Pigouvian Taxes
Pigouvian taxes
Form of tax imposed on activities that generate negative externalities.
- Pigouvian Tax is a method used by governments to correct negative externalities as:
- It makes the production of the good for a firm more expensive (increases costs of production).
- Hence, this causes a decrease in production of the good (moves the curve towards allocative efficiency.
In the diagram above, the following is observed:
- An upward shift of the MPC curve towards the MSC curve.
- This will decrease the production or quantity from $Q_m$ until it reaches the socially optimum level $Q_{opt}$.
- In order to correct the externality fully, the tax has to be equal to the externality.
- Otherwise, the MPC will be closer to, but not at MSC, leading to a lower externality and market failure.
Carbon Taxes
Carbon Tax
A carbon tax is a tax which is imposed on per unit of carbon emitted.
- With carbon emissions being one of the most pressing environmental issues nowadays, carbon taxes are induced to combat the issue.
- This tax makes it more expensive to use fossil fuels which emit carbon, as the quantity of emissions are taxed, leading to higher costs of production.
- Therefore, firms decrease their use of fossil fuels by switching to alternatives, which helps preserves the environment.
Observing the diagram above:
- The introduction of a carbon tax helps shift the MPC curve to the MSC curve.
- However, as there are alternatives to carbon emitting fossil fuels, which do not get affected from carbon tax, a lot of firms may switch to those alternatives.
- Hence, firms still pollute the environment, but by a lower factor, which is represented by the shift from $MSC_1$ to $MSC_2$
- Therefore the externality may not be fully corrected, but rather reduced.
When a carbon tax is imposed, the more the firm emits carbon, the higher the tax the firm will pay.
Tradable Permits
Tradable Permits
A legal cap set by the government, limiting the amount of emissions that can be emitted. Each firm are provided a set of permits, which can be exchanged with other firms.
- In search of tackling pollution, governments can use tradable permits:
- The government will decide its acceptable amount of pollution per period, and divide it into a number of permits
- As a result each firm will be given its own limit, above which, if the firm pollutes, they will be penalised.
- However, firms can buy or sell these permits to other the firms who are interested, at a price determined by market forces.
- Normally, firms sell permits when they pollute below their cap limit.
- Further, firms buy permits when they pollute above their cap limit.
- Therefore, tradable permits are known as a market-based policy to reduce negative externalities.
Figure 3 above represents the market for tradable permits. As can be seen:
- The quantity of permits is fixed at $Q_{tp}$, and the supply is perfectly inelastic because the amount of tradable permits available is fixed by the government.
- Initially for a firm to have a pollution permit, they need to pay price $P_1$.
- However as the economy's production, pollution will likely increase too. Resultantly, the demand for extra tradable permits will increase, shifting the demand curve to the right ($D_1 \rightarrow D_2$).
- This increase in demand, with a fixed supply, increases considerable the price for extra pollution permits ($P_1 \rightarrow P_2$).
- Therefore, those firms that produce more will have to pay a much higher price for extra pollution permits from other firms.
- This encourages encourages to reduce their pollution to:
- Save costs by not having to buy extra tradable permits.
- Increase revenue by selling their spare tradable permits to other firms.
By imposing taxes or tradable permits, the governments force the producing firms to internalise the tax, which reduces their incentive to pollute.
Government Legislation and Regulation
- Government legislation typically involves the following approaches:
- Emission stadards
- Emission license
- State protected, emission free zones
- Limitations of production size
- As a result, observing the diagram, the government will decrease the production of the goods which are created using pollution emitting activities and shift the MPC curve upwards, closer to the MSC curve at the social optimal level of production.
- These type of approaches can be effective in dealing with negative externalities, as the law can ban certain undesirable activities.
- Legislation can be very effective and once in effect, it can work very fast to deal with the negative externalities.
While legislation can be a quick way of fixing negative externalities:
- The government needs to spend resources to make sure these rules are followed.
- These includes hiring staff to supervise and monitor firms.
- The tax revenue utilised for the staff's salary, could be a high opportunity cost, which could be used for alternative cases such as healthcare and education.
Collective Self-Governance
Collective self-governance
The situation where a common pool resources are given to the control of individuals for them to manage it in a sustainable manner.
This approach suggests that if the users of a resource are fully in control of the resource, they will work collaboratively to manage it, as they know if they fail to manage, their future use of the resource will be endangered.
NoteHowever:
- There has to be a good communication between all the users of the resource.
- Otherwise the approach will fail, as there will not be efficient cooperation.
- Further, common pool resources which don't have boundaries such as oceans, are very hard to self-govern due to its scale.
Education and Awareness Creation
- Education and awareness creation about the activities that generate negative externalities help nudge firms to change their consumption/production patterns.
- This can help reduce the negative externalities.
- Therefore, the MPC curve will be shifted upwards towards the MSC curve.
International Agreements
- While the negative externalities can be emitted by one country, the effect of it can be felt globally.
- For example the depletion of ozone layer, which is damaged by the release of greenhouse gases, protects Earth from ultraviolet radiation.
- Therefore, international agreements need to be made to monitor and correct these externalities to reduce the negative effects on the international environment (for everyone).
Case Study: The Montreal Protocol (1987)
The Montreal Protocol is a landmark international treaty aimed at protecting the Earth's ozone layer by phasing out the production and use of ozone-depleting substances (ODS) such as chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and halons.
Ozone Depletion and Economic Implications
In the 1970s and 1980s, scientists identified that chemicals like CFCs, widely used in refrigeration, air conditioning, and aerosol sprays, were causing significant harm to the ozone layer. The ozone layer plays a critical role in blocking harmful ultraviolet (UV) radiation from the sun, and its degradation posed severe global risks. These risks included increased healthcare costs due to skin cancer and cataracts, loss of agricultural productivity, and ecosystem disruption, all of which had potential negative externalities and significant economic impacts on both developed and developing nations.
Global Economic Challenges and Solutions
The degradation of the ozone layer represented a global public goods issue, requiring international cooperation to mitigate. The Montreal Protocol addressed this challenge by:
- Establishing legally binding targets to reduce the production and use of ODS, with specific timelines for countries to comply.
- Providing financial incentives and assistance to developing countries through mechanisms like the Multilateral Fund to ensure a just transition to safer alternatives.
- Facilitating the development of substitute technologies and market innovations, fostering economic opportunities in the production of environmentally friendly alternatives.
International Cooperation and Success
Initially signed by 24 countries in 1987, the Montreal Protocol has since achieved universal adoption by over 190 nations, making it one of the most successful examples of international policy coordination. This widespread adoption highlights the ability to overcome coordination failures often associated with collective action problems.
Economic and Environmental Impact
- Reduction in ODS Production and Consumption
The Protocol has led to a dramatic reduction in ODS production. This decrease is an example of how regulatory frameworks and economic incentives can be used to correct market failures associated with negative externalities. - Economic Benefits of Ozone Recovery
- Healthcare Savings: The reduction of UV radiation has prevented millions of cases of skin cancer and cataracts, leading to lower healthcare expenditures.
- Agricultural Productivity: By reducing UV exposure, the Protocol has safeguarded crop yields and livelihoods, particularly in vulnerable economies.
- Innovation and New Markets: The phasing out of ODS spurred technological advancements in refrigeration and manufacturing industries, creating new growth opportunities.
- Financial Support for Developing Countries
Recognizing the disparities in economic development, the Protocol included provisions for financial aid to developing nations, enabling them to transition without placing undue burdens on their economies. This reflects the application of equity principles in global policy-making. - Monitoring Illegal Trade
Despite its success, challenges persist, particularly with the illegal trade of banned substances, which undermine the Protocol's achievements. Governments and international organizations continue to invest in monitoring mechanisms to address this issue.
Long-Term Outcomes
The Montreal Protocol is credited with the ongoing recovery of the ozone layer, projected to return to pre-1980 levels by the mid-21st century. This recovery demonstrates the effectiveness of multilateral agreements in achieving sustainable development goals (SDGs), specifically SDG 13: Climate Action and SDG 3: Good Health and Well-being.
Evaluation
The Montreal Protocol serves as a model of global collaboration in addressing a market failure with international ramifications. By aligning economic incentives with environmental goals, it illustrates how externalities can be mitigated through coordinated policy interventions. The Protocol highlights the importance of scientific research, financial mechanisms, and institutional frameworks in tackling complex global challenges.
Subsidies
- By providing subsidies the government can help firms which produce negative production externalities such as carbon emissions or toxic chemical emissions, to shift towards more sustainable approaches such as solar energy which may be expensive.
- By doing this, the government will decrease the quantity of pollutants and shift the MPC curve towards the MSC curve, and the socially optimal level $Q_{opt}$.
Government Provision
- Governments may decide to provide certain goods/services themselves in order to address the market failures caused by the market firms in their competitive setting.
- By doing this, the governments will ensure the accessibility of goods and correct the inefficiencies and externalities created by private firms.
- Goods/services that can be provided by the government to correct those externalities include:
- Public healthcare
- Education
- Clean energy sources


