Practice 4.1 Benefits of International Trade with authentic IB Economics exam questions for both SL and HL students. This question bank mirrors Paper 1, 2, 3 structure, covering key topics like microeconomics, macroeconomics, and international trade. Get instant solutions, detailed explanations, and build exam confidence with questions in the style of IB examiners.
Explain how a country's producers can achieve greater revenue by exporting goods under free trade.
Iran, officially the Islamic Republic of Iran, is located in Western Asia. It has the second-largest natural gas supply and the fourth-largest proven oil reserves in the world. The economy is heavily reliant on oil exports, which are a major source of government revenue. Although Iran has some diversified sectors, persistent inflation, currency fluctuations, and international sanctions have impacted economic performance.
In recent years, Iran has experienced fluctuating real GDP growth rates. The government collects tax revenue through a progressive personal income tax system as well as a flat corporate tax rate. A value added tax (VAT) applies to most goods and services.
Table 1: Real GDP of Iran (2019–2022, approximate figures)
| Year | Real GDP (billions of US$) |
|---|---|
| 2019 | 470 |
| 2020 | 450 |
| 2021 | 465 |
| 2022 | 480 |
Table 2: Saffron Market Data in Iran (annual production and demand, approximate figures)
| Price per kg (US$) | Quantity Demanded (kg) | Quantity Supplied (kg) |
|---|---|---|
| 900 | 55 000 | 40 000 |
| 1000 | 50 000 | 50 000 |
Table 3: Selected Tax Rates in Iran
| Type of Tax | Rate |
|---|---|
| Corporate Income Tax | 20% (flat) |
| Personal Income Tax | 15% – 25% (progressive) |
| VAT (most goods/services) | 9% |
Additional information:
Using information from Table 1, calculate the approximate real GDP growth rate from 2021 to 2022. Show your working.
Assuming the marginal propensity to consume (MPC) is 0.75, calculate the Keynesian multiplier for Iran’s proposed US$2 billion infrastructure spending.
Using information from Table 2, calculate the price elasticity of demand (PED) for saffron when the price increases from USD900 per kg to USD1000 per kg.
Using information from Table 3, calculate the amount of VAT a consumer would pay on a saffron purchase of US$200 (before tax).
Define the term “progressive tax.”
Using an AD/AS diagram, explain how an increase in government spending (such as the proposed US$2 billion infrastructure program) could affect Iran’s real GDP in the short run.
Using Table 2, calculate the excess supply or excess demand of saffron in Iran at the price of US$1000 per kg.
Using information from the text, explain two ways in which income inequality (Gini coefficient of 0.42) might act as a barrier to long-term economic development in Iran.
Using the text/data provided and your knowledge of economics, recommend a policy which could be implemented by the government of Iran in order to promote economic stability and growth.
Fiji is an archipelago located in the South Pacific, known for its thriving tourism industry and longstanding sugar sector. Tourism directly and indirectly accounts for nearly 38% of Fiji’s gross domestic product (GDP), making it one of the country’s main sources of foreign exchange. The island nation receives over 800 000 international visitors in a normal (non-pandemic) year, with most tourists arriving from Australia and New Zealand. However, dependence on tourism also makes Fiji vulnerable to external shocks such as global economic downturns or natural disasters.
The sugar industry is the second-largest contributor to Fiji’s export earnings, employing workers in growing, harvesting, and processing sugarcane. Due to changing weather patterns and competition from other sugar-producing nations, sugar production in Fiji faces challenges in expanding supply. In an effort to diversify government revenue, Fiji applies a 9% value added tax (VAT) on domestic sugar sales.
In 2022, the Fijian government announced a 200 million FJD infrastructure investment program aimed at improving rural roads, upgrading port facilities, and modernizing sugar processing plants. Economists estimate Fiji’s marginal propensity to consume (MPC) at 0.75, suggesting a potentially significant boost to aggregate demand if the infrastructure spending is effectively implemented.
Table 1: Key Macroeconomic Indicators for Fiji (2019–2020)
| Indicator | 2019 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| Real GDP (FJD millions) | 11 500 | 11 845 |
| Population (thousands) | 889 | 895 |
| Inflation rate (%) | 1.5 | 1.0 |
| Gini coefficient | 0.37 | 0.36 |
Table 2: Sugar Market Data in Fiji
| Year | Price (FJD/ton) | Quantity Demanded (million tons) | Quantity Supplied (million tons) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 800 | 1.20 | 1.05 |
| 2022 | 840 | 1.10 | 1.04 |
Additional Information
• Fiji’s VAT on sugar is 9%.
• The government’s total planned infrastructure investment in 2022 is 200 million FJD.
• Economists estimate Fiji’s MPC = 0.75.
• Corporate tax rate is 20%.
• Personal income tax is a progressive system up to 20%.
Using information from Table 2, calculate the price elasticity of demand (PED) for sugar in Fiji when the price increases from 800 FJD per ton in 2021 to 840 FJD per ton in 2022.
Using information from the text above, calculate the total change in real GDP resulting from the government’s 200 million FJD infrastructure investment, given the marginal propensity to consume (MPC) of 0.75.
Using information from Table 1, calculate the real GDP growth rate for Fiji from 2019 to 2020.
Using information from Table 2 and the text above, calculate the total indirect tax (VAT) revenue from sugar sales in 2022.
Define the term “Keynesian multiplier.”
Explain why Fiji’s sugar producers might have a relatively price-inelastic supply in the short run.
Using information from Table 1, calculate the percentage change in Fiji's real GDP per capita between 2019 and 2020. Show your working.
Using data from Table 1, explain how a reduction in the Gini coefficient might benefit Fiji’s long-term economic growth.
Using the text/data provided and knowledge of economics, recommend a policy which could be implemented by the government of Fiji in order to reduce the country’s vulnerability to external shocks arising from tourism and sugar exports.
Explain how international trade can reduce prices for domestic consumers.
Using real-world examples, evaluate the limits of the theory of comparative advantage.
Greenland, an autonomous territory of Denmark, is the world’s largest island with a population of about 56000 people. The economy relies heavily on fisheries (accounting for more than 90% of Greenland’s total exports), public sector services financed through grants from Denmark, and (increasingly) tourism. Recent explorations suggest that Greenland has untapped reserves of minerals and rare earth elements. However, high infrastructure costs and environmental considerations pose challenges to diversification.
Real GDP growth has been volatile due to changes in global demand for fish products and fluctuations in fish prices, while the population faces income inequality concerns. Recent debates in Greenland’s Parliament (Inatsisartut) focus on reforms to taxation and public spending, seeking to foster inclusive economic growth and reduce income disparities.
Table 1: Key Macroeconomic Indicators of Greenland (2018–2021)
| Indicator | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nominal GDP (bn DKK) | 15.8 | 16.5 | 16.3 | 17.0 |
| Real GDP growth (%) | 2.4 | 3.0 | -1.2 | 2.1 |
| Unemployment rate (%) | 6.2 | 5.5 | 7.1 | 6.4 |
| Gini coefficient | 0.32 | 0.34 | 0.35 | 0.35 |
| Government budget balance (% of GDP) | -2.2 | -1.5 | -4.0 | -3.0 |
Table 2: Fish Exports Data (2019–2021)
| Year | Fish exports (tonnes) | Average price per tonne (DKK) | Estimated PED for Greenlandic halibut |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 25 000 | 25 000 | -0.8 |
| 2020 | 24 000 | 27 500 | -0.7 |
| 2021 | 27 000 | 28 000 | -0.6 |
Table 3: Income Distribution and Taxation(2021)
| Income group | Share of total population (%) | Average annual income (DKK) | Tax rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low-income | 25 | 140 000 | 35 |
| Middle-income | 50 | 250 000 | 40 |
| High-income | 25 | 600 000 | 45 |
Figure 1: Simplified market for Greenlandic Halibut (2021)
Prices are measured in DKK per tonne. Demand (D) and supply (S) represent domestic demand and supply. Pw1 is the initial world price of 28 000 DKK per tonne, while Pw2 is a possible world price of 30 000 DKK per tonne.
Using information from Table 1, calculate Greenland’s approximate nominal GDP per capita for 2021, given that the population was 56 000. Show your workings.
Based on Table 1, calculate Greenland’s average annual real GDP growth rate over the period 2018–2021 (use simple arithmetic mean of the four rates, treating the negative number for 2020 as part of the calculation). Show your workings.
Using the data from Table 2 for 2020 and 2021, calculate the percentage change in total export revenue (in DKK) from Greenlandic halibut.
Refer to Figure 1. Assume the price for Greenlandic halibut rises from Pw1 = 28 000 DKK per tonne to Pw2 = 30 000 DKK per tonne. Using the PED value of -0.6 for 2021, calculate the approximate percentage change in quantity demanded for Greenlandic halibut.
Define the term “progressive tax.”
Using a Keynesian multiplier diagram (AD/AS with an upward sloping AS), explain how an increase in government spending (funded partly by Danish block grants) could affect Greenland’s real GDP in the short run.
Using Table 3, calculate the total income tax paid by the low-income group in Greenland in 2021. Assume the group consists of 25% of the 56 000 population and that everyone earns the average income stated. Show your workings.
Using information from the text and Tables 1 and 3, explain two reasons why persistent inequality (as indicated by the Gini coefficient and tax data) could be harmful to Greenland’s long-term economic growth.
Using the text/data provided and your knowledge of economics, recommend a policy which could be implemented by Greenland’s Parliament in order to reduce income inequality and support long-term economic growth. Justify your recommendation.
Overvaluation of the NZD
New Zealand’s strong economic performance has led to a surge in the value of its currency, the New Zealand dollar (NZD). The finance minister has expressed concern that the NZD is overvalued by 10–15%, potentially impacting the country’s export sector by making its goods and services more expensive for foreign buyers.
Despite the strong currency, New Zealand’s export sector has demonstrated resilience, adapting to the challenging environment. However, the Reserve Bank of New Zealand (RBNZ) has taken steps to curb inflationary pressures and maintain economic stability. The central bank has raised interest rates four times this year, reaching 3.5%. This tightening of monetary policy aims to keep inflation expectations in check and ensure sustainable economic expansion.
New Zealand’s economy is projected to grow at a robust 3.7% in 2014. The country has also achieved a trade surplus, driven by strong global demand for its dairy products. However, recent declines in dairy prices have moderated export growth, as New Zealand’s dairy exports are a key contributor to the economy.
To address the overvalued currency, the central bank may consider intervening in the foreign exchange market to induce a depreciation of the NZD. A weaker NZD would boost exports by making them more competitive internationally and reduce inflationary pressures caused by expensive imports. By carefully managing monetary policy, the Reserve Bank aims to strike a balance between supporting economic growth and maintaining price stability.
The NZD had been near its record high against the US dollar before weakening last week due to slower inflation figures and a fall in dairy prices. The NZD has gained about 6% so far this year.
An economist recently suggested that the central bank might intervene in the currency market to prevent further appreciation of the NZD.
New Zealand government figures showed a monthly trade (goods) surplus of NZD 247 million in June 2014, compared to NZD 371 million in June 2013. The annual trade (goods) balance shifted to a surplus of NZD 1.2 billion from a deficit of NZD 819 million a year earlier.
Global demand for New Zealand dairy products has been a key support for exports over the past 18 months, though prices have dropped this year due to an increase in global supply.
Table 1: New Zealand’s Trade Data
| Year | Exports (NZD billion) | Imports (NZD billion) | Trade Balance (NZD billion) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 48.2 | 49.0 | ? |
| 2014 | 50.5 | 49.3 | ? |
Table 2: NZD Exchange Rate and Dairy Price Index
| Year | NZD/USD Exchange Rate | Dairy Price Index (Base = 100) |
|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 0.78 | 120 |
| 2014 | 0.85 | 102 |
Define the term exchange rate.
List two possible reasons why a country might experience an overvalued currency.
Using information from Table 1, calculate the percentage change in New Zealand’s trade balance from 2013 to 2014.
Using a supply and demand diagram, draw the impact of a strong NZD on the demand for New Zealand’s exports.
Using an exchange rate diagram, explain how an intervention by the Reserve Bank to weaken the NZD could affect the exchange rate.
Using Table 2 and information from the text, explain how falling prices of dairy products affect the exchange rate of NZD
Using an interest rate diagram, explain how an increase in interest rates can help control inflation.
Using an AD-AS diagram, explain the possible impact of a trade surplus on New Zealand’s economic growth.
Using information from the text/data and your knowledge of economics, evaluate the effects of New Zealand’s overvalued currency on its economic growth and/or development.
Current account deficit poses a challenge to Pakistan’s economy
Pakistan’s president has raised concerns about the increasing current account deficit, which grew to USD 12.12 billion in 2016/17 from USD 4.86 billion in 2015/16. This deficit is driven by rising imports and declining exports. Due to low prices of the imported goods in foreign markets, the president has proposed restricting the import of luxury, non-essential goods through quotas, aiming to mitigate the issue and reduce dependence on external borrowing.
The governor of Pakistan’s central bank supports the president’s concern, emphasizing that excessive non-essential imports contribute to the deficit and require borrowing from abroad. However, he noted that 32% of imports consist of capital goods essential for the growth of small and medium enterprises (SMEs), agriculture, and construction.
Central bank advisors have suggested depreciating the rupee to address the trade deficit. The currency operates under a managed exchange rate system and is estimated to be overvalued by 20%. However, the central bank governor warns of the negative effects of depreciation, such as higher inflation.
Pakistan’s economic growth reached 5.3% in 2016, its highest in a decade, with an estimated increase to 6% in 2017. The government believes that boosting SME loans from 7-8% to 15-17% of total business loans will further enhance economic growth.
In addition to the current account deficit, fiscal policy decisions have led to a budget deficit, increasing public debt to 62% of GDP in 2016. The central bank recommends limiting public debt to 60% of GDP.
Table 1: Pakistan’s Current Account Data
| Year | Exports (US$ billion) | Imports (US$ billion) | Current Account Deficit (US$ billion) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015/16 | 22.0 | 26.86 | 4.86 |
| 2016/17 | 21.5 | 33.62 | 12.12 |
Table 2: Key Economic Indicators
| Year | GDP Growth Rate (%) | SME Loans (% of total business loans) | Public Debt (% of GDP) | Rupee Overvaluation (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 5.3 | 7.5 | 62 | 20 |
| 2017 | 6.0 | 8.0 | 65 | 18 |
Define the term "current account".
List two fiscal policy measures.
Using information from Table 1, calculate the percentage increase in Pakistan’s current account deficit from 2015/16 to 2016/17.
Draw a diagram to show the effect of a low price of foreign goods on the quantity imported by Pakistan.
Using an exchange rate diagram, explain how a depreciation of the rupee could impact Pakistan’s trade balance.
Using an AD/AS diagram, explain how an increase in government debt could affect economic growth.
Using a demand and supply diagram, explain how restricting luxury imports may affect domestic production in Pakistan.
Using information from the text/data and your knowledge of economics, evaluate Pakistan's current measures effectiveness in achieving long-run economic growth and/or development.
Northland Free Trade Agreement
Northland is a landlocked developing country of 5 million people. Despite agriculture employing 60% of the labor force, the sector contributes only 25% to GDP, highlighting significant productivity challenges. The country's trade profile reflects this economic structure, with exports concentrated in primary products like coffee, tea, and textiles, while relying heavily on imports of machinery, oil, and processed foods, resulting in a persistent annual trade deficit of $1 billion.
In response to growing concerns about import dependency and the need to protect domestic industries, Northland's government initially implemented substantial tariffs on processed food imports. This protection policy aimed to nurture local food processing capabilities and reduce the trade deficit. However, while these measures provided some shelter for domestic producers, they also resulted in higher consumer prices and limited market competition.
Recently, Northland has taken a significant step by signing a free trade agreement (FTA) with a neighboring country, marking a shift from protectionist policies toward regional integration. This move presents both opportunities and challenges: while it promises improved market access for Northland's exports and potential technology transfer through increased regional trade, it also exposes local producers to stronger competition. However, to maintain domestic standards of living in face of fear of machinery replacing jobs, the Northland's government has imposed a minimum wage. The success of these policy shifts will largely depend on how well Northland's agricultural sector can adapt to new market pressures while leveraging its traditional export strengths.
Table 1: Northland's Trade Data Before and After FTA
| Year | Exports (US$ billion) | Imports (US$ billion) | Trade Deficit (US$ billion) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2.5 | 3.5 | 1.0 |
| 2023 | 3.2 | 3.8 | 0.6 |
Table 2: Price Elasticities of Demand for Northland’s Key Exports and Imports
| Product | PED | PES |
|---|---|---|
| Coffee | -0.6 | 0.4 |
| Tea | -0.8 | 0.6 |
| Textiles | -1.2 | 1.0 |
| Machinery (imported) | -0.3 | 0.2 |
| Processed food (imported) | -0.9 | 0.7 |
Define the term free trade.
List two types of trade barriers that governments can impose.
Using information from Table 1, calculate the percentage change in Northland’s trade deficit from 2021 to 2023.
Draw a diagram to show the effect of a tariff on processed food imports before the FTA.
Using a tariff diagram, explain how the removal of tariffs on processed food might affect consumption in Northland.
Using a comparative advantage diagram, explain how the FTA could improve Northland’s export competitiveness.
Using a free trade diagram, explain how increased imports could impact Northland’s domestic food processing industry.
Using a labour market diagram, explain how the imposition of a minimum wage might lead to structural unemployment in Northland’s agricultural sector.
Using information from the text/data and your knowledge of economics, evaluate the potential impact of price elasticities on Northland’s trade balance.
Cuba is an island nation in the Caribbean with a long history of state-led economic policies and a continued trade embargo imposed by the United States since 1960. The Cuban economy is heavily dependent on two key sectors: sugar and tourism. Sugar has traditionally been Cuba’s largest export, accounting for over 70% of export revenues, although inefficiencies and outdated technology have constrained growth in output. Meanwhile, tourism has become an increasingly important source of foreign exchange, representing nearly 24% of the nation’s gross domestic product (GDP). However, environmental concerns have arisen from rapid growth in visitor arrivals, including water pollution and congestion in popular coastal areas.
Cuba’s real GDP grew modestly from 2021 to 2022, although high inflation and global supply chain disruptions presented serious challenges. The government has attempted some economic reforms, including allowing limited private enterprise and trying to attract modest amounts of foreign direct investment (FDI). Nevertheless, significant barriers to trade remain in place due to the decades-long embargo, as do restrictions on access to many imported goods.
The Cuban government operates a progressive tax system to finance public healthcare, education, and subsidized food programmes. Alongside this, it has announced a new subsidy plan to boost sugar production and modernize processing facilities. Policymakers hope that these measures will generate both export revenues and improved economic prospects.
Below are selected data from the Cuban economy:
Table 1: Key Macroeconomic Indicators for Cuba (2021–2022)
| Year | Real GDP (US$ billion) | Population (millions) | Inflation (%) | Government Injection (US$ million) | Marginal Propensity to Consume (MPC) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 54.0 | 11.28 | 12.5 | 500 | 0.80 |
| 2022 | 58.3 | 11.29 | 10.2 | 500 | 0.80 |
Table 2: Demand for Sugar in Cuba
| Price (US$ per tonne) | Quantity Demanded (tonnes) |
|---|---|
| 380 | 3 200 000 |
| 410 | 2 800 000 |
Table 3: Tourism in Cuba
| Year | Total Tourism Receipts (US$ billion) | Tourism as % of GDP | International Visitors (millions) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 3.5 | 22 | 2.1 |
| 2022 | 4.2 | 24 | 2.6 |
Table 4: Selected Cuban Tax Rates
| Type of Tax | Rate |
|---|---|
| Corporate Income Tax | 30% |
| Personal Income Tax (Progressive) | Top bracket 35% |
| Indirect Taxes (various categories) | 0%, 10%, or 15% |
Using the information provided in Table 1, calculate the real GDP growth rate of Cuba from 2021 to 2022.
The government injection in Table 1 is US$500 million. Assuming a Marginal Propensity to Consume (MPC) of 0.80, calculate the total change in real GDP resulting from this injection using the Keynesian multiplier formula
Using the information in Table 2, calculate the price elasticity of demand (PED) for sugar in Cuba when the price increases from US410 per tonne.
Using the information in Table 3, calculate the absolute change in tourism’s share of GDP from 2021 to 2022.
Define the term “trade embargo.”
Using an externalities diagram, explain how an increase in tourism in Cuba could result in negative externalities.
Using information from Table 1, calculate Cuba's real GDP per capita in 2022. Show your working.
Using information from the text, explain how Cuba’s reliance on sugar and tourism might increase its vulnerability in international trade.
Using the text/data provided and your knowledge of economics, recommend a policy which could be implemented by the Cuban government to reduce the negative impact of its dependence on sugar exports.
Explain how international trade can contribute to economies of scale.
Using real-world examples, evaluate administrative barriers as a form of trade protection.