IB History Labour Rights and Social Policies Notes

Labour and welfare: The New Deal created rights with exclusions

Mass unemployment changed the political debate

1. Unemployment reached roughly one quarter of the workforce in 1933. Job loss weakened the belief that individuals alone were responsible for poverty.
2. Local relief systems collapsed under demand. Private charities and municipal governments lacked the revenue to support millions.
3. Workers faced falling wages and insecure hours. Employers could use unemployment to resist organization and reduce labour costs.
4. Evictions and hunger became political issues. Unemployed councils, labour groups, churches, and community organizations demanded public action.
   1. Federal responsibility expanded from emergency relief to lasting security. The New Deal moved gradually from temporary programmes toward rights and insurance.

Early New Deal labour policy was unstable

1. The National Industrial Recovery Act recognized collective bargaining in 1933. Section 7(a) promised workers the right to organize and bargain through representatives of their choosing.
2. The promise encouraged union membership. Workers treated federal language as support for organization even when enforcement remained weak.
   1. Company unions and employer resistance continued. Businesses could shape representation or refuse meaningful bargaining.
   2. The National Labor Board attempted mediation. It lacked the independent authority later granted to the NLRB.
   3. The Supreme Court invalidated the NIRA in 1935. The Schechter decision removed the main statutory basis for early labour protection.

The Wagner Act created enforceable labour rights

1. The National Labor Relations Act passed in July 1935. It prohibited specified unfair labour practices and protected collective bargaining.
2. The National Labor Relations Board supervised elections. Workers could choose representatives through a federal process.
3. Employers had to bargain with certified unions. Federal law altered the balance between management and organized labour.
4. The Act excluded agricultural and domestic workers. These occupations included large numbers of Black, Latino, and female workers.
   1. The law strengthened industrial unionism. Legal protection mattered most where workers could organize large workplaces.

The CIO organized mass-production industries

1. The American Federation of Labor emphasized craft unions. Its structure organized skilled trades and often neglected workers across an entire industry.
2. John L. Lewis backed industrial organization. The Committee for Industrial Organization formed in 1935 and later became the Congress of Industrial Organizations.
3. The CIO organized steel, automobiles, rubber, and electrical manufacturing. It recruited workers across skill, ethnic, and racial lines, although discrimination remained.
4. Membership growth gave labour political influence. Unions funded campaigns, registered voters, and supported Roosevelt in 1936.
   1. Industrial unionism connected workplace power to the Democratic coalition. Labour rights became a major partisan dividing line.

Strikes tested the limits of reform

1. Workers used direct action to secure recognition. Law alone did not guarantee contracts because employers still resisted organization.
2. The sit-down tactic occupied company property. It prevented replacement workers from restarting production.
3. The Memorial Day Massacre exposed continuing violence. Chicago police killed ten people during a 1937 steel strike demonstration.
4. The Little Steel strike failed to win immediate recognition. Smaller steel firms resisted the CIO more successfully than US Steel.
   1. Labour gains remained contested. Federal policy opened space for organization but did not remove employer or state coercion.

Social Security created a national framework

1. The Social Security Act passed in August 1935. It established old-age insurance, unemployment insurance, and federal assistance programmes.
2. Old-age pensions relied on payroll contributions. The system connected benefits to covered employment.
3. Unemployment insurance operated through federal-state cooperation. States administered programmes within national requirements.
4. Aid supported selected vulnerable groups. Federal grants helped dependent children, some older people, and people with disabilities.
   1. The Act changed expectations. Economic security became a continuing federal responsibility rather than temporary emergency charity.

Exclusions reproduced inequality

1. Agricultural and domestic workers were excluded from initial old-age and unemployment coverage. The exclusions affected a majority of Black workers in the South and many women nationwide.
2. Seasonal and irregular employment complicated eligibility. Workers with unstable records often struggled to qualify for insurance-based benefits.
3. Local administration allowed discrimination. Officials could vary relief assignments, payment levels, and access.
4. A male-breadwinner model shaped policy. Programmes often treated women as dependants even when they supported households through paid work.
   1. Citizenship and immigration status mattered. Migrant and non-citizen workers faced additional barriers to relief and protection.

Relief programmes offered work without full rights

1. The Works Progress Administration employed millions. Projects built infrastructure and supported education, writing, music, theatre, and art.
2. WPA wages were deliberately below prevailing private rates. Officials wanted relief employment to remain less attractive than private work.
3. The Civilian Conservation Corps targeted young men. Enrollees performed conservation work and sent part of their pay to families.
4. CCC camps were segregated. Black enrolment existed, but leadership and placement reflected racial hierarchy.
   1. Relief work reduced hardship but remained administrative support. Participants did not receive the same collective bargaining rights as private-sector workers.

The Fair Labor Standards Act set national minimums

1. The Fair Labor Standards Act passed in 1938. It established a federal minimum wage, maximum hours, and restrictions on child labour.
2. The initial minimum wage was 25 cents per hour. The law planned increases and a standard 40-hour week after transition.
3. Coverage focused on interstate commerce. Constitutional design linked regulation to federal commerce power.
4. Agricultural and domestic work remained excluded. The pattern of unequal coverage continued.
   1. The Act created lasting national standards. Later amendments expanded coverage and raised minimum requirements.

Women gained opportunities and faced constraints

1. Women worked because family income collapsed. Many entered clerical, service, teaching, domestic, and relief employment.
2. Public criticism targeted married women workers. Some governments and employers restricted employment when husbands had jobs.
3. WPA cultural programmes employed women. But heavy construction and CCC programmes channelled more resources toward men.
4. Frances Perkins shaped labour and welfare law. As secretary of labor, she supported Social Security, unemployment insurance, and wage-hour standards.
   1. Policy widened security without eliminating gender hierarchy. Occupational segregation and dependent-wife assumptions continued.

Black workers combined New Deal access with civil-rights organizing

1. Black unemployment was especially severe. Last hired and first fired practices intensified job loss.
2. The CIO sometimes offered interracial organization. Union strategy in mass industry could challenge racial divisions, though locals varied.
3. A. Philip Randolph pressured the federal government. His threatened 1941 March on Washington later helped secure Executive Order 8802 against discrimination in defence employment.
4. New Deal exclusions weakened protection. Agricultural and domestic workers lacked key labour and Social Security coverage.
   1. Political alignment changed despite limits. Many northern Black voters moved toward Democrats because access and influence appeared greater than under Republicans.

Business and conservative opposition grew

1. Employers challenged the Wagner Act. They argued that the NLRB favoured unions and interfered with managerial authority.
2. The Supreme Court upheld the Act in 1937. NLRB v Jones and Laughlin Steel confirmed federal power over labour relations affecting interstate commerce.
3. Southern Democrats resisted national standards. Low-wage regional economic interests shaped exclusions and enforcement.
4. The conservative coalition restricted further reform after 1938. Republicans and southern Democrats blocked additional labour expansion.
   1. The policy settlement remained incomplete. The New Deal strengthened unions but left later governments to define or reduce those rights.

Direct action and political consequence shaped the outcome

1. The Flint sit-down strike tested industrial unionism. General Motors workers occupied plants in 1936 and 1937, preventing production and replacement labour. Their victory helped the United Auto Workers secure recognition across a major mass-production industry.
2. New Deal labour policy changed political coalitions. Organized workers became a central part of the Democratic alliance, while many business leaders moved toward conservative opposition. Labour rights therefore reshaped party politics as well as workplace power.

Historians debate protection and dependency

1. Liberal interpretations stress institutional security. They view collective bargaining, Social Security, and wage-hour law as foundations of modern economic citizenship.
2. Labour historians stress worker agency. Strikes, occupations, and organizing forced politicians to convert promises into enforceable rights.
3. Race and gender historians stress exclusion. They show how programme design protected many industrial workers while leaving other labour categories vulnerable.
4. Conservative interpretations stress market rigidity. They argue that union power, payroll taxes, and regulation could slow hiring or investment.
   1. A balanced judgement compares access with coverage. Reforms were lasting, but their benefits depended on occupation, race, gender, region, and union strength.

Paper 3 preparation