Increasing concern for energy security is probable to lead to more sustainable energy choices.
Evaluate the validity of this statement, using named references.
Understanding Concepts and Terminology
- Energy security:
1 mark - Renewable/non-renewable energy sources:
1 mark - Renewable: solar, biomass, hydropower, wind, wave, tidal, geothermal
- Non-renewable: fossil fuels, nuclear
- Sustainability
1 mark - Emissions
1 mark
Breadth in Addressing and Linking
- Link different countries' issues of energy security with their energy choices
1 mark - Link energy choices to relative sustainability of renewable/non-renewable sources
1 mark
Examples
- Examples of renewable/non-renewable energy sources
1 mark - Examples of countries' energy choices
1 mark - Examples of issues of energy security
1 mark - Examples of impacts of exploiting energy resources
1 mark
Balanced Analysis
- Analyze whether energy choices driven by concern for energy security are more or less sustainable
2 marks - Acknowledge relevant counter-arguments/alternative viewpoints
1 mark
Conclusion
- Conclusion consistent with and supported by analysis and examples
2 marks -
Example: Although more sustainable renewable energy choices usually provide energy security, in some countries, due to local availability of non-renewable sources, the concern for security has been met by less sustainable sources (e.g., US exploitation of tar sands).
Candidates' conclusions do not have to agree with the example. 9 marks in total
-
Outline four different ways the value of named resources have changed over time.
Award
- Cultural influence, e.g., rising environmental awareness led to value of straw as building material:
1 mark - Social influence, e.g., animal rights leading to devaluing of animal furs in fashion:
1 mark - Economic influence, e.g., increased investment in industrial processes led to higher value of fossil fuels:
1 mark - Technological influences, e.g., progress in nuclear technology led to higher value of uranium:
1 mark - Political influences, e.g., increasing concern for energy security in US has led to devaluing of oil/increased value of tar sands:
1 mark - Ecological influences, e.g., greater understanding of ecosystems/ecology has led to high value attached to biodiversity:
1 mark
Renewable resources are not always sustainable due to the activities involved in their production.
Justify this statement for a named source of renewable energy.
eg hydropower:
- Hydropower is renewable because the water flow is replenished by the water cycle
- Building the dam will inhibit migration of fish reducing their populations
- Involve the flooding/destruction of terrestrial ecosystems
- Cause sedimentation that will lead to more flooding upstream
- Involve use of non-renewable building materials
- Construction/maintenance involves heavy use of fossil fuels/GHG production
- Reduced downstream flow threatening riverine populations/species
- (Reduced downstream flow threatening) associated terrestrial systems dependent on water flow eg floodplains/wetlands
- Building of access roads/growth of recreational activity may lead to damage of terrestrial/riparian systems
- May increase water loss/scarcity through increased evaporation rates
- Impacts of dam may reduce sustainability of local populations through eg reduced fishing/breeding ground for parasites/loss of agricultural land
eg solar energy:
- Solar energy is renewable because of continuous input/insolation
- Energy for panel construction/extraction of silicon involves use of fossil fuels/GHG production
- Production utilizes plastics derived from (non-renewable) fossil fuels
- Manufacture results in plastic waste that is non-biodegradable
- Require metals/elements that are non-renewable resources
- (Metals/elements) extracted through mining that damages habitats/ecosystems
- Manufacture involves use/production of many industrial toxins/hazardous waste
- Manufacture/operation requires considerable water supply (for cooling etc)
- Transport of materials for manufacture/installation impacts environment
- Limited life span/decommissioning will lead to further waste
- Solar farms can take up/displace large areas of natural ecosystems