Science Internal Assessment grade and assessment.
  2. This is a free grading tool that breaks down the IB Computer Science IA rubric into plain English, so you understand exactly where your programming project stands across all five assessment criteria.
  3. The embedded grader makes self-evaluation faster and more accurate than manual rubric checking, so you're never left guessing.

Quick Start Checklist

  1. Before using the grader, ensure you understand these key elements:
    1. Research Question - Clear, focused question directly related to World Religions that allows for meaningful investigation
    2. Primary Sources - Religious texts, interviews, observations, or firsthand religious materials
    3. Secondary Sources - Academic books, journal articles, and scholarly commentaries on religious topics
    4. Methodology - Clear explanation of research approach (textual analysis, ethnographic study, comparative analysis)
    5. Religious Terminology - Accurate use of specific religious vocabulary and concepts
    6. Cultural Sensitivity - Respectful and appropriate treatment of religious beliefs and practices
    7. Word Count Verification - Maximum 4,000 words (excluding bibliography and appendices)
    8. Ethical Considerations - Evidence of respectful approach to religious communities and beliefs

Rubric Breakdown

The IB Computer Science Internal Assessment (IA) is assessed using five criteria, totaling 34 marks.

Criterion A: Planning (6 marks)

  1. This criterion tests your ability to identify and analyze a real-world computational problem.
  2. It evaluates your problem definition, client identification, and success criteria establishment.
Mark BandWhat it MeansEvidence You Must Show
5-6Comprehensive problem identification and planningDetailed problem description, client identification, and clear success criteria
3-4Adequate problem identification and planningGeneral problem description with some success criteria
1-2Limited problem identification and planningVague problem description and unclear success criteria
0No relevant planningNo evidence of problem identification or planning

Criterion B: Record of Tasks and Design (6 marks)

  1. This evaluates your documentation of the development process and solution design.
  2. It tests your planning methodology and design documentation quality.
Mark BandWhat it MeansEvidence You Must Show
5-6Detailed records and comprehensive designComplete Record of Tasks and thorough design documentation with diagrams
3-4Adequate records and designPartial Record of Tasks and basic design documentation
1-2Limited records and designIncomplete Record of Tasks and minimal design documentation
0No relevant records or designNo evidence of Record of Tasks or design documentation

Criterion C: Development (12 marks)

  1. This assesses the technical complexity and quality of your programming solution.
  2. It tests your coding skills, use of appropriate techniques, and computational thinking.
Mark BandWhat it MeansEvidence You Must Show
10-12Highly complex and technically sound solutionAdvanced coding techniques, appropriate use of tools, and clear explanations
7-9Moderately complex and technically sound solutionIntermediate coding techniques and use of tools with explanations
4-6Basic solution with limited complexitySimple coding techniques and minimal use of tools
1-3Minimal development with little technical meritVery basic coding with little to no use of tools
0No developmentNo evidence of a developed solution

Criterion D: Functionality (4 marks)

  1. This tests how well your solution works and meets the defined success criteria.
  2. It evaluates the effectiveness and performance of your implemented solution.
Mark BandWhat it MeansEvidence You Must Show
4Fully functional product meeting all criteriaClear video demonstration of all features and performance
3Mostly functional product meeting most criteriaVideo showing most features and performance
2Partially functional product meeting some criteriaVideo showing some features and performance
1Minimally functional productVideo showing limited features and performance
0Non-functional productNo video or evidence of functionality

Criterion E: Evaluation (6 marks)

  1. This assesses your ability to critically evaluate your solution and development process.
  2. It evaluates client feedback integration and identification of improvements.
Mark BandWhat it MeansEvidence You Must Show
5-6Comprehensive evaluation with client feedbackDetailed assessment against success criteria and documented client feedback
3-4Adequate evaluation with some client feedbackGeneral assessment against success criteria and some client feedback
1-2Limited evaluation with minimal client feedbackBasic assessment against success criteria and little client feedback
0No evaluationNo evidence of evaluation or client feedback

Computer Science IA Grade Boundaries

Total MarksGrade
29-347
25-286
22-245
18-214
14-173
7-132
0-61
  1. The embedded grading tool calculates your total score out of 34 marks across all five criteria.
  2. Here's how to interpret your results:
    1. 30-34 marks (7 territory): Excellent programming project with sophisticated technical implementation. Minor refinements needed.
    2. 26-29 marks (6 range): Strong project with good programming skills. Focus on increasing technical complexity and client engagement.
    3. 22-25 marks (5 level): Competent work meeting basic requirements. Strengthen programming techniques and solution complexity.
    4. 18-21 marks (4 range): Adequate foundation but needs significant improvement. Review technical implementation and functionality.
    5. 14-17 marks (3 level): Poor work with major weaknesses. Requires substantial revision of programming approach.
    6. Below 14 marks: Major revision required across most criteria. Reconsider problem definition and technical approach.

Subject-Specific Tips

  1. Problem Selection:
    1. Choose real-world problems that require computational solutions and have genuine clients.
    2. Ensure problems are complex enough to demonstrate advanced programming techniques.
  2. Technical Complexity:
    1. Implement advanced algorithms (sorting, searching, graph algorithms, machine learning).
    2. Use sophisticated data structures (trees, graphs, hash tables, databases).
  3. Programming Excellence:
    1. Write clean, well-documented code with meaningful variable names and comments.
    2. Follow object-oriented programming principles where appropriate.
  4. Client Engagement:
    1. Maintain regular contact with your client throughout the development process.
    2. Document all client interactions and incorporate feedback into iterative development.
  5. Testing Strategy:
    1. Implement comprehensive testing including unit tests, integration tests, and user acceptance tests.
    2. Document all bugs found and demonstrate systematic debugging process.

Common Programming Projects That Work Well

  1. Database Applications:
    1. Inventory management systems with complex queries
    2. Student information systems with role-based access
    3. Library management with recommendation algorithms
    4. E-commerce platforms with payment integration
  2. Algorithm Implementation:
    1. Route optimization for delivery services
    2. Scheduling systems using graph algorithms
    3. Data analysis tools with statistical algorithms
    4. Game AI with minimax or neural networks
  3. Web Applications:
    1. Social media platforms with real-time features
    2. Educational tools with progress tracking
    3. Booking systems with conflict resolution
    4. Content management with search functionality
  4. Mobile Applications:
    1. Fitness tracking with data visualization
    2. Language learning with spaced repetition
    3. Navigation apps with GPS integration
    4. Productivity tools with synchronization
  5. Data Processing:
    1. Log analysis tools for system monitoring
    2. Financial modeling with risk analysis
    3. Scientific data visualization
    4. Machine learning classification systems

Common Mistake

Common Mistakes & Fast Fixes

  • Vague problem statement → Define specific, measurable problems with clear computational requirements.
  • Fake or absent client → Identify real users who will benefit from and test your solution.
  • Incomplete Record of Tasks → Maintain detailed logs throughout development, not just at the end.
  • Trivial programming techniques → Implement advanced algorithms, data structures, and design patterns.
  • Non-functional demonstration → Test thoroughly and create clear video showing all features working.
  • Missing client feedback → Document regular client interactions and incorporate feedback iteratively.
  • Superficial evaluation → Critically assess against each success criterion with specific evidence.
  • Poor code quality → Write clean, commented, well-structured code following best practices.

FAQs

  1. How complex should my programming solution be?
    1. Aim for advanced techniques like sophisticated algorithms, complex data structures, or integration of multiple technologies. Simple CRUD applications rarely score highly.
  2. Do I need a real client?
    1. Yes, you need a genuine person or organization who will use your solution. Family members, teachers, or local businesses can serve as clients.
  3. How detailed should my Record of Tasks be?
    1. Document all major decisions, design changes, coding sessions, testing phases, and client interactions with dates and specific details.
  4. Can I use existing frameworks and libraries?
    1. Yes, but ensure your own contribution is substantial and technically sophisticated. Simply configuring existing tools isn't sufficient.
  5. What if my client can't provide detailed feedback?
    1. Guide your client with specific questions about functionality, usability, and performance. Document their responses and how you addressed their concerns.
  6. Should I include all my code in the appendix?
    1. Include complete, well-commented code that demonstrates your technical skills. Organize it clearly and reference key sections in your main report.
  7. How important is the functionality video?
    1. Critical - it's your only opportunity to demonstrate that your solution actually works. Show all features clearly and explain their operation.
  8. What constitutes appropriate testing?
    1. Test normal use cases, edge cases, error conditions, and performance under load. Document test plans, expected results, and actual outcomes.

Use the Free Computer Science IA Grader Now

  1. Stop guessing about your grade.
  2. This comprehensive grading tool evaluates your Computer Science IA against all five official criteria, giving instant feedback on strengths and improvement areas.
  3. Input your project details and get a preliminary grade calculation that helps you focus revision efforts where they matter most.
  4. Computer Science-specific analysis helps you master the programming complexity and client engagement that separate excellent from average Computer Science IAs.

IB Computer Science IA AI Grader Tool

1
Select grading rubric and level
2
Select coursework progress
3
Configure submission settings
4
Upload your coursework
5
Select report type
6
Confirm your privacy settings

How the IB Computer Science IA Grader Works and Frequently Asked Questions

Why Use Our Coursework Grader?

Comprehensive Feedback

Get annotated suggestions, strengths, and actionable feedback for your work.

Subject specific rubrics

View your feedback in the context of the subject rubric and broken down bycriteria strands.

Secure by design

All files are deleted within 48h. We do not train on your data.

Frequently Asked Questions

Join 350k+ Students Already Crushing Their Exams