RevisionDojoWriting a Strong IB History IA Analysis
The analysis section of your IB History Internal Assessment (IA) is where you demonstrate your ability to think like a historian. This is your chance to critically evaluate evidence, assess multiple interpretations, and build a well-supported argument that answers your research question. Let’s break down the key best practices that will help you write a strong, high-scoring History IA analysis.
Introduction: Why the Analysis Section Matters in History IA
Your IA analysis isn’t just a summary of sources — it’s your opportunity to show critical thinking, depth of understanding, and mastery of historical inquiry. A well-crafted analysis will examine the value and limitations of sources, engage with differing viewpoints, and link evidence directly to your research question.
Best Practice 1: Start With a Clear Introduction to Context and Significance
Explaining historical background
Begin your analysis with a brief overview of the historical context. This sets the stage for readers and helps frame the importance of your investigation.
Outlining significance or controversy
Explain why your research question matters. Is it tied to a controversial event, an unresolved debate, or a significant turning point in history?
Best Practice 2: Use Diverse and Credible Sources
Combining primary and secondary sources
A strong IA analysis incorporates both primary sources (e.g., speeches, letters, official documents) and secondary sources (e.g., works by historians). Aim for at least 8–10 sources for depth and variety.
Ensuring source reliability and academic credibility
Select sources with clear authorship and purpose. Prioritize materials from academic books, journals, and trusted archives over general web sources.
Best Practice 3: Critically Analyze and Evaluate Key Sources
Discussing origin, purpose, content, and context
For at least two key sources, discuss:
- Who created the source, and when?
- What was its purpose?
- What does the content reveal?
- How does its historical context affect its value?
Assessing value and limitations of sources
Highlight what makes the source useful for your investigation and where its weaknesses lie. Consider bias, perspective, and reliability.
Best Practice 4: Structure Your Analysis Logically
Thematic vs chronological organization
Choose the structure that best suits your topic:
- Thematic: Organize by key themes or arguments.
- Chronological: Follow the sequence of events or developments.
Using clear paragraphs or subheadings
Each paragraph should focus on one idea, argument, or perspective, making your analysis easy to follow.
Best Practice 5: Present Multiple Viewpoints Thoughtfully
Comparing interpretations and arguments
Show that you’ve engaged with differing historical interpretations. Compare how historians or sources view the issue differently.
Highlighting historiographical debates
If relevant, reference debates within the field and position your investigation within that discussion.
Best Practice 6: Support Arguments With Specific Evidence
Using direct references and quotations
Cite specific facts, figures, or quotations to back up your points. This strengthens your argument and shows precision.
Linking evidence to your research question
Ensure every piece of evidence directly addresses your research question rather than straying into general narrative.
Best Practice 7: Maintain Focus on the Research Question
Avoiding unnecessary description or narrative
Your IA isn’t a story — avoid lengthy descriptions of events and stay focused on analysis.
Ensuring all content addresses the question directly
Every paragraph should contribute to answering your research question.
Best Practice 8: Write Concisely and Clearly
Using formal academic language
Write in a formal tone with accurate grammar, spelling, and punctuation.
Achieving clarity and logical flow
Ensure your ideas connect smoothly and logically from one to the next.
Best Practice 9: Conclude Effectively With a Focused Summary
Identifying the most convincing interpretation
End your analysis by stating which viewpoint you find most persuasive and why.
Justifying your conclusion based on analysis
Support your conclusion with clear reasoning drawn from your source evaluation and evidence.
Best Practice 10: Use Accurate Referencing and Citation
Applying IB-preferred citation style
Follow a recognized academic style (e.g., Chicago, MLA) consistently throughout your IA.
Avoiding plagiarism and enhancing credibility
Proper citation shows academic honesty and strengthens the authority of your work.
FAQs on Writing a Strong IB History IA Analysis
1️⃣ How long should the analysis section of my History IA be?
The recommended length is about 500 words — focused, clear, and analytical.
2️⃣ How many sources should I include in my analysis?
Aim for at least 8–10 credible sources, with in-depth evaluation of two key sources.
3️⃣ Should I include both primary and secondary sources?
Yes! A mix of primary and secondary sources adds depth and demonstrates thorough research.
4️⃣ How do I ensure my analysis stays focused?
Constantly link your points back to your research question and avoid unnecessary narrative.
5️⃣ What’s the best way to organize my analysis?
Thematically or chronologically — choose the structure that best fits your investigation.
6️⃣ How important is referencing in the IA?
Essential! Proper citation avoids plagiarism and meets IB academic integrity standards.
Conclusion: Build a High-Scoring IB History IA Analysis
Writing a strong IB History IA analysis requires critical thinking, clear organization, and precise use of evidence. By following these best practices — from evaluating sources to comparing viewpoints — you can produce an analysis that meets IB standards for depth, insight, and academic rigor.
