Mitigation of adverse effects Questionbank

aesthetic impact

driving factors

biological diversity

economic cost

It focuses on accelerating the extraction of new raw materials.

It prioritizes the incineration of all waste products to generate energy.

It relies on using non-recyclable materials to reduce industrial costs.

It keeps materials in use for as long as possible to reduce the need for new resources.

To ensure the project does not negatively affect the livelihoods or culture of local people

To prioritize the needs of invasive species over the needs of humans

To ensure that no scientists are allowed to enter the restoration site

To guarantee that the project will be completed in less than one year

True

False

To prevent inbreeding and ensure population stability

To increase the rate of biomass production

To make the species more attractive for public display

To allow the species to adapt to non-native environments

To prevent inbreeding and ensure long-term population stability

To ensure all offspring have identical phenotypic traits

To reduce the survival rate of individuals in the wild

To speed up the mutation rate for faster adaptation

Mitigation focuses on reducing or repairing harm that has resulted from human activity, whereas conservation focuses on the protection and preservation of natural resources.

Mitigation is a proactive strategy intended to prevent all future human impact, whereas conservation is a reactive strategy used to repair past damage.

Mitigation refers only to the reduction of atmospheric pollutants, whereas conservation refers only to the management of biological organisms.

Mitigation and conservation are interchangeable terms that describe identical environmental management processes.

To subsidize the use of non-native vegetation

To help developing nations adopt expensive renewable technologies

To fund the extraction of more fossil fuels

To pay for the relocation of invasive species

Global marketing firms

Individual consumers in urban areas

Local communities and Indigenous groups

International shipping companies

Focusing only on physical restoration while ignoring social impacts

Inclusive collaboration with local communities and Indigenous groups

Relying solely on international funding without local oversight

Excluding industry stakeholders from the planning process