IB Global Politics Paper 2 Guide
- Paper 2 is an essay-based paper where:
- Same for SL and HL
- Duration: 1 hour 45 minutes
- Marks: 30
- Weighting:
- 40% (SL)
- 30% (HL)
- Format: Extended essay responses.
- These questions require conceptual understanding, evaluation of political issues, and the use of relevant examples.
Structure
- Two Sections:
- Section A → Questions from each of the thematic studies
- Rights & Justice
- Development & Sustainability
- Peace & Conflict
- Section B → Integrating questions.
- Require connections across the three themes + the core topic (Power, Sovereignty & International Relations).
- Section A → Questions from each of the thematic studies
- Answer one question from each section.

What’s Assessed
- Conceptual understanding of key political ideas
- Ability to synthesize, justify, and evaluate arguments
- Use of examples, counterclaims, and political theory
- Marks are awarded for:
- Relevant political concepts and prescribed content
- Examples (real-world or theoretical)
- Justified arguments
- Balanced structure and evaluation of counterclaims
Command Terms to Know
- Describe: Give a detailed account
- Define: Give the precise meaning
- Identify: Provide an answer from options
- Outline: Give a brief summary
- Analyze: Break down key elements
- Distinguish: Highlight differences
- Explain: Give reasons or causes
- Suggest: Propose a solution or idea
- Section A: Thematic Questions
- Development
- To what extent do international financial institutions such as the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank promote development rather than deepen inequality?
- Evaluate the effectiveness of sustainable development goals (SDGs) in addressing poverty.
- Peace & Conflict
- “Peacekeeping operations are more effective at maintaining peace than creating it.” Discuss with reference to examples.
- To what extent are structural causes more important than cultural causes in explaining the outbreak of conflict?
- Rights & Justice
- Evaluate the claim that cultural relativism undermines the universality of human rights.
- To what extent are international courts and tribunals effective in delivering global justice?
- Development
- Section B: Integrating Questions
- To what extent does the pursuit of peace depend on achieving justice?
- Evaluate the claim that sustainable development is impossible without the protection of human rights.
- Discuss the extent to which sovereignty limits progress in development, justice, and peacebuilding.
- To what extent can global governance institutions balance state sovereignty with human rights and sustainable development?
Structure of an Essay
- Introduction
- Define key terms
- Identify the question type and core concept
- Brief outline of argument
- Main Body - Use PEEL in each paragraph:
- Point: Clear topic sentence
- Evidence: Real-world examples, theories, or case studies
- Explanation: Why/how your point supports your thesis
- Link: Connect to next paragraph or main question
- Include counterclaims to strengthen your argument:
- Use phrases like:
“On the other hand…”, “An alternative to this is…”, “It must be admitted that…” - Then argue against them with evidence
- Reassert your claim
- Use phrases like:
- Conclusion
- Clearly answer the question
- Weigh claims vs. counterclaims
- Leave the reader with a clear judgment
- How to Organize Paragraphs
- Option 1: All claims first, then counterclaims
- Option 2: Alternate claim and counterclaim paragraphs
- Markband Highlights (Top-Level)
- Answer is well-structured and addresses the question
- Shows in-depth understanding with integrated examples
- Arguments are clear, coherent, and compelling
- Counterclaims are explored and evaluated
- Know your key political concepts well
- Use real-world case studies and theoretical perspectives
- Always justify and evaluate your arguments
- Stay clear, concise, and structured
Markbands for Paper Two
0 Marks
- The work does not reach a standard described by any of the descriptors below.
1–5 Marks
- Limited understanding of the demands of the question.
- Poorly structured or lacks a clear essay structure.
- Minimal focus on the task.
- Little relevant knowledge, examples are lacking or irrelevant.


