Political Contributions
- George Washington in the United States provided stable political leadership during and after the American Revolution. As commander-in-chief, he united the colonies and later helped shape the U.S. Constitution, ensuring the new republic avoided monarchy and preserved civilian control of the military.
- Simón Bolívar in northern South America envisioned a united Latin America under republican rule. His political vision, expressed in the Jamaica Letter (1815) and Angostura Address (1819), called for strong central governments to preserve unity after independence.
- José de San Martín in the southern regions of South America established provisional governments in liberated territories, promoting stability and moderation. He avoided authoritarianism and emphasized order and legitimacy as foundations for new nations.
- All three leaders faced the challenge of transforming revolutionary ideals into functioning governments, revealing the tension between idealism and political reality in postcolonial states.
Intellectual Contributions
- Enlightenment thought influenced all three leaders. Washington drew from Locke’s ideas of liberty and natural rights, Bolívar admired Rousseau’s concept of the social contract, and San Martín was influenced by liberal reformers in Spain and France.
- Bolívar’s writings emphasized the dangers of tyranny and anarchy, arguing that Latin America needed unity to survive both internal division and external threats.
- Washington’s farewell address in 1796 reflected Enlightenment values of civic virtue, warning against factionalism and foreign entanglements. These ideas became guiding principles of U.S. political identity.
- San Martín, though not known for extensive writing, embodied Enlightenment ideals through his restraint, discipline, and belief that liberty must coexist with stability. His leadership showed the importance of moral character in revolution.
Liberal Reformer
A leader or thinker who advocates for gradual political and social change based on Enlightenment and liberal principles.
Factionalism
The division of a political movement, party, or government into competing groups or factions, each pursuing its own interests or ideology.
José de San Martín’s Liberation of Chile and Peru
- José de San Martín was a key leader in South America’s fight for independence, known for his discipline, careful planning, and belief in stable, orderly government.
- After helping Argentina gain independence, he created the “Plan of the Andes” to defeat Spanish control in Chile and Peru, the main centers of royalist power.
- In 1817, he led about 5,000 soldiers on a dangerous crossing of the Andes Mountains, facing freezing weather and thin air, but won a major victory at the Battle of Chacabuco, freeing Chile.
- With more success at Maipú (1818), San Martín then sailed to Peru in 1820, where he used both military strength and diplomacy to convince local leaders to support independence.
- He declared Peruvian independence in 1821 and became Protector of Peru to keep order while the new nation was forming.
- In 1822, San Martín met Simón Bolívar, decided to step aside to avoid civil war, and retired from politics, showing that he valued peace and unity more than personal power.
Military Contributions
- Washington’s leadership at Trenton (1776) and Yorktown (1781) turned the tide of the American Revolution. His discipline, morale building, and use of flexible tactics helped an inexperienced army defeat Britain.
- Bolívar led campaigns that liberated vast regions, including Venezuela, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, and Bolivia. Victories at Boyacá (1819) and Carabobo (1821) demonstrated his strategic brilliance and persistence.
- San Martín achieved decisive victories in the south, crossing the Andes in 1817 to liberate Chile at Chacabuco and Maipú, and later freeing Peru in 1821. His disciplined multinational army reflected his professional training.
- Their combined achievements broke European power across the Americas. However, Bolívar and San Martín’s 1822 meeting in Guayaquil exposed their differing visions: Bolívar sought continental unity, while San Martín prioritized stable, independent republics.
- Oversimplifying leadership styles by portraying Washington, Bolívar, and San Martín as similar heroic figures rather than examining their distinct goals and contexts.
- Ignoring the intellectual foundations of their revolutions and focusing only on their military roles.
- Stopping the analysis at independence victories and neglecting to discuss how each leader’s legacy influenced post-independence governance and stability.
- Structure essays by separating political, intellectual, and military contributions to directly address the command terms of the question.
- Support analysis with evidence from primary sources such as Bolívar’s Jamaica Letter, Washington’s Farewell Address, and San Martín’s Proclamation of Independence in Peru.
- Discuss limitations as well as successes to show nuanced understanding. For example, Bolívar’s dream of unity failed, and Washington’s republic struggled with slavery and inequality.
- Examine the political, intellectual, and military contributions of George Washington, Simón Bolívar, and José de San Martín to the independence movements in the Americas.
- Compare and contrast the leadership styles and visions of Bolívar and San Martín in achieving and shaping Latin American independence.
- To what extent did Enlightenment ideas influence the actions and legacies of independence leaders in the Americas?


