
Case Studies - Philippines and Pakistan
- Terrorist movements grew from political instability, economic grievances and long-standing ethnic tensions across Asia.
- Weak state institutions created opportunities for extremist actors to organize.
- Economic hardship pushed marginalized groups toward radical ideologies.
- Local separatist struggles used terrorism to gain political visibility.
- Foreign conflicts inspired ideological solidarity among militant groups.
- State repression deepened community resentment, fueling radicalization.

Philippines – Abu Sayyaf and the Mindanao Conflict (1990s–2005)
Origins and Rise
- Abu Sayyaf emerged from a splinter of the Moro separatist movement.
- Poverty in Mindanao increased social vulnerability to radical recruitment.
- Foreign extremist organizations provided training and financial support.
- Political instability after Marcos weakened central authority.
- Ideological rhetoric blended religion with economic grievances.
Impact and National Significance
- Kidnappings and bombings caused national trauma and insecurity.
- Tourism suffered severe economic damage in conflict regions.
- The group disrupted regional stability across the Sulu archipelago.
- Military responses strained community relations with Manila.
- International cooperation increased due to shared security concerns.
Extremism
Advocacy of radical ideas that justify violence for political aims.
Insurgent network
Organized group engaged in armed rebellion against a state.
Sectarian and Ideological Terrorism
- Sectarian divisions and ideological rivalry fueled violent confrontations in several Asian states.
- Competing religious identities created persistent social tensions.
- Radical groups exploited sectarian fear to gain support.
- Political elites sometimes manipulated religious narratives for power.


