Overview
- The League of Nations was created after World War I as part of the Treaty of Versailles.
- Its goal was to ensure peace through collective security, prevent future wars, and resolve conflicts through diplomacy rather than violence.
- The League struggled to enforce its decisions, especially as the 1930s brought increased aggression from fascist powers like Italy and Germany.
- It had limited power, no standing army, and was weakened by the absence of the USA, and later by the withdrawal or defiance of key powers like Japan, Germany, and Italy.
Successes and Failures of the League in Europe
Successes
- The League resolved minor border disputes like the Aaland Islands (1921) between Finland and Sweden.
- It helped settle the Upper Silesia dispute (1921) between Germany and Poland with a peaceful plebiscite.
- The League managed the Greek-Bulgarian crisis (1925), stopping the fighting quickly and fairly.
- It helped refugees and fought diseases through its humanitarian agencies.
Failures
- It failed to prevent Italy's invasion of Abyssinia (1935) and Japan’s invasion of Manchuria (1931).
- In Europe, the League could not stop Hitler’s remilitarization of the Rhineland (1936) or Germany’s expansion into Austria and Czechoslovakia.
- It couldn’t enforce economic sanctions effectively or take military action.
- Explain why the League was successful in small cases, but failed when major powers were involved.
- Some students say the League “did nothing.” That’s not true! It had real successes in the 1920s. Focus on the difference between its early peacekeeping and its later inability to stop aggression.
The Search for Collective Security
- Collective security meant that all members of the League would protect each other if one was attacked.
- It was supposed to be a peace guarantee, as in no more secret alliances or military buildup.
Why it failed
- The USA never joined, which made the League weaker from the start.
- Britain and France disagreed on how to use force and often prioritized their own interests.
- Countries like Germany, Italy, and Japan left the League or ignored its rulings.
- Appeasement in the 1930s (letting aggressors get what they wanted to avoid war) undermined collective security.
- In essays about collective security, show how the idea was strong in theory but weak in practice, especially as national interest and appeasement took over.
- Students often confuse collective security with military alliances. The League was not a military alliance. It relied on diplomacy and sanctions, which proved ineffective.
The Vilna Dispute (1920–1923)
Context:
- After World War I, Vilna (modern-day Vilnius, capital of Lithuania) became a disputed city.
- It had been part of the Russian Empire, but after the war, Lithuania claimed it as its capital.
- However, the city had a large Polish population, and Poland wanted to claim it too.
- In October 1920, a Polish general, Lucjan Żeligowski, staged a fake "mutiny" and seized Vilna, acting with the unofficial support of the Polish government.
League of Nations' Role
- Lithuania appealed to the League, demanding Poland withdraw.
- The League tried to mediate, but Poland refused to cooperate and held a public vote (plebiscite) that confirmed Polish control.
- The League did not take further action, and the city officially became part of Poland in 1923.
- This outcome weakened the League’s authority, especially in Eastern Europe, where ethnic conflict and border disputes were common.
Significance
- This is a clear example of the League’s inability to enforce its decisions when larger or more assertive powers (like Poland) defied its authority.
- It showed that smaller states like Lithuania couldn’t count on the League for protection.
- The dispute hurt confidence in collective security, especially among the successor states of Eastern Europe (like Czechoslovakia, Hungary, and the Baltics).
- It also foreshadowed Poland’s later aggressive actions in the 1930s (e.g., occupation of Teschen in 1938).
Successor States of Central and Eastern Europe
- After the collapse of the Austro-Hungarian, Russian, and Ottoman Empires, new countries were created. These were called successor states. These included:
- Austria,
- Hungary,
- Czechoslovakia,
- Poland,
- Yugoslavia,
- Finland,
- Latvia,
- Lithuania, and
- Estonia
Key Issues These States Faced
- Many had ethnic minorities, leading to tension and border disputes.
- Most were weak democracies that became authoritarian during the 1920s and 1930s.
- Many suffered from economic instability and poor international trade.
- Some (like Poland and Hungary) revised borders by force or through alliances with larger powers (e.g., Nazi Germany).
Role of the League
- The League often failed to stop border conflicts between these states (e.g., Poland vs. Lithuania over Vilna).
- It had little influence when internal political struggles turned countries into dictatorships.
- Students sometimes treat the successor states as a “bonus topic.” But they are central to understanding the League’s failure to bring peace to Eastern Europe.
- Always include at least one detailed example (e.g., Czechoslovakia or Poland).
- Assess the successes and failures of the League of Nations in Europe between 1920 and 1939.
- To what extent did the concept of collective security fail in the interwar years?
- Examine the challenges faced by the successor states of Central and Eastern Europe after 1919, and the role of the League of Nations in addressing them.


