Writing a Strong IB History IA Analysis
The analysis section of the IB History Internal Assessment is where you demonstrate historical thinking at its highest level. This section moves beyond describing events and instead evaluates evidence, weighs interpretations, and constructs a reasoned argument that directly answers the research question.
A strong analysis shows that you can work like a historian: questioning sources, recognizing bias, and explaining significance.
Why the Analysis Section Matters
The analysis is not a summary of what happened. It is an evaluation of why events unfolded as they did and how historians and sources interpret them. Examiners are looking for critical engagement with evidence, not narrative detail.
A high-quality analysis:
- Evaluates the value and limitations of sources
- Engages with multiple perspectives
- Links all evidence directly to the research question
Establishing Context and Significance
Begin the analysis by briefly situating the investigation in its historical context. This should be concise and focused, providing only the background needed to understand the issue under investigation.
You should also clarify why the research question is historically significant. This may involve:
- Explaining a controversy or debate
- Highlighting a turning point or unresolved issue
- Showing why historians continue to disagree on the topic
This framing helps justify the relevance of your investigation.
Using a Range of Credible Sources
A strong analysis draws on both primary and secondary sources.
Primary sources may include speeches, letters, official documents, or contemporary accounts. Secondary sources include works by historians and scholars who interpret the past.
