Coursework banner

IB TOK Exhibition

Get instant AI-powered feedback on your IB TOK Exhibition coursework with detailed assessment based on official marking criteria

IB TOK Exhibition Assessment Guide

IB Theory of Knowledge (TOK) Exhibition Grader

  1. Lots of students struggle to decode their Theory of Knowledge Exhibition grade and assessment.
  2. This is a free grading tool that breaks down the IB TOK Exhibition rubric into plain English, so you understand exactly where your three-object exhibition stands based on the single holistic assessment.
  3. The embedded grader makes self-evaluation faster and more accurate than manual rubric checking, so you're never left guessing.

Note

The grader works in two modes:

  • Draft Mode: Quick assessment of your work-in-progress. Input your current objects and commentary and get instant feedback on areas that need more work before you finish.
  • Full Mode: Complete evaluation of your finished exhibition. Input your final exhibition details and get a comprehensive grade breakdown with specific improvement suggestions.

Quick Start Checklist

  1. Before using the grader, ensure you have these key elements ready:
    1. Three Objects - Three distinct objects with specific real-world contexts clearly identified
    2. IA Prompt Selection - Clear selection of one IA prompt from the official IB list
    3. Object-Prompt Links - Clear connections between each object and the selected IA prompt
    4. Real-World Contexts - Specific contexts for each object rather than generic descriptions
    5. Strong Justification - Clear explanation of how each object contributes to the exhibition
    6. Evidence and References - Appropriate evidence and references to the selected IA prompt
    7. Word Count Management - 950 words maximum (approximately 300 words per object)
    8. Visual Documentation - Clear images of each object with proper identification

Rubric Breakdown

The single assessment question is: Does the exhibition successfully show how TOK manifests in the world around us?
  1. This single driving question underpins the entire assessment of your TOK Exhibition.
  2. The assessment uses five performance levels as holistic descriptors rather than separate criteria.
Mark BandPerformance LevelEvidence you must show
9-10ExcellentClearly identifies three objects and their specific real-world contexts; Links between each object and selected IA prompt are clearly made and well-explained; Strong justification of particular contribution that each individual object makes to exhibition; All or nearly all points are well-supported by appropriate evidence and explicit references to selected IA prompt
7-8GoodIdentifies three objects and their real-world contexts; Links between each object and selected IA prompt are explained, although explanation may lack precision and clarity in parts; Justification of contribution that each individual object makes to exhibition; Many points are supported by appropriate evidence and references to selected IA prompt
5-6SatisfactoryIdentifies three objects, although real-world contexts of these objects may be vague or imprecisely stated; Some explanation of links between three objects and selected IA prompt; Some justification for inclusion of each object in exhibition; Some points are supported by evidence and references to selected IA prompt
3-4BasicIdentifies three objects, although real-world contexts of objects may be implied rather than explicitly stated; Basic links between objects and selected IA prompt are made, but explanation of these links is unconvincing and/or unfocused; Superficial justification for inclusion of each object in exhibition; Reasons for inclusion of objects are offered, but these are not supported by appropriate evidence and/or lack relevance to selected IA prompt; Significant repetition across justifications of different objects
1-2RudimentaryPresents three objects, but real-world contexts of these objects are not stated, or the images presented may be highly generic images of types of object rather than specific real-world objects; Links between objects and selected IA prompt are made, but these are minimal, tenuous, or unclear what the student is trying to convey; Very little justification offered for inclusion of each object in exhibition; Commentary on objects is highly descriptive or consists only of unsupported assertions
0No standardExhibition does not reach the standard described by other levels or does not use one of the IA prompts provided

How to Interpret Your Grade from the Tool

  1. The embedded grader calculates your total score out of 10 marks based on the single holistic assessment.
  2. Here's how to interpret your results:
    1. 9-10 marks (Excellent): Outstanding exhibition with clear object identification, strong IA prompt connections, and well-supported justifications.
    2. 7-8 marks (Good): Strong exhibition with good object contexts and explained links to IA prompt.
    3. 5-6 marks (Satisfactory): Competent exhibition with adequate connections but may lack precision in contexts or explanations.
    4. 3-4 marks (Basic): Limited exhibition with basic connections and superficial justifications. Significant improvement needed.
    5. 1-2 marks (Rudimentary): Weak exhibition with unclear contexts and minimal connections. Major revision required.
    6. 0 marks: Does not meet basic standards or does not use official IA prompt.

Tip

  • Your TOK Essay (10 marks) combines with TOK Exhibition (10 marks) for total TOK grade.
  • It is marked out of a total of 30, with your TOK essay counted twice.
  • Your final TOK grade combines with EE grade to contribute up to 3 bonus points to your total IB score.

Object Selection Tips

Effective Object Types

  1. Personal artifactsFamily photographs, handwritten documents, inherited items, personal creations
  2. Local/specific itemsNewspaper clippings, museum exhibits, architectural features, community artifacts
  3. Contemporary examplesSocial media posts, medical documents, scientific instruments, artistic works

Object Context Requirements

  1. Specific locationParticular place, institution, community rather than general location
  2. Temporal specificityExact dates, historical periods, specific events rather than vague timeframes
  3. Personal connectionYour relationship to object or access to specific context

Exhibition Structure Guide

  1. Object 1 Commentary (≈300 words): Object identification → Specific context → IA prompt connection → Justification → Supporting evidence
  2. Object 2 Commentary (≈300 words): Object identification → Specific context → Different IA prompt angle → Unique justification → Evidence support
  3. Object 3 Commentary (≈300 words): Object identification → Specific context → Third perspective → Complementary justification → Evidence integration
  4. Overall Coherence (≈50 words): Exhibition unity → Prompt exploration → Collective significance → TOK understanding demonstration

FAQs

  1. Can I use the same object for different prompts?
    1. No - each exhibition must use three different objects for one specific IA prompt.
  2. What makes a context 'specific'?
    1. Particular details about where, when, how you encountered or know about the object.
  3. Should all objects connect differently to the prompt?
    1. Yes - each object should offer unique perspective or angle on the chosen IA prompt.
  4. Can I use digital objects?
    1. Yes - specific social media posts, websites, digital documents with clear contexts.
  5. How detailed should object descriptions be?
    1. Enough detail to establish specific context but focus on analysis rather than pure description.
  6. What if I can't photograph my object?
    1. Explain circumstances and provide detailed description with alternative documentation if possible.
  7. Should I include personal opinions?
    1. Personal insights are valuable if they support analysis and connect to TOK concepts.
  8. How do I avoid repetition across objects?
    1. Plan different angles on IA prompt - various perspectives, contrasting examples, complementary aspects.
  9. What makes justification 'strong'?
    1. Clear reasoning, appropriate evidence, explicit IA prompt connections, thoughtful analysis.
  10. Can objects be from different time periods?
    1. Yes - temporal diversity can strengthen exhibition by showing knowledge evolution or persistence.

Use the Free TOK Exhibition Grader Now

  1. Stop guessing about your grade.
  2. The comprehensive grading tool evaluates your exhibition against the official holistic assessment, giving instant feedback on strengths and improvement areas.
  3. Input your exhibition details and get a preliminary grade calculation that helps you focus revision efforts where they matter most.
  4. TOK Exhibition-specific analysis helps you master the object selection and prompt connections that separate excellent from average Theory of Knowledge Exhibitions.

IB TOK Exhibition AI Grader Tool

1
Select grading rubric and level
2
Select coursework progress
3
Configure submission settings
4
Upload your coursework
5
Select report type
6
Confirm your privacy settings

How the IB TOK Exhibition Grader Works and Frequently Asked Questions

Why Use Our Coursework Grader?

Comprehensive Feedback

Get annotated suggestions, strengths, and actionable feedback for your work.

Subject specific rubrics

View your feedback in the context of the subject rubric and broken down bycriteria strands.

Secure by design

All files are deleted within 48h. We do not train on your data.

Frequently Asked Questions

Join 350k+ Students Already Crushing Their Exams