Conditions for the Rise to Power of Fidel Castro: Political, Economic and Social
- For the rise to power of Castro, the period 1953-1959 is the one considered by IB and you should focus on events within that period.
- Nevertheless, it is fundamental to understand the conditions in which he made his bid for power and was eventually successful.
Political and Economic Dependency
- Cuba got its independence in 1898, after Spain’s defeat in the Spanish–American War.
- This means that Cuba’s independence movement, led by José Martí, was only able to secure independence from Spain with the aid of the US.
- Because of this, Cuba became a nominally independent republic, but was under significant U.S. control via the Platt Amendment (1901), allowing U.S. intervention in Cuban affairs.
- This external domination bred nationalist resentment.
- Because of this lack of true independence, Cuba’s economy relied almost entirely on sugar exports to the U.S., making it highly vulnerable to market fluctuations.
- The monoculture economy consolidated dependency: Cuba was devoted to sugar cane production, preventing industrialization and cementing Cuban poverty and American domination.
- U.S. companies dominated key sectors, from sugar plantations to utilities, leaving Cuba economically dependent and politically subordinated.
- By the 1950s, U.S. companies owned nearly 70% of Cuban arable land, 90% of the telephone and electricity services, and 50% of the railways.
- They also controlled 40% of the sugar production and 25% of bank deposits.
- Major corporations like United Fruit and ITT dominated key industries.
- This economic dominance fueled resentment among Cubans, who viewed U.S. influence as a neocolonial holdover that benefited elites
- This left much of the population in poverty and dependent on foreign interests.
- The Platt Amendment (1901) was a key provision imposed by the the US and incorporated into the Cuban constitution.
- It allowed the U.S. to intervene in Cuban domestic affairs and control foreign policy and finances. It also granted the U.S. the right to lease naval bases, most notably Guantánamo Bay.
- Though Cuba was officially independent in 1902, the amendment effectively made it a U.S. protectorate.
- This undermined Cuban sovereignty and fueled nationalist resentment.
U.S. investment in Cuba’s hospitality sector and the Volstead Act (Prohibition)
- The Volstead Act (1919), which enforced Prohibition in the U.S., inadvertently boosted American investment in Cuba’s hospitality sector.
- As alcohol was banned at home, wealthy Americans turned to Havana, just 90 miles from Florida, for legal drinking, gambling, and leisure.
- This demand led to rapid development of American-owned hotels, nightclubs, and casinos, especially in Havana’s Vedado district. By the 1950s, U.S. investors owned over 50% of Cuba’s tourist infrastructure, including iconic establishments like the Hotel Nacional.
- U.S. organized crime syndicates, such as those led by Meyer Lansky, capitalized on Batista’s corrupt regime (see below) to establish a lucrative gambling and vice industry in Havana.
- These ventures catered to U.S. tourists, with profits flowing back to American investors and mob figures.
- Meanwhile, most Cubans remained economically marginalized, further deepening resentment and fueling support for revolutionary movements.
Social Inequality
- Despite pockets of prosperity, most rural Cubans lived in poverty, with limited access to healthcare, education, or electricity.
- Seasonal unemployment and illiteracy were widespread in the countryside, fueling popular discontent.
- Although Cuba produced other crops like tobacco, coffee, and rice, none matched the economic dominance of sugar.
- Sugar accounted for up to 80% of export earnings in the 1950s.
- However, sugar cultivation and harvesting were highly seasonal, concentrated between January and May.
- The intense labor demand during harvest was followed by months of near-total unemployment.
- Particularly for manual laborers and rural workers.
- Alternative employment was scarce because Cuba lacked agricultural diversification and industrial development.
- Most small farmers couldn't switch crops or rely on state support, and mechanization further reduced year-round work opportunities.
- As a result, many laborers lived in cyclical poverty, with no stable income or access to healthcare, housing, or education.
- Illiteracy and poverty in Cuba before the Revolution
- Before the revolution, Cuba’s literacy rate was about 76%, but rural illiteracy reached 40–50%.
- While urban literacy was among the highest in Latin America, the rural-urban divide was stark.
- Despite overall prosperity, rural poverty was widespread: 60–70% lacked clean water, electricity, or healthcare; only 10% of homes had electricity and 4% running water.
- Inequality was severe, with the top 10% controlling 40% of income while the bottom 20% earned under 5%.
- As you can see, the majority in Cuba lived in extremely bad conditions.
- Also, the masses saw how the US and elites linked to US interests thrived.
- But is that enough to create a crisis state and a revolution?
- Don’t forget that the basis for the Cuban dependency had been set up in the early 20th C, and the Revolution was only successful in 1959.
- The fact that there are reasons for discontent does not automatically mean that people will get organized and act against the established order.
Corrupt political system
- Before the Cuban Revolution in 1959, Cuba was formally a republic, but in practice, its political system was deeply flawed and often undemocratic.
- A republic means there were three branches of state power: an elected president, a bicameral congress and a judiciary.
- Cuba adopted a democratic republican constitution in 1901, revised in 1940, which was seen as progressive for its time.
- It included universal suffrage, separation of powers, labor protections, and civil rights.
- In practice, the system was undermined by widespread corruption, electoral fraud, and U.S. interference.
- Even during democratic periods (1944–1952), systemic graft and patronage eroded public faith in institutions.
- Fulgencio Batista ruled as an elected president (1940–1944), but returned in 1952 through a military coup, suspending the constitution and ruling as a dictator.
- From 1952–1959, Cuba was a de facto military dictatorship, although it maintained the appearance of a republic.
Fulgencio Batista
- Batista’s first presidency (1940–44): Progressive constitution, legalized Communist Party, introduced social reforms (minimum wage, social security), enjoyed some popularity.
- Return to power (1952): Military coup, suspended constitution, dissolved Congress, ruled by decree.
- Repression: Censorship, imprisonment, extrajudicial killings to suppress dissent.
- U.S. backing: Supported for anti-communism, seen as reliable Cold War ally.
- Economic concessions: U.S. businesses dominated sugar, mining, tourism, utilities, and hotels.
- Impact: U.S. influence deepened, fueling nationalist resentment and opposition that aided Castro’s rise.
Cuba's Economic Problems
- By the late 1950s, Cuba’s economy, being the “sugar bowl of the world”, was severely affected by a significant drop in global sugar prices.
- This decline reduced export revenues, destabilizing government income and increasing economic vulnerability, as sugar accounted for up to 80% of Cuba’s export earnings.
- The price fall worsened trade imbalances, limiting Cuba’s ability to import essential goods.
- Concurrently, rising international oil prices increased the cost of production and transportation, notably impacting sugar mills and related industries.
- Higher energy expenses reduced industrial efficiency and profitability, contributing to inflation as costs were passed onto consumers, thus decreasing purchasing power across the population.
- These economic pressures led to inflation and widespread job insecurity.
- Unemployment rates soared to around 17%, with an additional 13% underemployed by the late 1950s.
- Seasonal sugar work exacerbated instability, especially in rural areas, deepening social unrest and undermining Batista’s regime.
- As you can see, now the weak economic structure and the political dependency become a much more pressing issue due to the external even of the international prices fluctuation.
- This means that a weak structure per se does not necessarily lead to change. More factors need to conflate at a particular moment in time.
Disunity, Corruption, and the Making of a Revolutionary Leader
- Rural workers, urban laborers (that had supported Batista in the 1940s), students, and even sections of the middle and upper classes grew disillusioned with Batista’s regime.
- Yet the opposition lacked unity or strong leadership until Castro’s emergence.
- Moreover, the main political parties such as the Auténticos, Ortodoxos, and communists failed to mobilize meaningful resistance or offer credible alternatives.
- Rampant corruption and internal divisions undermined their credibility and ability to mobilize broad support.
- The Auténticos, despite holding power for much of the 1940s and early 1950s, were seen as self-serving and disconnected from popular concerns.
- The Ortodoxos, while advocating anti-corruption, lacked strong organizational capacity and were fragmented.
- Meanwhile, the communists remained marginal due to Cold War pressures and repression.
- This political weakness created a power and representation vacuum that allowed new actors like Fidel Castro to gain momentum.
- In this vacuum, Fidel Castro, originally from the Orthodox Party, emerged with a radical and nationalist vision that promised social justice, independence from U.S. dominance, and an end to dictatorship.
- Castro’s appeal lay in his combination of populist rhetoric, anti-imperialism, and bold guerrilla action (e.g., Moncada Barracks attack, 1953).
- His leadership crystallized opposition forces and set the stage for revolution.
- As you study, make notes about the different aspects of the conditions of Cuba before Castro’s rise.
- What seems to be more important to explain his emergence: corruption and political weakness, dependency, underdeveloped economy?
- From a structuralist perspective, the conditions in Cuba rather than Castro's unique leadership, were the main drivers of the 1959 revolution.
- For example, scholar Lars Schoultz emphasizes the deep rooted socioeconomic inequalities, U.S. economic domination, and political decay as the key enablers of revolutionary change.
- He suggests that Castro capitalized on these conditions rather than creating the revolution through his personal charisma or vision alone.
- In this sense, the Cuban revolution was a product of systemic crises rather than the individual heroic agency of the leader.


