Practice 4.2 Types of Trade Protection with authentic IB Economics exam questions for both SL and HL students. This question bank mirrors Paper 1, 2, 3 structure, covering key topics like microeconomics, macroeconomics, and international trade. Get instant solutions, detailed explanations, and build exam confidence with questions in the style of IB examiners.
Albania is a country in Southeastern Europe with an estimated population of about 2.8 million in 2022. The Albanian economy has been transitioning from a centrally planned system to a market-based system and has experienced positive real GDP growth in recent years. Tourism is a significant contributor to Albania’s GDP, and the government has intensified efforts to promote the country’s attractions along its Adriatic and Ionian coasts.
In 2022, Albania’s unemployment rate was around 12%, partly due to structural challenges in the economy. The government operates a progressive personal income tax system, with rates ranging from 0% up to 23%. Corporate income tax is set at 15%. Value-added tax (VAT) on most goods and services stands at 20%.
Albania’s trade balance remains negative, as the country’s main exports (textiles, footwear, and mineral fuels) have not kept pace with imports (machinery, food, and manufactured goods). The government has embarked on several infrastructural projects to attract foreign investment and reduce transport costs, including a newly announced US$200 million investment in highways. Economists estimate the marginal propensity to consume (MPC) in Albania to be about 0.8.
Table 1: Selected Macroeconomic Indicators for Albania
| Year | Real GDP (billion US$) | Unemployment Rate (%) | Gini Coefficient |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 15.2 | 11.5 | 0.30 |
| 2022 | 16.0 | 12.0 | 0.31 |
Table 2: Tourism Data in Albania (2022)
| Price per Tour Package (EUR) | Quantity Demanded of Tour Packages (thousands) |
|---|---|
| 400 | 140 |
| 450 | 120 |
Using the information provided in Table 1, calculate the percentage change in Albania’s real GDP between 2021 and 2022.
The Albanian government’s US$200 million highway project is expected to raise national income through the Keynesian multiplier, assuming the marginal propensity to consume (MPC) is 0.8. Calculate the total increase in national income that could result from this project.
Using the data in Table 2, calculate the price elasticity of demand (PED) for Albania’s tour packages when the price increases from EUR 400 to EUR 450.
Using the data in Table 1, calculate the absolute change in the unemployment rate between 2021 and 2022.
Define the term “progressive tax.”
Using an AD/AS diagram, explain how an increase in government spending on infrastructure could affect real GDP in Albania.
Using information from Table 1, calculate the approximate percentage change in Albania's Gini coefficient between 2021 and 2022. Show your working.
Using information from the text, explain how a persistent trade deficit might impact Albania’s economic growth.
Using the text/data provided and your knowledge of economics, recommend a policy which the government of Albania could implement in order to reduce unemployment.
Guatemala is a Central American country with an estimated population of 17.9 million (2022). According to World Bank data, real GDP was approximately US$85 billion in 2022. Agriculture, particularly coffee, sugar, and bananas, makes up a significant portion of Guatemala’s exports (around 28% of total exports). While the tourism sector has been expanding, recent global events caused slowdowns. The country experiences persistent inequality, with a Gini coefficient estimated at about 0.48 in 2021. Poverty remains a major concern, especially in rural areas.
Guatemala’s tax system includes both direct and indirect taxes, although collection remains challenging. Personal income tax rates are progressive, with a top rate of 31%, while the corporate income tax rate is 25%. A value-added tax (VAT) of 12% applies to most goods. Government spending has focused on infrastructure and social programs to reduce poverty and increase potential long-term growth.
Table 1: Macroeconomic Indicators of Guatemala (2019–2022)
| Year | Real GDP (US$ bn) | Nominal GDP (US$ bn) | Exports of Goods & Services (US$ bn) | Government Spending (US$ bn) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 76.0 | 78.2 | 11.5 | 11.8 |
| 2020 | 73.5 | 75.0 | 10.2 | 12.1 |
| 2021 | 78.4 | 81.0 | 12.4 | 12.3 |
| 2022 | 85.0 | 88.0 | 13.5 | 13.2 |
Table 2: Income Distribution in Guatemala (2021)
| Quintile | Income share |
|---|---|
| 1 (lowest 20%) | 4.1% |
| 2 | 9.0% |
| 3 | 15.0% |
| 4 | 24.0% |
| 5 (highest 20%) | 47.9% |
Table 3: Market for Guatemalan Coffee in the US (price per 50 kg bag)
| Price per 50 kg bag | Quantity Demanded (tons) | Quantity Supplied (tons) |
|---|---|---|
| $110 | 900 | 550 |
| $120 | 850 | 600 |
| $130 | 800 | 650 |
| $140 | 750 | 700 |
| $150 | 700 | 740 |
Table 4: Tax Rates in Guatemala
| Type of tax | Rate of tax |
|---|---|
| Corporate income tax | 25% |
| Personal income tax | Progressive up to 31% |
| Value Added Tax (VAT) | 12% on most goods; some items taxed at 0% |
Figure 1 (not drawn here) shows that, when government spending in Guatemala increases by US$1 billion, real GDP rises by an estimated US$2.5 billion. This suggests a government spending multiplier of 2.5.
Using the information in Table 1, calculate the real GDP growth rate from 2021 to 2022.
Using Figure 1, the government spending rises by US$1 billion, yet real GDP rises by US$2.5 billion. Calculate the government spending multiplier and explain the main step used in your calculation.
Using the information in Table 3, calculate the price elasticity of demand (PED) for Guatemalan coffee when the price rises from US$120 to US$130 per 50 kg bag.
Using the information in Table 3, calculate the price elasticity of supply (PES) for Guatemalan coffee when the price increases from US$140 to US$150 per 50 kg bag.
Define the term “progressive tax.”
Using an AD/AS diagram, explain how an increase in government spending might increase real GDP and reduce unemployment in Guatemala.
Using the data in Table 3, calculate the approximate equilibrium price for Guatemalan coffee. Show your working.
Using information from Table 2, explain two ways in which high income inequality might hamper economic development in Guatemala.
Using the text/data provided and knowledge of economics, recommend a policy that the government of Guatemala could implement to reduce income inequality. Justify the recommendation.
Explain how import quotas can affect a market previously operating under free trade.
Estonia is a small Baltic nation of approximately 1.3 million people and a member of the European Union (EU). Its economy is characterized by a highly developed digital infrastructure, a strong commitment to innovation, and comparatively low public debt. The country has seen notable growth in service sectors such as tourism and information technology (IT). Estonia is also known for its relatively low level of corruption and ease of doing business.
In recent years, Estonia’s GDP growth has fluctuated. Between 2018 and 2019, real GDP grew steadily due to robust exports of IT services and growth in inbound tourism. However, the global economic slowdown in 2020 led to lower tourism revenues, affecting the country’s overall economic performance. Income inequality has been an area of focus for policymakers, given Estonia’s Gini coefficient has been moderate but slowly increasing. The government maintains several forms of taxation (including VAT, personal income tax, and corporate taxation), each contributing differently to government revenue.
Tourism is an important source of income, especially from visitors from Finland, Russia, and other EU countries. Average spending per tourist has tended to rise, but so have accommodation and transportation costs. The price elasticity of demand for inbound tourism is not negligible, as changes in travel costs and exchange rates influence tourist flows.
Estonia’s taxation system includes a flat personal income tax rate of 20%, although there are discussions about introducing progressive elements. VAT rates vary depending on the product category. Meanwhile, the government has contemplated expansionary fiscal measures to offset slower growth periods. Policymakers also debate the efficacy of supply-side policies (such as reducing labor taxes and encouraging business start-ups) to maintain Estonia’s competitiveness in the global digital economy.
Table 1: Selected Macroeconomic Indicators for Estonia (2018–2021)
| Indicator | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Real GDP (billion euros) | 26.0 | 27.2 | 26.5 | 29.0 |
| Real GDP Growth Rate (%) | 4.5 | 4.3 | -2.9 | 8.2 |
| Unemployment Rate (%) | 5.4 | 4.4 | 6.8 | 6.0 |
| Gini Coefficient | 0.31 | 0.32 | 0.33 | 0.34 |
Table 2: Estimated Demand for Inbound Tourism (annual)
| Average Price per Trip (euros) | Quantity of Trips Demanded (thousands) |
|---|---|
| 300 | 325 |
| 330 | 280 |
Table 3: Government Tax Data (2021)
| Type of Tax | Rate | Annual Revenue (million euros) |
|---|---|---|
| Personal Income Tax | 20% (flat) | 1,880 |
| Corporate Tax | 20% on distributed profit | 800 |
| Value-Added Tax (VAT) | Standard rate: 20% | 2,200 |
Table 4: Consumption and Multiplier Data (2021)
| Aggregate Income (Y) (billion euros) | Marginal Propensity to Consume (MPC) |
|---|---|
| 28.0 | 0.75 |
Using information from Table 2, calculate the price elasticity of demand for inbound tourism in Estonia when the average price per trip increases from €300 to €330.
Using the data in Table 1, calculate Estonia’s average annual real GDP growth rate over the period 2018 to 2021. Show all your working.
Using information from Table 1, calculate the percentage change in the Gini coefficient from 2018 to 2021.
Using Table 4, calculate the Keynesian (simple) multiplier for Estonia.
Define the term “progressive tax.”
Using an AD/AS diagram, explain how a significant increase in Estonia’s IT services exports might affect real GDP and the price level in the short run.
Using the data from Table 3, calculate what percentage of Estonia's total tax revenue comes from personal income tax. Show your working.
Using information from the text and Table 1, explain two ways in which Estonia’s rising income inequality could affect its long-term economic development.
Using the text/data provided and your knowledge of economics, recommend a policy that the Estonian government could implement to maintain strong economic growth while addressing rising income inequality.
Denmark is a highly developed economy in Northern Europe with a population of about 5.9 million. It boasts one of the highest standards of living in the world, supported by a broad-based welfare system and progressive taxation. The service sector, advanced manufacturing, and renewable-energy technology form key parts of its economy. Denmark’s central bank has maintained low interest rates, helping to foster economic stability. However, challenges such as ensuring long-term sustainability of the welfare system and addressing potential future energy shortfalls remain.
Exports are crucial for Denmark’s economic success, with wind turbines, pharmaceuticals, and meat products contributing significantly to export revenues. Wind turbine manufacturers in Denmark have become global leaders, but recent shifts in global demand and competition from Asian producers have tested the capacity of local firms. Meanwhile, a high rate of personal and corporate income tax has provided funds for extensive public expenditure, including education, healthcare, and infrastructure.
Table 1: Selected Macroeconomic Indicators for Denmark (2022–2023)
| Indicator | 2022 | 2023 (est.) |
|---|---|---|
| Nominal GDP (billion DKK) | 2,350 | 2,485 |
| Real GDP growth rate (%) | 2.1 | 3.0 |
| Inflation rate (%) | 5.5 | 2.8 |
| Unemployment rate (%) | 4.5 | 4.2 |
| Government spending (billion DKK) | 860 | 920 |
| Marginal propensity to consume (MPC) | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Gini coefficient (after taxes/transfers) | 0.27 | 0.26 |
Table 2: Market for Wind Turbines Produced in Denmark
| Price per turbine (DKK) | Quantity Demanded (units per year) | Quantity Supplied (units per year) |
|---|---|---|
| 10,000,000 | 100 | 60 |
| 11,000,000 | 90 | 65 |
| 12,000,000 | 84 | 68 |
| 15,000,000 | 75 | 72 |
Table 3: Income Distribution in Denmark (2022)
| Income Group | Income Range (DKK/year) | Proportion of Households (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest 20 % | 0 – 240,000 | 20 |
| Second 20 % | 240,001 – 400,000 | 20 |
| Third 20 % | 400,001 – 600,000 | 20 |
| Fourth 20 % | 600,001 – 850,000 | 20 |
| Highest 20 % | Above 850,000 | 20 |
Table 4: Overview of Tax Rates in Denmark
| Tax Category | Rate (% of taxable income / value) |
|---|---|
| Corporate income tax | 22 |
| Top personal income tax | 52 |
| Standard VAT rate | 25 |
| Reduced VAT rate | 15 |
In 2023, an energy-infrastructure firm in Denmark is planning a major investment worth 1.2 billion DKK, and claims it could significantly boost the economy by generating additional consumption expenditures.
Wind Turbine Exports
Denmark exported 70 units of wind turbines at an average price of 11,000,000 DKK per unit to other European countries in 2022. Owing to rising demand for renewable energy worldwide, the price of wind turbines exported from Denmark is expected to rise from 11,000,000 DKK to 12,000,000 DKK per unit in 2023. However, global competition from producers in Asia might cause changes in the quantity demanded.
Using information from Table 1, calculate the real GDP growth (in billion DKK) from 2022 to 2023 for Denmark.
Based on Table 2, estimate the price elasticity of supply (PES) for wind turbines in Denmark when the price increases from 11,000,000 DKK to 12,000,000 DKK per turbine.
Using information from the text, calculate the change in the total value of Denmark’s wind turbine exports when the price rises from 11,000,000 DKK to 12,000,000 DKK per unit, assuming the quantity exported remains constant at 70 units.
Using the data from Table 3, calculate what proportion of total households earn above 400,000 DKK per year. [
Define the term “Keynesian multiplier.”
Using an aggregate demand and aggregate supply (AD/AS) diagram, explain how the planned 1.2 billion DKK infrastructure investment by the energy-infrastructure firm could affect real output and the price level in Denmark.
Using information from Table 4, calculate the corporate income tax that would be paid by a Danish company with taxable profits of 50 million DKK. Show your working.
Using information from the text and Table 4, explain one way in which Denmark’s progressive tax system (top personal tax rate of 52 %) may help reduce income inequality.
Using the text/data provided and knowledge of economics, recommend a policy that the government of Denmark could implement to increase its long-term economic growth, while ensuring external competitiveness.
Fiji is an archipelago located in the South Pacific, known for its thriving tourism industry and longstanding sugar sector. Tourism directly and indirectly accounts for nearly 38% of Fiji’s gross domestic product (GDP), making it one of the country’s main sources of foreign exchange. The island nation receives over 800 000 international visitors in a normal (non-pandemic) year, with most tourists arriving from Australia and New Zealand. However, dependence on tourism also makes Fiji vulnerable to external shocks such as global economic downturns or natural disasters.
The sugar industry is the second-largest contributor to Fiji’s export earnings, employing workers in growing, harvesting, and processing sugarcane. Due to changing weather patterns and competition from other sugar-producing nations, sugar production in Fiji faces challenges in expanding supply. In an effort to diversify government revenue, Fiji applies a 9% value added tax (VAT) on domestic sugar sales.
In 2022, the Fijian government announced a 200 million FJD infrastructure investment program aimed at improving rural roads, upgrading port facilities, and modernizing sugar processing plants. Economists estimate Fiji’s marginal propensity to consume (MPC) at 0.75, suggesting a potentially significant boost to aggregate demand if the infrastructure spending is effectively implemented.
Table 1: Key Macroeconomic Indicators for Fiji (2019–2020)
| Indicator | 2019 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| Real GDP (FJD millions) | 11 500 | 11 845 |
| Population (thousands) | 889 | 895 |
| Inflation rate (%) | 1.5 | 1.0 |
| Gini coefficient | 0.37 | 0.36 |
Table 2: Sugar Market Data in Fiji
| Year | Price (FJD/ton) | Quantity Demanded (million tons) | Quantity Supplied (million tons) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 800 | 1.20 | 1.05 |
| 2022 | 840 | 1.10 | 1.04 |
Additional Information
• Fiji’s VAT on sugar is 9%.
• The government’s total planned infrastructure investment in 2022 is 200 million FJD.
• Economists estimate Fiji’s MPC = 0.75.
• Corporate tax rate is 20%.
• Personal income tax is a progressive system up to 20%.
Using information from Table 2, calculate the price elasticity of demand (PED) for sugar in Fiji when the price increases from 800 FJD per ton in 2021 to 840 FJD per ton in 2022.
Using information from the text above, calculate the total change in real GDP resulting from the government’s 200 million FJD infrastructure investment, given the marginal propensity to consume (MPC) of 0.75.
Using information from Table 1, calculate the real GDP growth rate for Fiji from 2019 to 2020.
Using information from Table 2 and the text above, calculate the total indirect tax (VAT) revenue from sugar sales in 2022.
Define the term “Keynesian multiplier.”
Explain why Fiji’s sugar producers might have a relatively price-inelastic supply in the short run.
Using information from Table 1, calculate the percentage change in Fiji's real GDP per capita between 2019 and 2020. Show your working.
Using data from Table 1, explain how a reduction in the Gini coefficient might benefit Fiji’s long-term economic growth.
Using the text/data provided and knowledge of economics, recommend a policy which could be implemented by the government of Fiji in order to reduce the country’s vulnerability to external shocks arising from tourism and sugar exports.
Estonia is a small, high-income European country with a population of around 1.33 million. The Estonian economy is highly open, with exports accounting for a large share of its GDP. In 2021, Estonia’s real GDP was approximately €34.5 billion, growing by 8.0%, while the 2022 figure rose to €36.4 billion, with real GDP growth of 3.5%. Over the same period, the unemployment rate declined from 6.2% to 5.6%.
Estonia is known for its advanced digital infrastructure, which has attracted investment in technology and services. However, inflation surged in 2022 due to global supply pressures and increased energy prices. Estonia has a relatively low level of income inequality compared to many countries, as measured by its Gini coefficient, which improved slightly from 0.31 in 2021 to around 0.30 in 2022.
Estonia’s tax system is characterized by a flat personal income tax rate of 20% and a 20% corporate tax on distributed profits. The government also raises revenue through value-added tax (VAT) at 20%, excise duties, and social security contributions of 33%. The timber industry plays a significant role in Estonian exports; higher prices for timber have contributed to fluctuations in export earnings.
Below are three tables presenting selected data for the Estonian economy:
Table 1: Selected Macroeconomic Indicators for Estonia (2021–2022)
| Indicator | 2021 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Real GDP (EUR billions) | 34.5 | 36.4 |
| Real GDP growth rate (%) | 8.0 | 3.5 |
| Unemployment rate (%) | 6.2 | 5.6 |
| Inflation (%) | 4.5 | 18.8 |
| Gini coefficient (estimate) | 0.31 | 0.30 |
Table 2: Timber Market Data in Estonia
| Price (EUR/m³) | Quantity Demanded (million m³) |
|---|---|
| 120 | 2.6 |
| 140 | 2.3 |
Table 3: Tax Revenue in Estonia (2022)
| Tax Type | Rate (%) | Annual Revenue (EUR million) |
|---|---|---|
| Personal income tax | 20 | 2,000 |
| Corporate tax (on distributed profits) | 20 | 800 |
| VAT | 20 | 3,200 |
| Excise taxes (alcohol, tobacco, fuel) | Varies | 1,500 |
| Social security contributions | 33 | 4,100 |
| Total tax revenue | - | 11,600 |
Using the data in Table 2, calculate the price elasticity of demand (PED) for timber in Estonia when the price increases from €120 per cubic meter to €140 per cubic meter.
Using the data in Table 1, calculate the approximate nominal percentage increase in Estonia’s GDP from 2021 to 2022. Show your working.
Referring to Table 3, calculate the share of personal income tax revenue as a percentage of Estonia’s total tax revenue in 2022.
Using the information in Table 3, calculate the additional revenue the government would gain if the personal income tax rate rose from 20% to 22%, assuming the tax base remains unchanged.
Define the term “Keynesian multiplier.”
Using an AD/AS diagram, explain how an increase in government spending might affect real GDP in Estonia.
Using the data from Table 3, calculate what percentage of Estonia's total tax revenue comes from VAT. Show your working.
Using information from the text and Table 1, explain two ways in which Estonia’s rising inflation rate might affect income inequality.
Using the text/data provided and your knowledge of economics, recommend a policy which the Estonian government could introduce to address the high rate of inflation. Justify your recommendation.
Greenland, an autonomous territory of Denmark, is the world’s largest island with a population of about 56000 people. The economy relies heavily on fisheries (accounting for more than 90% of Greenland’s total exports), public sector services financed through grants from Denmark, and (increasingly) tourism. Recent explorations suggest that Greenland has untapped reserves of minerals and rare earth elements. However, high infrastructure costs and environmental considerations pose challenges to diversification.
Real GDP growth has been volatile due to changes in global demand for fish products and fluctuations in fish prices, while the population faces income inequality concerns. Recent debates in Greenland’s Parliament (Inatsisartut) focus on reforms to taxation and public spending, seeking to foster inclusive economic growth and reduce income disparities.
Table 1: Key Macroeconomic Indicators of Greenland (2018–2021)
| Indicator | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nominal GDP (bn DKK) | 15.8 | 16.5 | 16.3 | 17.0 |
| Real GDP growth (%) | 2.4 | 3.0 | -1.2 | 2.1 |
| Unemployment rate (%) | 6.2 | 5.5 | 7.1 | 6.4 |
| Gini coefficient | 0.32 | 0.34 | 0.35 | 0.35 |
| Government budget balance (% of GDP) | -2.2 | -1.5 | -4.0 | -3.0 |
Table 2: Fish Exports Data (2019–2021)
| Year | Fish exports (tonnes) | Average price per tonne (DKK) | Estimated PED for Greenlandic halibut |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 25 000 | 25 000 | -0.8 |
| 2020 | 24 000 | 27 500 | -0.7 |
| 2021 | 27 000 | 28 000 | -0.6 |
Table 3: Income Distribution and Taxation(2021)
| Income group | Share of total population (%) | Average annual income (DKK) | Tax rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low-income | 25 | 140 000 | 35 |
| Middle-income | 50 | 250 000 | 40 |
| High-income | 25 | 600 000 | 45 |
Figure 1: Simplified market for Greenlandic Halibut (2021)
Prices are measured in DKK per tonne. Demand (D) and supply (S) represent domestic demand and supply. Pw1 is the initial world price of 28 000 DKK per tonne, while Pw2 is a possible world price of 30 000 DKK per tonne.
Using information from Table 1, calculate Greenland’s approximate nominal GDP per capita for 2021, given that the population was 56 000. Show your workings.
Based on Table 1, calculate Greenland’s average annual real GDP growth rate over the period 2018–2021 (use simple arithmetic mean of the four rates, treating the negative number for 2020 as part of the calculation). Show your workings.
Using the data from Table 2 for 2020 and 2021, calculate the percentage change in total export revenue (in DKK) from Greenlandic halibut.
Refer to Figure 1. Assume the price for Greenlandic halibut rises from Pw1 = 28 000 DKK per tonne to Pw2 = 30 000 DKK per tonne. Using the PED value of -0.6 for 2021, calculate the approximate percentage change in quantity demanded for Greenlandic halibut.
Define the term “progressive tax.”
Using a Keynesian multiplier diagram (AD/AS with an upward sloping AS), explain how an increase in government spending (funded partly by Danish block grants) could affect Greenland’s real GDP in the short run.
Using Table 3, calculate the total income tax paid by the low-income group in Greenland in 2021. Assume the group consists of 25% of the 56 000 population and that everyone earns the average income stated. Show your workings.
Using information from the text and Tables 1 and 3, explain two reasons why persistent inequality (as indicated by the Gini coefficient and tax data) could be harmful to Greenland’s long-term economic growth.
Using the text/data provided and your knowledge of economics, recommend a policy which could be implemented by Greenland’s Parliament in order to reduce income inequality and support long-term economic growth. Justify your recommendation.
Denmark, a small open economy in Northern Europe, consistently ranks among the countries with the highest standards of living. It has a strong welfare system, relatively low levels of income inequality, and high tax rates. Denmark’s main exports include pharmaceuticals, machinery, and dairy products, with exports accounting for approximately 55% of its gross domestic product (GDP). In 2022, total exports were DKK 1.3 trillion and total imports were DKK 1.2 trillion, reflecting Denmark’s significant degree of integration into global trade.
The Danish government asserts a high commitment to green growth. In 2022, it announced a planned DKK 40 billion increase in infrastructure spending for renewable energy projects over the next three years, aiming to reduce carbon emissions and create new jobs.
Table 1: Selected Macroeconomic Indicators for Denmark (2018–2022)
| Indicator | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Real GDP (DKK, trillions) | 2.25 | 2.30 | 2.28 | 2.38 | 2.45 |
| Annual Real GDP Growth (%) | 2.2 | 2.3 | -0.9 | 4.4 | 3.0 |
| Unemployment Rate (%) | 4.9 | 4.6 | 5.2 | 4.7 | 4.4 |
| Inflation Rate (%) | 1.0 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 1.8 | 3.0 |
| Gini Coefficient | 0.28 | 0.28 | 0.27 | 0.28 | 0.28 |
| Population (millions) | 5.8 | 5.8 | 5.8 | 5.83 | 5.84 |
Denmark’s relatively high tax revenue (as a percentage of GDP) partly stems from its progressive income tax system, a 22% corporate tax rate, and a 25% value-added tax (VAT) on most goods and services. The government hopes that increased spending, alongside its ongoing tax structure, will maintain stable growth and promote economic equity.
Table 2: Price and Quantity Data for Danish Cheese (per kg)
| Price (DKK) | Quantity Demanded (tons/week) | Quantity Supplied (tons/week) |
|---|---|---|
| 45 | 3 000 | 2 500 |
| 50 | 2 400 | 2 850 |
The table above shows hypothetical weekly market data for Danish cheese at two different price levels. Denmark’s dairy sector is important for its economy, representing a significant portion of agricultural output and exports.
Despite its strong export performance, Denmark faces challenges typical of advanced economies, such as maintaining competitiveness, addressing demographic changes, and balancing environmental aims with fiscal considerations.
Using information from Table 1, calculate Denmark’s approximate real GDP growth in DKK (in trillions) between 2018 and 2022.
In 2022, the Danish government committed DKK 40 billion to green infrastructure investments. Assuming a Keynesian multiplier of 1.5, calculate the total potential increase in real GDP that could result from this policy.
Using information from Table 2, calculate the price elasticity of demand (PED) for Danish cheese when the price increases from DKK 45/kg to DKK 50/kg.
Using information from Table 2, calculate the price elasticity of supply (PES) for Danish cheese when the price increases from DKK 45/kg to DKK 50/kg.
Define the term “progressive tax.”
Using an AD/AS diagram, explain how an increase in government spending on green infrastructure might affect real GDP and the average price level in Denmark.
Using information from Table 1, calculate Denmark's real GDP per capita in 2022. Show your working.
Using information from the case study above, explain two ways in which Denmark’s participation in international trade could support its economic growth.
Using the text/data provided and knowledge of economics, recommend a policy which the Danish government could implement to address one major economic challenge identified in the case study. Justify the recommendation.
Northland Free Trade Agreement
Northland is a landlocked developing country of 5 million people. Despite agriculture employing 60% of the labor force, the sector contributes only 25% to GDP, highlighting significant productivity challenges. The country's trade profile reflects this economic structure, with exports concentrated in primary products like coffee, tea, and textiles, while relying heavily on imports of machinery, oil, and processed foods, resulting in a persistent annual trade deficit of $1 billion.
In response to growing concerns about import dependency and the need to protect domestic industries, Northland's government initially implemented substantial tariffs on processed food imports. This protection policy aimed to nurture local food processing capabilities and reduce the trade deficit. However, while these measures provided some shelter for domestic producers, they also resulted in higher consumer prices and limited market competition.
Recently, Northland has taken a significant step by signing a free trade agreement (FTA) with a neighboring country, marking a shift from protectionist policies toward regional integration. This move presents both opportunities and challenges: while it promises improved market access for Northland's exports and potential technology transfer through increased regional trade, it also exposes local producers to stronger competition. However, to maintain domestic standards of living in face of fear of machinery replacing jobs, the Northland's government has imposed a minimum wage. The success of these policy shifts will largely depend on how well Northland's agricultural sector can adapt to new market pressures while leveraging its traditional export strengths.
Table 1: Northland's Trade Data Before and After FTA
| Year | Exports (US$ billion) | Imports (US$ billion) | Trade Deficit (US$ billion) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2.5 | 3.5 | 1.0 |
| 2023 | 3.2 | 3.8 | 0.6 |
Table 2: Price Elasticities of Demand for Northland’s Key Exports and Imports
| Product | PED | PES |
|---|---|---|
| Coffee | -0.6 | 0.4 |
| Tea | -0.8 | 0.6 |
| Textiles | -1.2 | 1.0 |
| Machinery (imported) | -0.3 | 0.2 |
| Processed food (imported) | -0.9 | 0.7 |
Define the term free trade.
List two types of trade barriers that governments can impose.
Using information from Table 1, calculate the percentage change in Northland’s trade deficit from 2021 to 2023.
Draw a diagram to show the effect of a tariff on processed food imports before the FTA.
Using a tariff diagram, explain how the removal of tariffs on processed food might affect consumption in Northland.
Using a comparative advantage diagram, explain how the FTA could improve Northland’s export competitiveness.
Using a free trade diagram, explain how increased imports could impact Northland’s domestic food processing industry.
Using a labour market diagram, explain how the imposition of a minimum wage might lead to structural unemployment in Northland’s agricultural sector.
Using information from the text/data and your knowledge of economics, evaluate the potential impact of price elasticities on Northland’s trade balance.