IB Global Politics: Paper 1 Guide on How to Succeed
Why Paper 1 matters
- Paper 1 is where you show your skills with sources, not just your memory. Unlike Paper 2 or the engagement activity, it isn’t about long essays or case studies. Instead, it tests how well you can:
- Read and interpret sources quickly (text, charts, images).
- Apply political theories and concepts to real material.
- Think critically under time pressure.
- Paper 1 is a source-based assessment lasting 75 minutes, and it is a compulsory exam for both SL and HL students. The paper focuses on one of the four core units:
- Power, Sovereignty and International Relations
- Human Rights
- Development
- Peace and Conflict
- You will be presented with four different sources, which may include written texts, images, diagrams, or graphs.
- These will be accompanied by four questions, each targeting a distinct assessment objective (AO). You must answer all four questions.
Weighting:
- 30% at SL
- 20% at HL
Key Exam Strategy: Read with Purpose
- Before reading the sources, read through all four questions. This helps you:
- Know what to look for in each source
- Read critically with the assessment objectives in mind
- Save time and avoid confusion later on
Question 1: Knowledge and Understanding (AO1)
- Marks: 3
- Suggested time: 5 minutes
Skills required:
- Show understanding of key political concepts and global issues.
- Show understanding of source material.
Common command terms:
- Describe: Give a detailed account
- Define: Give the exact meaning of a term or concept
- Identify: Choose the correct answer from a list of options
- Outline: Give a brief summary
- Based on extracting info from a source (text, image, or statistics).
- Put into your own words to show understanding.
- Aim for about 5 lines in your answer.
Question 2: Application and Analysis (AO2)
- Marks: 4
- Suggested time: 15 minutes
Skills required:
- Apply political concepts to analyse the issue in context
- Use evidence from the source and your own knowledge
- Present an argument with support
Common command terms:
- Analyze: Break down and explain the key elements
- Distinguish: Highlight differences between concepts
- Explain: Give reasons or causes
- Suggest: Propose a reasoned solution or hypothesis
- Use both the source content and your own understanding
- Support with examples where possible
- Aim for approximately 200–250 words
- Focus on analysis, not just description
Question 3: Synthesis and Evaluation (AO3 + AO4)
- Marks: 8
- Suggested time: 20 minutes
Skills required:
- Compare, contrast, and evaluate multiple sources and perspectives
- Examine bias, reliability, and relevance
- Structure a logical and coherent response
Common command terms:
- Compare and contrast: Highlight similarities and differences
- Contrast: Focus on differences
- Compare: Focus on similarities
- Use at least two sources equally
- Use phrases like: “While Source A suggests..., Source B offers a contrasting view...”
- Comment on the type and origin of each source (e.g., media article vs UN report)
- Aim for a minimum of 300 words
- Make four clear points to target full marks
Question 4: Extended Response (AO3 + AO4)
- Marks: 10
- Suggested time: 35 minutes
Skills required:
- Construct a mini-essay using source material and background knowledge
- Evaluate arguments and counterarguments
- Demonstrate the ability to use sources to support your analysis
Common command terms:
- Discuss: Provide a balanced review with multiple perspectives
- Evaluate: Weigh up strengths and limitations
- Examine: Explore assumptions and interrelationships
- Aim for at least 600 words
- Use both sources and your own knowledge
- Define key terms (e.g., globalisation, sovereignty, power)
- Provide examples and counterclaims to show balance and evaluation
- Keep introductions and conclusions brief and focused
Final Reminders:
- Manage your time carefully to give each question appropriate attention
- Refer to sources thoroughly, especially in Questions 3 and 4
- Structure your answers clearly and logically
- Always evaluate – include alternative perspectives or counterarguments to strengthen your analysis


