Spoilers: Actors who benefit from continued conflict.
Cultural Differences: Misunderstandings can hinder dialogue.
Example
In the Syrian Civil War, peacemaking efforts have been complicated by multiple actors with conflicting interests, including regional powers and non-state groups.
Case study
The Oslo Accords
Background: A series of agreements between Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) in the 1990s.
Key Features:
Negotiation: Direct talks between Israeli and Palestinian leaders.
Mediation: Norway played a crucial role as a mediator.
Outcomes: Established a framework for Palestinian self-governance, but failed to resolve key issues like borders and refugees.
Note
The Oslo Accords highlight both the potential and limitations of peacemaking, as the conflict remains unresolved.
Theoretical Perspectives on Peacemaking
Realism
Focuses on power dynamics and state interests.
Peacemaking is seen as a strategic tool to achieve stability.
Liberalism
Emphasizes the role of international institutions and cooperation.
Peacemaking is facilitated by norms, treaties, and diplomacy.
Constructivism
Highlights the importance of identities, norms, and discourse.
Peacemaking involves changing perceptions and building trust.
The Role of International Organizations
United Nations
Provides mediation and diplomatic support.
Examples: UN-led peace talks in Yemen.
Regional Organizations
African Union, European Union, etc.
Play a crucial role in regional conflicts.
Example
The African Union's mediation in the Sudanese peace process demonstrates the importance of regional organizations in peacemaking.
Identify a recent peacemaking effort and analyze the role of third parties in the process.
What challenges did they face?
Exam technique
Paper 1 (Source-Based, 1h15m, 25 marks)
For Q1 (3m), identify the specific peacemaking actors, processes, or agreements described in the source.
For Q2 (4m), explain how the source shows peacemaking in action - link to mediation, negotiation, track-two diplomacy, or peace agreements.
For Q3 (6m), compare how sources evaluate peacemaking - one as successful diplomacy, another highlighting exclusions or power imbalances.
For Q4 (12m), evaluate whether peacemaking addresses root causes or merely freezes conflict, using sources AND examples like Colombia FARC or Dayton Accords.
Paper 2 (Extended Essay, 1h45m, 30 marks)
Section A: Analyze specific peace processes with concrete details on actors, terms, and implementation.
Section B: Connect to themes like justice vs. peace, sovereignty, rights, or inclusion.
Top band (13-15) requires diverse perspectives - whose peace? Examine gender, minority, and victim perspectives on peace agreements.
Paper 3 - HL Only (Stimulus-Based, 1h30m, 28 marks)
For Q1 (3m), analyse how the stimulus reveals peacemaking dynamics in a specific conflict.
For Q2b (6m), recommend peacemaking approaches that ensure inclusivity while managing spoiler threats.
For Q3 (15m), synthesize case studies of peace processes to identify what factors make agreements durable.