English A Individual Oral Grader
This page provides a comprehensive guide to the IB English A Individual Oral (IO) assessment, including a detailed breakdown of the rubric criteria and guidance on interpreting your grades. An embedded grading tool is available to help you self-assess your performance efficiently.
Quick Start Checklist
Before using the grading tool, ensure you have the following:
- Selected Extracts: Two extracts—one from a literary work and one from a non-literary body of work—that connect to a common global issue.
- Global Issue Identification: A clearly defined global issue that links both extracts.
- Annotated Texts: Notes highlighting key literary and stylistic features relevant to your analysis.
- Structured Outline: A bullet-point outline of your oral presentation, limited to 10 points.
- Practice Recordings: Recorded practice sessions to evaluate timing and delivery.
Rubric Breakdown (Paraphrased & Plain English)
The IO is assessed across four criteria, each worth up to 10 marks, totaling 40 marks.
Criterion A: Knowledge, Understanding, and Interpretation (10 marks)
What it tests: Your grasp of the extracts and their respective works, and how well you relate them to the global issue.
High Performance: Demonstrates thorough understanding with insightful interpretations directly tied to the global issue, supported by well-chosen references.
Common Mistakes: Superficial analysis or failing to connect the texts to the global issue.
| Mark Band | What It Means | Evidence You Must Show |
|---|---|---|
| 9–10 | Excellent understanding and persuasive interpretation of texts and global issue. | Well-chosen references effectively supporting your ideas. |
| 7–8 | Good understanding with sustained interpretation. | Relevant references supporting your ideas. |
| 5–6 | Satisfactory understanding with adequate interpretation. | Generally relevant references mostly supporting your ideas. |
| 3–4 | Some understanding with partial interpretation. | At times appropriate references. |
| 1–2 | Little understanding with minimal interpretation. | Infrequent or rarely appropriate references. |
| 0 | Does not meet the standard described above. |
Criterion B: Analysis and Evaluation (10 marks)
What it tests: Your ability to analyze and evaluate how authorial choices in the texts present the global issue.
High Performance: Insightful analysis with a nuanced understanding of authorial choices and their impact on the global issue.
Common Mistakes: Descriptive responses lacking critical analysis of authorial choices.
| Mark Band | What It Means | Evidence You Must Show |
|---|---|---|
| 9–10 | Insightful analysis and thorough understanding of authorial choices. | Clear evaluation of how these choices present the global issue. |
| 7–8 | Relevant and at times insightful analysis. | Good understanding of authorial choices in relation to the global issue. |
| 5–6 | Mostly relevant analysis with reasonable understanding. | Identification and reasonable understanding of authorial choices. |
| 3–4 | Some relevant analysis, reliant on description. | Vague treatment or partial understanding of authorial choices. |
| 1–2 | Descriptive with little relevant analysis. | Poor understanding of authorial choices. |
| 0 | Does not meet the standard described above. |
Criterion C: Focus and Organization (10 marks)
What it tests: The structure, balance, and focus of your oral presentation.
High Performance: Clear and sustained focus with logical and convincing development of ideas.
Common Mistakes: Lack of focus or coherence, leading to an unbalanced presentation.
| Mark Band | What It Means | Evidence You Must Show |
|---|---|---|
| 9–10 | Clear and sustained focus; well-balanced treatment of texts. | Logical and convincing development of ideas connected in a cogent manner. |
| 7–8 | Mostly clear and sustained focus; balanced treatment. | Logical development of ideas connected cohesively. |
| 5–6 | Focus maintained despite some lapses; mostly balanced treatment. | Mostly logical development of ideas connected cohesively. |
| 3–4 | Sometimes focused; treatment may be unbalanced. | Some connections between ideas, not always coherent. |
| 1–2 | Rarely focused; few connections between ideas. | |
| 0 | Does not meet the standard described above. |
Criterion D: Language (10 marks)
What it tests: Clarity, accuracy, and effectiveness of your language use.
High Performance: Clear, accurate, and varied language enhancing the oral presentation.
Common Mistakes: Frequent errors hindering communication; inappropriate style.
| Mark Band | What It Means | Evidence You Must Show |
|---|---|---|
| 9–10 | Clear, accurate, and varied language; occasional errors do not hinder communication. | Vocabulary and syntax create effect; appropriate style enhancing the oral. |
| 7–8 | Clear and accurate language; occasional errors do not hinder communication. | Appropriate and varied vocabulary and syntax; style somewhat enhances the oral. |
| 5–6 | Clear language; errors do not hinder communication. | Appropriate but simple and repetitive vocabulary and syntax; style neither enhances nor detracts. |
| 3–4 | Generally clear language; errors sometimes hinder communication. | Often imprecise vocabulary and syntax; style often inappropriate, detracting from the oral. |
| 1–2 | Rarely clear or accurate language; errors often hinder communication. | Imprecise and frequently inaccurate vocabulary and syntax; inappropriate style detracting from the oral. |
| 0 | Does not meet the standard described above. |
How to Interpret Your Grade from the Tool
The embedded grading tool provides a mark out of 40, which corresponds to the IB grade boundaries. If your score falls between bands, focus on the criteria where you scored lower and implement targeted improvements.
Improvement Actions by Criterion
- Criterion A: Deepen your understanding of the texts and strengthen connections to the global issue.
- Criterion B: Enhance your analysis of authorial choices and their impact on the global issue.
- Criterion C: Refine the structure and coherence of your presentation.
- Criterion D: Improve language clarity, accuracy, and appropriateness.
Annotated Examples
High-Band Excerpt: "The author employs juxtaposition to highlight the disparity between..."
Why It Scores High: Demonstrates insightful analysis of authorial choice and its effect on the global issue.
Mid/Low-Band Excerpt: "The author talks about differences between..."
What's Missing: Lacks specific analysis of how the author's choices convey the global issue.
Grade Boundaries & Converting Your Mark
Grade boundaries can vary by session. Refer to the latest IB documentation or consult your teacher for the most current boundaries.
Common Mistakes & Fast Fixes
- Mistake: Superficial analysis.
- Fix: Delve deeper into authorial choices and their implications.
- Mistake: Unstructured presentation.
- Fix: Create a clear outline and practice for coherence.
- Mistake: Inappropriate language register.
- Fix: Use formal, academic language suitable for analysis.
Subject-Specific Tips
- Literary Texts: Focus on themes, character development, and stylistic devices.
- Non-Literary Texts: Analyze visual elements, structure, and rhetorical devices.
- Global Issue: Ensure it's clearly defined and relevant to both texts.
FAQs
- How long should my presentation be?
- 10 minutes, followed by a 5-minute discussion.
- Can I use notes during the oral?
- Yes, a 10-point bullet outline is permitted.
- How do I choose a global issue?
- Select an issue that is significant, transnational, and connects both texts.
- What if I exceed the time limit?
- Practice to ensure you stay within the allotted time; exceeding may affect your score.
- Can I choose any texts?
- Texts must be from the IB prescribed list and studied during the course.
How is the IO recorded?
