State, National, and Local Governments, and Agencies
- National governments prioritize development to ensure legitimacy, stability, and improved living standards. Development aims differ by country:
- US: job creation and economic growth.
- China: high-quality socialist development.
- South Africa: education, healthcare, infrastructure.
- Governments address:
- Domestic development
- Global poverty reduction
China: Economic Growth vs. Developmental Costs
- Background
- Since 1978: avg. 9% GDP growth/year
- Over 800 million lifted out of poverty (largest in history)
- Growth driven by:
- High investment
- Export-led manufacturing
- Low-cost labour
- Developmental Costs
- Environmental degradation:
- Severe air & water pollution
- High greenhouse gas emissions
- Damage from carbon-intensive industries
- Human rights concerns:
- Labour exploitation
- Unsafe working conditions
- Excessive overtime, exposure to harmful chemicals
- Environmental degradation:
- Key Insight
- Demonstrates trade-offs between:
- Economic growth
- Social justice
- Environmental sustainability
- Raises concerns about the long-term sustainability and ethics of growth-first models
- Demonstrates trade-offs between:
Other State & National Approaches to Development
- Wellbeing Economy Governments (WEGo) – e.g. Finland, Iceland, New Zealand, Bhutan
- Focus on social, political, environmental, and human development rather than GDP.
- Strategies include:
- Finland: Health literacy taught in schools
- Italy: Climate education made compulsory (ages 3–19)
- Bhutan: Uses Gross National Happiness as a development measure
- Development priorities vary by state, not all focus on economic growth alone.
International Development & Poverty Reduction
- States also contribute externally via international development aid:
- US: $32 billion (2024 budget) for USAID
- EU: Over €50 billion annually
- China: Around $2.9 billion by 2020
- Much aid is classified as foreign aid, which may include:
- Development projects
- Humanitarian support
- Military assistance
- If states are self-interested, why do they fund global development?
Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) and NGOs in Development
- Key Features of NGOs/CSOs:
- Independent from governments and commercial interests
- Focused on humanitarian or development goals
- Often operate with local knowledge and niche expertise
- Not motivated by profit or political control, allowing more flexibility
- Can highlight human rights abuses without political constraints
- Limitations:
- May rely on state funding, affecting independence
- Operate under constraints in politically sensitive regions
International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC)
- Overview:
- Neutral, humanitarian CSO operating in 100+ countries (est. 1863)
- Key missions:
- Reactive: Respond to conflict and humanitarian crises
- Preventative: Reduce causes of suffering and conflict
- Focus Areas (2023):
- Afghanistan, Ethiopia, Sahel, Sudan, Syria, Ukraine, Yemen
- Key Statistics (Afghanistan, 2022):
- 6.3M medical consultations
- 13,981 households received cash aid
- 18,732 new patients (incl. 1,456 amputees)
- 362,044 physiotherapy sessions
Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF)
- Overview:
- Medical NGO active globally since 1971
- Offers long-term care and crisis response
- Focus: education, epidemics, and health access (e.g. Ebola, Haiti quake)
- Strengths:
- Independent: no EU/government funding since 2016
- Avoids alignment with military actors
- Can expose rights abuses
- Limitations:
- Limited funding may constrain scope and scale
COPE (Community Outreach and Patient Empowerment)
- Overview:
- Small NGO working with Navajo Nation (US)
- Focus on chronic illness, healthcare equity, and food sovereignty
- Strengths of Small NGOs:
- More responsive and efficient
- Deeper community trust
- Can meet development goals effectively at local level
- Challenges:
- Limited reach and recognition
- Harder to secure large-scale funding
- Less access to professional networks and support
- How do CSOs and NGOs challenge traditional, state-led models of development?
- Why might a government choose to fund international development aid despite acting primarily in its own national interest?
- What are the implications of relying heavily on state funding for NGO independence and effectiveness?


