Question
HLPaper 1
1.[15]
Using real-world examples, discuss whether an oligopolistic firm should collude rather than compete.
Verified
Solution
Answers may include:
Definitions
- Oligopoly: A market structure dominated by a few large firms.
- Collusion: An agreement between firms in an oligopoly to set prices or output to maximize joint profits.
Economic Theory
- Interdependence:
- Firms in an oligopoly are interdependent, meaning the actions of one firm affect the others.
- This interdependence can lead to strategic behavior, such as collusion or competition.
- Collusion:
- Collusion can take the form of formal agreements (cartels) or tacit understandings.
- By colluding, firms can act as a monopoly, setting higher prices and restricting output to maximize joint profits.
- Collusion can lead to higher prices for consumers and reduced consumer surplus.
- Competition:
- Competing firms may engage in price wars, leading to lower prices and potentially lower profits.
- Non-price competition (e.g., advertising, product differentiation) can also occur, increasing costs but potentially increasing market share.
- Game Theory:
- The Prisoner's Dilemma illustrates the tension between collusion and competition.
- While collusion maximizes joint profits, the incentive to cheat can lead to competitive outcomes.
- Diagram:
- No diagram required
Evaluation (SLAP)
- Stakeholders:
- Consumers: May face higher prices and less choice under collusion, but benefit from lower prices and more innovation under competition.
- Firms: Collusion can lead to higher profits, but the risk of legal penalties and the temptation to cheat can undermine stability.
- Government: May intervene to prevent collusion through antitrust laws, promoting competition to protect consumer welfare.
- Long-run vs. Short-run:
- In the short run, collusion can lead to higher profits and stability for firms.
- In the long run, the risk of detection and legal penalties can make collusion unsustainable.
- Competitive strategies may lead to innovation and efficiency gains over time.
- Advantages vs. Disadvantages:
- Collusion: Advantages include higher profits and market stability; disadvantages include legal risks and potential for consumer harm.
- Competition: Advantages include consumer benefits and innovation; disadvantages include potential for destructive price wars.
- Prioritize:
- Firms must weigh the benefits of higher short-term profits from collusion against the long-term benefits of competition, such as innovation and market growth.
- Real-world example: The OPEC cartel, which has historically colluded to control oil prices, but faces challenges from non-member countries and alternative energy sources.
Conclusion
- Collusion can offer short-term benefits for firms but poses significant legal and ethical risks.
- Competition, while potentially reducing short-term profits, can drive innovation and consumer benefits in the long run.
- The decision to collude or compete depends on market conditions, legal environment, and firm objectives.
2.[10]
Explain why costs tend to be relatively rigid in oligopolistic markets.
Verified
Solution
Answers may include:
Definitions
- Oligopoly: A market structure dominated by a few large firms.
- Price Rigidity: A situation where prices remain constant despite changes in demand or cost conditions.
Diagram
- No diagram required
Explanation
-
Interdependence and Strategic Behavior:
- In an oligopoly, firms are interdependent; each firm considers the potential reactions of rivals when making pricing decisions.
- This interdependence leads to strategic behavior, where firms are reluctant to change prices due to the uncertainty of competitors' responses.
-
Kinked Demand Curve Model:
- The kinked demand curve illustrates price rigidity. The curve is kinked at the prevailing market price.
- If a firm raises its price, competitors are unlikely to follow, leading to a loss of market share. This is represented by the more elastic upper segment of the demand curve.
- If a firm lowers its price, competitors are likely to match the price cut to maintain market share, leading to a less elastic lower segment.
- The result is a stable price, as firms have little incentive to change prices due to the asymmetric response of competitors.
-
Marginal Revenue and Cost Implications:
- The MR curve has a discontinuity at the kink, meaning that small changes in marginal cost do not affect the profit-maximizing price and output.
- This discontinuity contributes to price rigidity, as firms will maintain prices even if costs change slightly.
-
Barriers to Entry and Non-Price Competition:
- High barriers to entry in oligopolistic markets reduce the threat of new entrants, allowing existing firms to maintain stable prices.
- Firms often engage in non-price competition (e.g., advertising, product differentiation) rather than price competition, further contributing to price rigidity.
-
Additional Explanation:
- Complex Point: In some oligopolistic markets, firms may engage in tacit collusion, where they implicitly agree to maintain stable prices to maximize joint profits without explicit communication. This behavior reinforces price rigidity.