The Anti-Comintern Pact: Japan, Germany, and the Drive to Isolate the USSR
- This section will show both the events and the responses together, as it is not possible to follow the rapid development of occurrences if not presented as a continuum.
- We have seen that the army in Japan was a key actor in its expansion. While they were fighting the Second Sino Japanese war, there were plans to expand further.
- With that aim in mind, in 1936 Japan and Germany had signed the Anti Comintern Pact.
- In 1937, Italy would join the same pact.
- The Anti Comintern Pact was an agreement against the USSR.
- It stated that the signatories would conduct mutual consultation on measures against Communist “subversion” and commit not to sign agreements with the USSR.
- The main aim was geopolitical: Germany and Japan wanted to isolate the USSR.
- Germany because Hitler´s plans of expansion needed to avoid the possibility of a two front war.
- Japan because they wanted to cement their control over Manchuria, which bordered the Soviets.
- In August 1939, Hitler and Stalin signed the Nazi Soviet Pact (also called the Ribbentrop-Molotov pact).
- Japan felt betrayed by Germany, and withdrew from the Anti Comintern pact.
- Japanese foreign policy seemed to become more independent, and they declared that they would create a Great East Asian Co-Prosperity Sphere, pooling together Asian nations to rid them from “Western influence”.
- With this in mind, Japan entered French Indochina (modern-day Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia) in June 1940.
- France had been the colonial power that controlled Indochina, but after France fell under Nazi rule, Japan pressured the Vichy Regime to allow Japanese troops into northern French Indochina.
Ironically, it was Hitler who betrayed the Pact when he signed the Nazi-Soviet Pact in 1939.
- The Vichy Regime was the authoritarian government of France from 1940 to 1944, led by Marshal Philippe Pétain.
- It was created after France's forces were defeated by the Nazi Army.
Tripartite Pact
- In September of 1940, Japan will expand into Indochina and start building bases. In parallel, they signed the Tripartite Pact with Germany and Italy.
- The Tripartite Pact of September 1940 established the the signatories would assist one another with military and economic means if one party was attacked by a country not involved in the European War or in the Sino Japanese conflict.
- It also established the recognition of spheres of influence in Europe (Germany and Italy) and East Asia (Japan) and Germany renounced its claim to the former colonies it had owned in the Pacific prior to the First World War, which Japan had subsequently acquired.
- Why did Japan join Germany again after Hitler signed the pact with Stalin?
- It is important to have in mind that the Anti Comintern Pact was an ideological alliance against communism, while the Tripartite Pact was a military and political agreement.
- What the Tripartite pact was aiming at was to deter the US from aiding countries (particularly Britain) in WW2
- That was the “power” that could “attack” Italy, Japan or Germany that was “not already involved” in the European or the Chinese theatre.
Japanese Expansion in Indochina
- At the same time, Japan was still fighting in China. There was a debate within the Japanese military between expanding into the Soviet - Manchurian/Mongolian border or into the South, meaning Indochina.
- But in September 1939 the Soviets defeated Japanese forces in the Mongolian-Manchurian border and that prompted them to focus on Indochina.
- In April 1941, after the Tripartite Pact and the already established control of parts of Indochina, Japan signed a Non-Aggression Treaty with the USSR, and further attention was given to Indochina.
- In July 1941, Japan expands into the South of Indochina, and this is the turning point for the relations between the US and Japan.
- Why did the US care about Indochina?
- The US did not have colonial control over Indochina, but they did have economic interests.
- In particular, they valued the trade routes Indochina offered to Southeast Asian markets and the ones through the Pacific.
- They also bought Indochina’s rubber and tin.
- All of this explains why the US wanted to protect France as a colonial power and rejected Japan’s control over the territory.
US Response
- The US responded to Japan’s control of Indochina with an oil embargo.
- The embargo meant that Japan would not be supplied with American oil anymore, and this meant a heavy blow to Japan’s war effort.
- Keep in mind that Japan’s expansion had been fundamentally driven by the lack of natural resources in general, and of oil resources in particular.
- Ships, planes and vehicles, as well as the rest of Japanese industry depended on oil imports, and the US was a key partner.
Japanese Response
- Within Japan, there were divergent positions regarding how to respond to the US’ embargo.
- One standpoint wanted to push for diplomatic negotiations to lift the embargo, but eventually the most ultra nationalist and aggressive stance prevailed, and General Tojo prepared the attack on Pearl Harbor.
- Why did Japan attack Pearl Harbor?
- The Traditional view sees the attack as the way in which Japan thought they would dominante Asia. The US oil embargo is seen as a provocation that Japan had to respond to.
- For Japanese historiography, Japan attacked Pearl Harbor to secure access to resources and due to the strong nationalist ideology, that saw the US embargo as a threat to national survival.
Pearl Harbor and the Pacific, 7th December 1941
- Japan launched a widespread military campaign across the Pacific, targeting multiple Allied positions.
- The most significant strike was on Pearl Harbor, the central U.S. naval base in Hawaii.
- Six aircraft carriers deployed 353 planes in two waves, attacking American ships, airfields, and military installations using bombs, torpedoes, and gunfire.
- US forces were damaged: four battleships were sunk, and cruiser, destroyers, other vessels and 188 aircraft were lost.
- Around 2400 people were killed and 1200 wounded.
- However Japan failed to eliminate key U.S. assets, notably the three aircraft carriers, which were out on maneuvers, and important fuel and torpedo depots.
- The following day, the United States formally declared war on Japan, marking its entry into World War II.
- Although Japan achieved short-term tactical success, the failure to destroy critical American infrastructure contributed to its eventual defeat in August 1945.
- How relevant was Pearl Harbor to explain why the US entered WW2?
- For traditional historiography, Pearl Harbor was a decisive event that plunged the US into WW2.
- This point of view emphasizes the attack took the US by surprise, and had a psychological and political impact that made neutrality no longer an option.
- For the revisionist perspective, Pearl Harbor was the trigger cause, but not the actual reason.
- The US was already involved in global affairs, and they had been issuing policies that showed they had economic and political interests in Europe and Asia.


