Coursework banner

IB Social and Cultural Anthropology EE

Get instant AI-powered feedback on your IB Social and Cultural Anthropology EE coursework with detailed assessment based on official marking criteria

IB Social and Cultural Anthropology EE Assessment Guide

IB Social and Cultural Anthropology Extended Essay Grader

  1. Lots of students struggle to decode their Social and Cultural Anthropology Extended Essay grade and assessment.
  2. This is a free grading tool that breaks down the IB Social and Cultural Anthropology EE rubric into plain English, so you understand exactly where your 4,000-word anthropological research project stands across all five assessment criteria.
  3. The embedded grader makes self-evaluation faster and more accurate than manual rubric checking, so you're never left guessing.

Note

The grader works in two modes:

  • Draft Mode: Quick assessment of your work-in-progress. Input your current sections and get instant feedback on which criteria need more work before you finish writing.
  • Full Mode: Complete evaluation of your finished EE. Input your final project details across all criteria and get a comprehensive grade breakdown with specific improvement suggestions for each section.

Quick Start Checklist

  1. Before using the grader, ensure you have these key elements ready:
    1. Research Question - Clear, focused anthropological question that allows for ethnographic investigation and cultural analysis
    2. Anthropological Focus - Must be firmly based on anthropological theory covering social organization, cultural practices, or human societies
    3. Ethnographic Sources - Mix of ethnographic studies, anthropological literature, field reports, and cultural documentation
    4. Anthropological Analysis - Extended critical evaluation of cultural evidence with theoretical application and comparative analysis
    5. Word Count Verification - Maximum 4,000 words (excluding bibliography, footnotes, and appendices)
    6. Complete Structure - Introduction, Investigation, Analysis, Conclusion, Bibliography, and Reflections
    7. Supervisor Meetings - Evidence of 3 mandatory reflection sessions with your EE supervisor
    8. Ethical Considerations - Discussion of anthropological ethics and cultural sensitivity where relevant

Rubric Breakdown

The Social and Cultural Anthropology EE is assessed based on five criteria, totaling 34 marks.

Criterion A: Focus and Method (6 marks)

  1. This criterion tests how clear and focused your anthropological research question is.
  2. It evaluates whether your methodology is appropriate for anthropological investigation.
Mark BandWhat It MeansEvidence You Must Show
0No clear focus or methodResearch question unclear or not anthropology-related
1-2Limited focus and methodBasic research question with minimal methodology explanation
3-4Adequate focus and methodClear anthropology-related question with appropriate research methodology
5-6Excellent focus and methodSharply focused anthropological question with sophisticated research approach maintained throughout

Criterion B: Knowledge and Understanding (6 marks)

  1. This evaluates your grasp of anthropological concepts and theoretical knowledge.
  2. It tests how well you apply anthropological theory and demonstrate cultural understanding.
Mark BandWhat It MeansEvidence You Must Show
0No relevant knowledgeNo connection to anthropological theory or concepts
1-2Limited knowledgeBasic understanding with minimal anthropological application
3-4Good knowledgeClear understanding with appropriate anthropological terminology and concepts
5-6Excellent knowledgeSophisticated understanding with expert use of anthropological concepts and theoretical frameworks

Criterion C: Critical Thinking (12 marks)

  1. This is the most important criterion - worth 35% of your total grade.
  2. It assesses your ability to analyze ethnographic data, evaluate anthropological arguments, and synthesize cultural findings.
Mark BandWhat It MeansEvidence You Must Show
0No critical thinkingPurely descriptive, no anthropological analysis
1-3Limited critical thinkingSome analysis but mainly descriptive
4-6Adequate critical thinkingClear analysis with some anthropological evaluation
7-9Good critical thinkingStrong analysis and evaluation of ethnographic evidence
10-12Excellent critical thinkingSophisticated analysis with original anthropological insights and comparative evaluation

Criterion D: Presentation (4 marks)

  1. This assesses professional presentation and academic formatting.
  2. It includes structure, anthropological communication, and adherence to academic conventions.
Mark BandWhat It MeansEvidence You Must Show
0Poor presentationUnclear structure, poor formatting, missing citations
1-2Adequate presentationGenerally clear with some formatting issues
3-4Excellent presentationProfessional structure, clear anthropological communication, proper citations

Criterion E: Engagement (6 marks)

  1. This tests your personal engagement with the anthropological research process.
  2. It's based on your reflection sessions and demonstrates your intellectual development.
Mark BandWhat It MeansEvidence You Must Show
0No engagementMinimal reflection, no evidence of personal involvement
1-2Limited engagementBasic reflection with some personal connection
3-4Good engagementClear reflection showing anthropological thinking development
5-6Excellent engagementSophisticated reflection demonstrating deep anthropological research engagement

How to Interpret Your Grade from the Tool

  1. The embedded grader calculates your total score out of 28 marks across all criteria except E, your reflections.
  2. Here's how to interpret your results:
    1. 24-28 marks (Grade A territory): Excellent work with sophisticated anthropological research. Minor refinements needed.
    2. 19-23 marks (Grade B range): Strong project with good cultural analysis. Focus on critical evaluation and theoretical synthesis.
    3. 14-18 marks (Grade C level): Competent work meeting basic requirements. Strengthen anthropological analysis and evidence evaluation.
    4. 9-13 mark marks (Grade D range): Adequate foundation but needs significant improvement. Review research focus and anthropological understanding.
    5. Below 9 marks (Grade E): Major revision required across most criteria. Restructure approach and strengthen anthropological fundamentals.

Tip

If you're between bands, focus on Criterion C (Critical Thinking) - it offers the biggest impact for improvement.

Grade Boundaries & Converting Your Mark

IB Extended Essay grade boundaries are consistent across subjects but can vary slightly by session:
IB GradeMark Range (out of 34)PercentageDescription
A27-3479-100%Excellent
B21-2662-76%Good
C14-2041-59%Satisfactory
D7-1321-38%Mediocre
E0-60-18%Elementary

Tip

  • Grades D or E in your EE mean you cannot receive the IB Diploma, regardless of other grades
  • Your EE grade combines with TOK to contribute up to 3 bonus points to your total IB score.

Subject-Specific Tips

Social Organization Focus:

  1. Investigate kinship systems, political structures, social stratification, or group dynamics.
  2. Include kinship theory, political anthropology, social structure analysis, and power relations.

Cultural Practices Focus:

  1. Examine ritual practices, belief systems, symbolic culture, or cultural transmission.
  2. Use symbolic anthropology, ritual theory, cognitive anthropology, and cultural interpretation.

Economic Anthropology Focus:

  1. Study exchange systems, economic practices, subsistence strategies, or market integration.
  2. Include economic theory, gift economy, reciprocity, and capitalist penetration.

Medical Anthropology Focus:

  1. Investigate health beliefs, healing practices, illness narratives, or medical pluralism.
  2. Use medical anthropology theory, embodiment, structural violence, and health disparities.

Urban Anthropology Focus:

  1. Analyze urban communities, migration patterns, city life, or urban-rural connections.
  2. Include urban theory, migration studies, spatial anthropology, and globalization.

Environmental Anthropology Focus:

  1. Study human-environment relations, ecological knowledge, resource management, or climate adaptation.
  2. Use ecological anthropology, political ecology, traditional knowledge systems, and environmental justice.

Research Process Guide

Planning Phase:

  1. Research question developmentLiterature identificationTheoretical framework selectionMethodological planning

Research Phase:

  1. Ethnographic literature reviewTheoretical synthesisComparative analysisCultural interpretation

Writing Phase:

  1. Argument structureEvidence integrationTheoretical applicationCritical evaluation

Reflection Phase:

  1. Research process evaluationCultural learning insightsMethodological reflectionEthical considerations

Anthropological Approaches Integration

  1. Cultural Anthropology: Symbolic systems → Cultural meanings → Interpretive analysis → Thick description
  2. Social Anthropology: Social structures → Group dynamics → Institutional analysis → Power relations
  3. Applied Anthropology: Practical applications → Policy implications → Development issues → Social change
  4. Theoretical Anthropology: Conceptual frameworks → Comparative analysis → Cross-cultural patterns → Human universals

Ethnographic Analysis Framework

  1. Descriptive Level: Cultural practices → Social behaviors → Environmental context → Historical background
  2. Interpretive Level: Symbolic meanings → Cultural logic → Indigenous perspectives → Emic understanding
  3. Theoretical Level: Anthropological concepts → Cross-cultural comparison → Theoretical synthesis → Academic contribution

Common Mistake

And fast fixes:

  • Too broad research question → Focus on specific cultural groups with clear geographical and temporal boundaries
  • Insufficient ethnographic evidence → Use substantial ethnographic studies and anthropological literature
  • Weak theoretical framework → Include comprehensive anthropological theories from multiple subdisciplines
  • Limited cultural analysis → Move beyond description to interpretation, comparison, and theoretical application
  • Poor comparative approach → Include cross-cultural comparisons or diachronic analysis where appropriate
  • Missing reflexivity → Address researcher positionality and methodological considerations
  • Inadequate cultural sensitivity → Demonstrate awareness of ethical issues and cultural representation
  • Word count violations → Stay within 4,000 words; only first 4,000 words are marked
  • Generic conclusions → Base conclusions on specific ethnographic evidence and theoretical analysis
  • Poor academic referencing → Use consistent citation style and credible anthropological sources

FAQs

  1. Can I conduct fieldwork for my Anthropology EE?
    1. Generally not required - focus on ethnographic literature analysis and theoretical synthesis.
  2. How current should my anthropological sources be?
    1. Balance recent ethnographies (within 5-10 years) with classic anthropological works and foundational theories.
  3. Should my EE connect to coursework topics?
    1. Can connect but ensure substantial extension beyond classroom material with original analysis.
  4. What level of theoretical sophistication is expected?
    1. Include multiple anthropological theories with sophisticated application to ethnographic evidence.
  5. How important are ethnographic details?
    1. Very important - include rich ethnographic description to support theoretical arguments.
  6. Can I focus on contemporary issues?
    1. Absolutely - modern anthropological problems provide excellent research opportunities.
  7. Should I include historical context?
    1. Where relevant - historical anthropology and diachronic analysis strengthen cultural understanding.
  8. How detailed should my cultural analysis be?
    1. Provide deep cultural interpretation with theoretical frameworks rather than surface description.
  9. Can I use visual anthropology?
    1. Yes - photographs, films, and visual culture can support ethnographic analysis.
  10. What makes an Anthropology EE exceptional?
    1. Sophisticated theoretical integration, comprehensive ethnographic analysis, cultural sensitivity, comparative approach, and original insights.

Use the Free Social and Cultural Anthropology Extended Essay Grader Now

  1. Stop guessing about your grade.
  2. The comprehensive grading tool evaluates your EE against all five official criteria, giving instant feedback on strengths and improvement areas.
  3. Input your project details and get a preliminary grade calculation that helps you focus revision efforts where they matter most.
  4. Anthropology-specific analysis helps you master the ethnographic interpretation and theoretical integration that separate excellent from average Social and Cultural Anthropology Extended Essays.

IB Social and Cultural Anthropology EE AI Grader Tool

1
Select grading rubric and level
2
Select coursework progress
3
Configure submission settings
4
Upload your coursework
5
Select report type
6
Confirm your privacy settings

How the IB Social and Cultural Anthropology EE Grader Works and Frequently Asked Questions

Why Use Our Coursework Grader?

Comprehensive Feedback

Get annotated suggestions, strengths, and actionable feedback for your work.

Subject specific rubrics

View your feedback in the context of the subject rubric and broken down bycriteria strands.

Secure by design

All files are deleted within 48h. We do not train on your data.

Frequently Asked Questions

Join 350k+ Students Already Crushing Their Exams