Nature of the genocide and other crimes against humanity
- Scale and Atrocity
- The 1994 Rwandan genocide is regarded as one of the most horrific and systematically executed crimes against humanity in modern history.
- Over approximately 100 days, an estimated 800,000 Tutsi and moderate Hutu were murdered by Hutu extremists.
- Definition of Genocide
- The term “genocide” is defined under the 1948 United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.
- It refers to acts committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group.
- Application to Rwanda
- In Rwanda, the intent was clear: extermination of the Tutsi population.
- This was demonstrated through:
- The large scale and organization of the killings.
- The use of propaganda and planning by government forces.
- The participation of both state and non-state actors.
- Unique Character of the Violence
- The genocide was often localized, intimate, and driven by personal and communal relationships.
- This made the violence especially devastating in scope and memory.
Recognition of the Rwandan Genocide
- UN and International Recognition
- The Rwandan genocide was officially recognized as a genocide by the United Nations and multiple international bodies.
- The UN formally recognized the atrocities under the 1948 Genocide Convention.
- UN Security Council Resolution 955 (1994)
- The UN Security Council passed Resolution 955, which established the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR).
- The resolution affirmed that “genocide and other systematic, widespread, and flagrant violations of international humanitarian law” had occurred in Rwanda.
- International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR)
- The ICTR was created to prosecute those responsible for the genocide.
- Its judgments repeatedly referred to the events as genocide, convicting individuals for committing, inciting, or participating.
- In 1998, the ICTR delivered the first-ever international conviction for genocide in the Jean-Paul Akayesu case.
- Broader Global Recognition
- Various governments and international organizations (e.g. Human Rights Watch, the African Union, and numerous national courts) have also recognized the Rwandan genocide.
- These bodies consistently referred to the events as genocide in their reports and rulings.
Characteristics of the Rwandan Genocide
- Participation of Civilians and Militias
- The genocide involved both organized groups (such as the Interahamwe and Impuzamugambi militias) and ordinary civilians.
- Around 200,000 Hutu civilians participated.
- Motivations ranged from propaganda and personal gain to coercion under threat of death.
- Role of Media
- RTLM broadcasts and publications such as Kangura played a prominent role in the massacre.
- These outlets incited violence and encouraged civilians to see their Tutsi neighbors as enemies.
- Media propaganda helped to normalize mass murder and intensify ethnic hatred.
- Methods of Killing
- The violence was intensely cruel and prolonged.
- Weapons included machetes, spears, spiked clubs (impiri), crude tools, grenades, and firearms.
- Victims were often mutilated, left to die slowly, or deliberately disabled (e.g. tendons cut to prevent escape).
- Bodies were mutilated, piled in mass graves, left in latrines, or left to rot in public as a warning.
- Documented Brutality (ICTR Findings)
- The ICTR recorded extensive evidence of extreme brutality.
- Women suffered horrific mutilations: breasts cut off, sexual assault with weapons, and facial disfigurement to erase ethnic identity.
- Men and boys were frequently subjected to genital mutilation.
- Some victims were forced to dig their own graves or were massacred in groups inside churches and schools.
- The use of firearms and grenades was common, but killings often relied on hand-held weapons to maximize terror.
Imports of Machetes Before the Genocide
- Scale of Imports
- Between 1991 and early 1994, Rwanda imported between 366 and 581 metric tonnes of machetes, enough to arm about one-third of all adult Hutu.
- Purchases were funded by development loans that were officially intended for agriculture and economic support.
- Some loans explicitly banned military use, but machetes were misclassified to disguise paramilitary intent.
- Sources and Distribution
- International financiers and domestic businesses both played a role.
- Chinese-sourced machetes were imported in bulk.
- The Chillington plant sold unusually high quantities in late 1993, raising alarms even within the company.
- Human Rights Watch later found that machetes were distributed by the government to civilian militias.
- Implications for Planning the Genocide
- The scale of imports demonstrated that the genocide was planned in advance with sophisticated logistics and multiple institutional actors involved.
- These machetes formed the backbone of the genocide.
- Propaganda referred to them directly, urging Hutu to “cut the tall trees”, a euphemism for killing Tutsi.
Scale and Spread of the Killings
- Massacres in Key Locations
- At Nyarubuye, massacres unfolded over several days.
- In Butare province, around 60% of victims were killed with machetes, highlighting the hands-on and localized nature of the violence.
- Nationwide Spread
- The genocide was not limited to local violence.
- It engulfed nearly the entire country within days.
- Beginning in Kigali on April 7, 1994, the violence spread rapidly to both rural and urban areas.
- Role of Administrative Structures
- Rwanda’s administrative system divided the country into communes led by local officials loyal to the government.
- These officials often incited or coerced civilians into participating.
- Their involvement allowed genocidal orders to be disseminated quickly and efficiently.
- Systematic Violence
- The speed and coordination of killings across prefectures made the genocide uniquely widespread.
- Nearly every region of Rwanda experienced systematic violence.


