The Six Mini-Theories of Self-Determination Theory
Self-determination theory
Self-determination theory (SDT) is a theory that explains how people are motivated and develop their personalities. It also examines how social and cultural factors affect motivation and well-being.
- Self-Determination Theory (SDT) is a comprehensive framework for understanding motivation.
- SDT is based on an organismic-dialectic approach to human motivation, psychological development, and well-being:
1. Organismic Aspect
- Humans have an innate drive to grow, develop, and reach their full potential.
- Certain fundamental psychological needs are essential for motivation:
- Autonomy – Having choices and control over actions.
- Competence – Feeling capable and effective.
- Relatedness – Feeling connected to others.
2. Dialectic Aspect
- Focuses on the interaction between individuals and their environment.
- Recognizes that social and environmental influences (e.g., family, culture) shape motivation and behavior.
- External factors can either support or hinder motivation.
Note
- Therefore, SDT consists of six mini-theories, each addressing a specific aspect of motivation:
- Cognitive Evaluation Theory
- Organismic Integration Theory
- Causality Orientations Theory
- Basic Psychological Needs Theory
- Goal Contents Theory
- Relationships Motivation Theory
Cognitive Evaluation Theory: The Role of Rewards
- Cognitive Evaluation Theory focuses on how external factors, like rewards, influence intrinsic motivation. It highlights two key needs:
- Autonomy: The feeling of being in control of one's actions.
- Competence: The belief in one's ability to succeed.
A footballer who plays for enjoyment (intrinsic) may lose motivation if they only focus on salary (extrinsic).
- Cognitive Evaluation Theory suggests that external events influence intrinsic motivation in three ways:
- Social Environment
- Provides informational feedback about performance (e.g., how well someone is doing in sports).
- Positive feedback enhances competence, boosting intrinsic motivation.
- Controlling Events
- Rewards (e.g., money, trophies) can make individuals feel controlled by others.
- This can decrease intrinsic motivation due to the over-justification effect (doing an activity for the rewardrather than for enjoyment).
- Amotivating Events
- Negative feedback, criticism, or feelings of incompetence can reduce intrinsic motivation.
- Leads to decreased engagement and lower self-confidence in performance.
- Social Environment
How Rewards Affect Motivation
- Informational Rewards: Provide feedback that enhances competence (e.g., praise for mastering a skill). These support intrinsic motivation.
- Controlling Rewards: Focus on compliance (e.g., monetary incentives). These undermine intrinsic motivation, leading to the over justification effect.
When using rewards, focus on providing feedback that enhances autonomy and competence rather than controlling behavior.
Organismic Integration Theory: The Spectrum of Extrinsic Motivation
- Organismic Integration Theory explains how extrinsic motivation can become more self-determined over time.
- It identifies four subtypes of extrinsic motivation along a continuum:
- Extrinsic Regulation: Behavior is driven by external demands or rewards. I must exercise because my doctor said so)
- Introjected Regulation: Behavior is driven by internal pressure, such as guilt or shame. I should exercise to avoid feeling guilty.
- Identified Regulation: Behavior is personally valued, though still a means to an end. (I want to exercise because it improves my health.)
- Integrated Regulation: Behavior aligns with personal values and identity. (Exercise is part of who I am.)
A runner may initially train to please their coach (external) but later do it because they value fitness (identified).
Note- Don't confuse introjected regulation with intrinsic motivation. While both involve internal feelings, introjected regulation is driven by pressure (e.g., guilt), not genuine enjoyment.
- These orientations are shaped by past experiences and the social environment.
- When these needs are met, motivation and well-being flourish. When thwarted, they lead to decreased motivation and negative outcomes.


