Practice 2.6 Elasticity of supply with authentic IB Economics exam questions for both SL and HL students. This question bank mirrors Paper 1, 2, 3 structure, covering key topics like microeconomics, macroeconomics, and international trade. Get instant solutions, detailed explanations, and build exam confidence with questions in the style of IB examiners.
Explain how the amount of unused capacity in a firm affects its price elasticity of supply.
Explain how the rate at which costs increase with output affects the elasticity of supply.
Explain how the rate at which costs increase with output affects the elasticity of supply.
Poland is a country in Central Europe with a population of approximately 38 million. Its membership in the European Union (EU) has contributed to strong economic ties with other European nations. In recent years, Poland has experienced both robust economic growth and rising inflationary pressures. While unemployment remains low, concerns about income inequality have drawn the government’s attention.
Poland is also one of the largest producers of apples in the EU, exporting a significant portion of its harvest to other European countries, especially Germany. However, rising production costs and shifting demand conditions have affected both domestic producers and international consumers of Polish apples. Discussions surrounding potential government interventions include tax policy changes, labor market incentives, and expanded social welfare programs. The statistics below provide insights into macroeconomic performance, apple market dynamics, taxation, and household consumption behavior in Poland.
Table 1: Selected Macroeconomic Data for Poland
| Indicator | 2021 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Real GDP (billion PLN, at 2015 prices) | 2200 | 2310 |
| Inflation rate (CPI, %) | 5.1 | 14.3 |
| Unemployment rate (%) | 3.4 | 3.0 |
| Gini coefficient | 0.30 | 0.32 |
| Population (millions) | 38.1 | 38.2 |
| Estimated average Marginal Propensity to Consume (MPC) | 0.8 | 0.8 |
Table 2: Apple Market Data (Exports to Germany)
| Price per kilogram (euros) | Quantity Demanded (thousand metric tons) | Quantity Supplied (thousand metric tons) |
|---|---|---|
| 2.00 (in 2021) | 600 | 620 |
| 2.40 (in 2022) | 540 | 700 |
Table 3: Corporate Taxation in Poland (2022)
| Type of tax | Rate |
|---|---|
| Corporate Income Tax (CIT) | 19% |
| Personal Income Tax (progressive) | 17% up to certain threshold, 32% beyond |
| Furniture manufacturer’s net profit (million PLN) | 15 |
Using information from Table 1, calculate the approximate real GDP growth rate for Poland between 2021 and 2022.
The Polish government decides to increase its expenditure by 5 billion PLN. Assuming the Marginal Propensity to Consume (MPC) in Poland remains at 0.8, calculate the total potential change in real GDP that may result from this increase in government spending.
Using the data in Table 2, calculate the price elasticity of demand (PED) for Polish apples in Germany when the price increases from €2.00 to €2.40 per kilogram.
Using the data in Table 2, calculate the price elasticity of supply (PES) for Polish apples over the same price range.
Define the term “income inequality.”
Using an AD/AS diagram, explain one possible impact on Poland’s real GDP and price level if rising inflation continues to reduce households’ real incomes.
Using information from Table 3, calculate the corporate income tax that the furniture manufacturer would pay on its net profit in 2022. Show your working.
Using information from Table 1 and the text, explain how a rising Gini coefficient may affect long-term economic growth in Poland.
Using the text/data provided and your knowledge of economics, recommend one policy that the government of Poland could implement to address the challenges posed by both high inflation and rising income inequality. Justify your recommendation.
Denmark is a highly developed economy in Northern Europe with a population of about 5.9 million. It boasts one of the highest standards of living in the world, supported by a broad-based welfare system and progressive taxation. The service sector, advanced manufacturing, and renewable-energy technology form key parts of its economy. Denmark’s central bank has maintained low interest rates, helping to foster economic stability. However, challenges such as ensuring long-term sustainability of the welfare system and addressing potential future energy shortfalls remain.
Exports are crucial for Denmark’s economic success, with wind turbines, pharmaceuticals, and meat products contributing significantly to export revenues. Wind turbine manufacturers in Denmark have become global leaders, but recent shifts in global demand and competition from Asian producers have tested the capacity of local firms. Meanwhile, a high rate of personal and corporate income tax has provided funds for extensive public expenditure, including education, healthcare, and infrastructure.
Table 1: Selected Macroeconomic Indicators for Denmark (2022–2023)
| Indicator | 2022 | 2023 (est.) |
|---|---|---|
| Nominal GDP (billion DKK) | 2,350 | 2,485 |
| Real GDP growth rate (%) | 2.1 | 3.0 |
| Inflation rate (%) | 5.5 | 2.8 |
| Unemployment rate (%) | 4.5 | 4.2 |
| Government spending (billion DKK) | 860 | 920 |
| Marginal propensity to consume (MPC) | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Gini coefficient (after taxes/transfers) | 0.27 | 0.26 |
Table 2: Market for Wind Turbines Produced in Denmark
| Price per turbine (DKK) | Quantity Demanded (units per year) | Quantity Supplied (units per year) |
|---|---|---|
| 10,000,000 | 100 | 60 |
| 11,000,000 | 90 | 65 |
| 12,000,000 | 84 | 68 |
| 15,000,000 | 75 | 72 |
Table 3: Income Distribution in Denmark (2022)
| Income Group | Income Range (DKK/year) | Proportion of Households (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest 20 % | 0 – 240,000 | 20 |
| Second 20 % | 240,001 – 400,000 | 20 |
| Third 20 % | 400,001 – 600,000 | 20 |
| Fourth 20 % | 600,001 – 850,000 | 20 |
| Highest 20 % | Above 850,000 | 20 |
Table 4: Overview of Tax Rates in Denmark
| Tax Category | Rate (% of taxable income / value) |
|---|---|
| Corporate income tax | 22 |
| Top personal income tax | 52 |
| Standard VAT rate | 25 |
| Reduced VAT rate | 15 |
In 2023, an energy-infrastructure firm in Denmark is planning a major investment worth 1.2 billion DKK, and claims it could significantly boost the economy by generating additional consumption expenditures.
Wind Turbine Exports
Denmark exported 70 units of wind turbines at an average price of 11,000,000 DKK per unit to other European countries in 2022. Owing to rising demand for renewable energy worldwide, the price of wind turbines exported from Denmark is expected to rise from 11,000,000 DKK to 12,000,000 DKK per unit in 2023. However, global competition from producers in Asia might cause changes in the quantity demanded.
Using information from Table 1, calculate the real GDP growth (in billion DKK) from 2022 to 2023 for Denmark.
Based on Table 2, estimate the price elasticity of supply (PES) for wind turbines in Denmark when the price increases from 11,000,000 DKK to 12,000,000 DKK per turbine.
Using information from the text, calculate the change in the total value of Denmark’s wind turbine exports when the price rises from 11,000,000 DKK to 12,000,000 DKK per unit, assuming the quantity exported remains constant at 70 units.
Using the data from Table 3, calculate what proportion of total households earn above 400,000 DKK per year. [
Define the term “Keynesian multiplier.”
Using an aggregate demand and aggregate supply (AD/AS) diagram, explain how the planned 1.2 billion DKK infrastructure investment by the energy-infrastructure firm could affect real output and the price level in Denmark.
Using information from Table 4, calculate the corporate income tax that would be paid by a Danish company with taxable profits of 50 million DKK. Show your working.
Using information from the text and Table 4, explain one way in which Denmark’s progressive tax system (top personal tax rate of 52 %) may help reduce income inequality.
Using the text/data provided and knowledge of economics, recommend a policy that the government of Denmark could implement to increase its long-term economic growth, while ensuring external competitiveness.
Fiji is an archipelago located in the South Pacific, known for its thriving tourism industry and longstanding sugar sector. Tourism directly and indirectly accounts for nearly 38% of Fiji’s gross domestic product (GDP), making it one of the country’s main sources of foreign exchange. The island nation receives over 800 000 international visitors in a normal (non-pandemic) year, with most tourists arriving from Australia and New Zealand. However, dependence on tourism also makes Fiji vulnerable to external shocks such as global economic downturns or natural disasters.
The sugar industry is the second-largest contributor to Fiji’s export earnings, employing workers in growing, harvesting, and processing sugarcane. Due to changing weather patterns and competition from other sugar-producing nations, sugar production in Fiji faces challenges in expanding supply. In an effort to diversify government revenue, Fiji applies a 9% value added tax (VAT) on domestic sugar sales.
In 2022, the Fijian government announced a 200 million FJD infrastructure investment program aimed at improving rural roads, upgrading port facilities, and modernizing sugar processing plants. Economists estimate Fiji’s marginal propensity to consume (MPC) at 0.75, suggesting a potentially significant boost to aggregate demand if the infrastructure spending is effectively implemented.
Table 1: Key Macroeconomic Indicators for Fiji (2019–2020)
| Indicator | 2019 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| Real GDP (FJD millions) | 11 500 | 11 845 |
| Population (thousands) | 889 | 895 |
| Inflation rate (%) | 1.5 | 1.0 |
| Gini coefficient | 0.37 | 0.36 |
Table 2: Sugar Market Data in Fiji
| Year | Price (FJD/ton) | Quantity Demanded (million tons) | Quantity Supplied (million tons) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 800 | 1.20 | 1.05 |
| 2022 | 840 | 1.10 | 1.04 |
Additional Information
• Fiji’s VAT on sugar is 9%.
• The government’s total planned infrastructure investment in 2022 is 200 million FJD.
• Economists estimate Fiji’s MPC = 0.75.
• Corporate tax rate is 20%.
• Personal income tax is a progressive system up to 20%.
Using information from Table 2, calculate the price elasticity of demand (PED) for sugar in Fiji when the price increases from 800 FJD per ton in 2021 to 840 FJD per ton in 2022.
Using information from the text above, calculate the total change in real GDP resulting from the government’s 200 million FJD infrastructure investment, given the marginal propensity to consume (MPC) of 0.75.
Using information from Table 1, calculate the real GDP growth rate for Fiji from 2019 to 2020.
Using information from Table 2 and the text above, calculate the total indirect tax (VAT) revenue from sugar sales in 2022.
Define the term “Keynesian multiplier.”
Explain why Fiji’s sugar producers might have a relatively price-inelastic supply in the short run.
Using information from Table 1, calculate the percentage change in Fiji's real GDP per capita between 2019 and 2020. Show your working.
Using data from Table 1, explain how a reduction in the Gini coefficient might benefit Fiji’s long-term economic growth.
Using the text/data provided and knowledge of economics, recommend a policy which could be implemented by the government of Fiji in order to reduce the country’s vulnerability to external shocks arising from tourism and sugar exports.
Serbia is a country located in Southeastern Europe with a population of approximately 6.9 million. Its official currency is the Serbian dinar (RSD). According to official estimates, Serbia’s nominal GDP in 2022 reached US$65.2 billion, growing from US$63.5 billion in 2021. The unemployment rate stands at 9.8%, although it can be higher in rural areas. Inflation in 2022 averaged about 11.5%, driven partly by increasing energy prices.
Serbia is well-known for its agricultural output—especially raspberries, where it ranks among the top producers in the world. Domestically, the government charges a 20% value added tax (VAT) on many goods and services. The personal income tax system has a base rate of 10%, rising gradually for higher income brackets, while corporate income is taxed at 15%. The Gini coefficient stands at 0.35, suggesting moderate income inequality.
Trade is a constant focus of Serbian economic policy. Serbia has strong trade links with the European Union (EU), which accounts for roughly 63% of its exports. Policymakers have debated using expansionary fiscal policy to support economic growth, focusing on infrastructure development and public investment.
Table 1: Selected Macroeconomic Indicators for Serbia (2022)
| Indicator | Value |
|---|---|
| Population | 6.9 million |
| Nominal GDP (US$) | 65.2 billion |
| GDP in 2021 (US$) | 63.5 billion |
| Unemployment rate | 9.8% |
| Inflation rate | 11.5% |
| Gini coefficient | 0.35 |
Table 2: Labour Market Data for Serbia (2022)
| Population Over 15 (millions) | Employed (millions) | Unemployed (millions) |
|---|---|---|
| 5.0 | 3.5 | 0.38 |
Table 3: Domestic Market for Raspberries in Serbia
| Price (RSD per kg) | Quantity Demanded (tonnes) | Quantity Supplied (tonnes) |
|---|---|---|
| 300 | 680,000 | 640,000 |
| 350 | 620,000 | 680,000 |
Figure 1 (not shown) illustrates the domestic demand (Dd) and supply (Sd) for raspberries in Serbia, where the equilibrium price in 2022 was 300 RSD per kg. By early 2023, the price reached 350 RSD per kg as global demand picked up.
Using the information in Table 2, calculate the unemployment rate in Serbia for 2022.
Using the information in Table 1, calculate the approximate real GDP growth rate from 2021 to 2022 for Serbia.
Using information from Table 3 (and Figure 1), calculate the price elasticity of demand for raspberries when the price increases from 300 RSD to 350 RSD.
Using information from Table 3 (and Figure 1), calculate the price elasticity of supply for raspberries when the price increases from 300 RSD to 350 RSD.
Define the term “Keynesian multiplier.”
Using an AD/AS diagram, explain how an increase in government infrastructure spending might affect Serbia’s real output.
Using the information in Table 1, calculate Serbia’s approximate post-tax Gini coefficient if new government policy successfully reduces income inequality by 14%.
Using information from the text, explain how continuing inflation at 11.5% might impact real wages in Serbia.
Using the text/data provided and knowledge of economics, recommend a policy which could be implemented by the government of Serbia in order to reduce the unemployment rate.
Italy is the Eurozone’s third largest economy. Although it experienced a sharp contraction in 2020 due to the global pandemic, economic recovery followed in 2021 and 2022, partly driven by an upturn in manufacturing and consumer spending. Italy’s unemployment rate, however, remains higher than the European Union average. Income inequality, measured by the Gini coefficient, is moderate but still a concern for policymakers aiming to promote inclusive growth.
Italian coffee culture remains a vital part of domestic consumption. Table 2 provides data for the market for coffee beans. Despite fluctuations in demand and price, Italy’s coffee imports and exports of processed coffee products continue to be important for the country’s trade balance.
In 2021, Italy’s exports of manufactured goods such as machinery and vehicles led to a small trade surplus, as shown in Table 3. The government also relies on progressive income taxes to finance public spending. Some economists argue that a well-designed policy could improve both growth prospects and income distribution.
Table 1: Selected Macroeconomic Data for Italy
| Year | Real GDP (billion €) | Real GDP growth (%) | Unemployment rate (%) | Gini coefficient |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 1,650 | -8.9 | 9.3 | 0.33 |
| 2021 | 1,730 | 4.8 | 9.5 | 0.34 |
| 2022 | 1,795 | 3.8 | 8.9 | 0.33 |
Table 2: Market for Coffee Beans in Italy (Hypothetical Data)
| Price per kg (€) | Quantity Demanded (thousand kg/month) | Quantity Supplied (thousand kg/month) |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | 35 | 18 |
| 9 | 32 | 23 |
| 10 | 29 | 29 |
| 11 | 25 | 34 |
Table 3: Italy’s Key Trade Data (2021)
| Exports (billion €) | Imports (billion €) | Main Export Goods (share %) | Main Import Goods (share %) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 510 | 480 | Machinery (18%), Vehicles (10%), Food & Beverage (8%) | Energy (15%), Machinery (14%), Chemicals (12%) |
Using the information in Table 2, calculate the price elasticity of demand (PED) for coffee beans when the price increases from €9 to €10 per kg.
Using the data in Table 1, calculate the approximate percentage change in Italy’s real GDP from 2020 to 2022.
Refer to Table 3. Calculate the net exports for Italy in 2021 and state whether the trade balance was in surplus or deficit.
Using information in Table 2, calculate the excess demand or excess supply of coffee beans at a price of €8 per kg.
Define the term “progressive tax.”
Using an aggregate demand and aggregate supply (AD/AS) diagram, explain how a rise in consumer spending (as indicated by the increase in real GDP in Table 1) might affect real output and the price level in Italy.
Using the information in Table 2, calculate the price elasticity of supply (PES) for coffee beans when the price increases from €9 to €10 per kg.
Using information from the text above, explain how income inequality might pose a challenge to Italy’s long-term economic growth.
Using the text/data provided and your knowledge of economics, recommend a policy which could be implemented by the Italian government to promote more equitable economic growth.
Explain the concept of price elasticity of supply (PES) and how it is calculated.
Using real-world examples, evaluate tradable permits as a measure to reduce environmental damage.
Austria is a landlocked country in Central Europe with a population of approximately 9 million. It has a high-income economy, diversified across manufacturing, services, and a thriving tourism sector. During 2022, tourism alone contributed about 15% of Austria’s gross domestic product (GDP), fueled by both winter sports and year-round cultural tourism.
Austria’s real GDP growth rate moderately improved between 2019 and 2022, assisted by strong consumer demand, increasing trade with neighboring economies (most notably Germany), and an expansionary fiscal stance. Government spending on infrastructure has grown, although policy makers closely watch any inflationary pressures that could arise from such fiscal expansion.
Despite relatively low inequality levels compared to many other developed nations, Austria’s Gini coefficient has inched upward from 0.26 a decade ago to around 0.28 in 2022. Debates on whether to reform personal income tax rates or strengthen social welfare programs have gained attention.
In terms of taxation, Austria uses a progressive personal income tax system with a top marginal rate of 55%. Corporate income taxes for resident firms currently stand at 25%, although there have been proposals to reduce this rate to 22%. To stimulate the economy further, the government allocated €5 billion in 2022 toward infrastructure projects, anticipating that the Keynesian multiplier would raise overall economic activity significantly.
Table 1 below shows simplified data on the Austrian ski package market, while Tables 2–4 provide additional macroeconomic and distribution information that will be referred to in the questions.
Table 1: The Market for Austrian Ski Packages (2021–2022)
| Year | Average Price per Package (EUR) | Quantity Demanded (millions) | Quantity Supplied (millions) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 900 | 4.0 | 3.8 |
| 2022 | 960 | 3.6 | 4.0 |
Table 2: Nominal GDP and Price Index in Austria (2019–2022)
| Year | Nominal GDP (billion EUR) | Price Index (2015=100) |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 390 | 104 |
| 2020 | 382 | 105 |
| 2021 | 400 | 106 |
| 2022 | 425 | 108 |
Table 3: Selected Economic Indicators (2022)
| Government Infrastructure Spending (billion EUR) | Marginal Propensity to Consume (MPC) | Proposed Corporate Tax Rate (%) | Current Personal Income Tax Rate (progressive, top rate) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 0.75 | 25 | 55% |
Table 4: Income Distribution Data in Austria (2022)
| Income Group | Average Annual Income (EUR) | Population Share (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Highest quintile (Q5) | 65,000 | 20 |
| Fourth quintile (Q4) | 50,000 | 20 |
| Third quintile (Q3) | 35,000 | 20 |
| Second quintile (Q2) | 25,000 | 20 |
| Lowest quintile (Q1) | 15,000 | 20 |
Using information from Table 1, calculate the price elasticity of demand (PED) for Austrian ski packages between 2021 and 2022.
Using the information in Table 3, calculate the total potential change in GDP if the government spends €5 billion on infrastructure and there is no crowding out.
Using data from Table 2, calculate Austria’s real GDP in 2022.
Using data from Table 1, calculate the price elasticity of supply (PES) for ski packages between 2021 and 2022.
Define the term “Keynesian multiplier.”
Explain why an economy that relies heavily on tourism might encounter risks to its macroeconomic stability.
Using information from Table 4, calculate the ratio of average annual income between the highest quintile (Q5) and lowest quintile (Q1). Show your working.
Using information from Table 4 (and the text above), explain how Austria’s relatively low Gini coefficient might influence its long-term economic growth and social outcomes.
Using the text/data provided and knowledge of economics, recommend one policy that the Austrian government could implement to diversify its economy beyond tourism while ensuring sustainable, long-term economic growth.
Explain the determinants of the price elasticity of supply.
Using real-world examples, evaluate the effects of subsidies on all stakeholders (firms, consumers, government).