Patterns Turn Specific Examples Into Mathematical Structure
- Mathematics often begins with noticing something repeats or grows in a regular way.
- A pattern is an observable regularity (in numbers, shapes, or relationships).
- When you describe that regularity in a way that works beyond the examples you started with, you are making a generalization.
Generalization
A general statement or rule made on the basis of specific examples.
- In the IB MYP, generalizing is not just about "spotting the next term".
- It is about using logic to create and validate rules that can become part of a mathematical model.
- Done well, generalizations help you solve complicated problems by considering a more general case first.
- A generalization in mathematics should come with a reason (why it works) and evidence (testing).
- A pattern you notice is a starting point, not a proof.
Conjectures Are Testable Claims Suggested By Patterns
When you think you have found a rule, you usually express it first as a conjecture.
Conjecture
A statement that appears to be true based on observed examples, but has not yet been proven.
Conjectures are essential because they turn noticing into doing:
- you predict what should happen for the next case,
- you test the prediction on new cases,
- you revise the conjecture or work toward a proof.
- Trying a few cases can make a conjecture feel certain, but it can still be false.
- Mathematical generalizations are powerful, and risky, if you do not test and justify them.
Representations Help You See And Communicate Relationships
- In MYP mathematics, a key idea is that relationships are connections and associations between properties, objects, people, and ideas.
- A pattern is one kind of relationship, and representation is how you show it clearly.
Representation
The manner in which information or a relationship is presented (for example, a table, graph, diagram, equation, or written rule).
Different representations reveal different features:
- A table is good for spotting changes from one step to the next.
- A diagram can reveal geometric structure.
- A graph highlights trends and rates of change.
- An algebraic rule is compact and works for any input.
- If you are stuck finding a rule, change representation.
- Many patterns become obvious only after you put them into a table or draw them.
A Reliable Process For Generalizing Patterns
A disciplined approach reduces the risk of incorrect generalizations.
- Generate examples: compute or draw the first few cases accurately.
- Organize: make a table (input $n$, output value) and look for structure.
- Describe the pattern: use words first (what changes each step?).
- Conjecture a rule: write an algebraic expression in terms of $n$.
- Test on new cases: check values you did not use to create the rule.
- Justify: explain why the rule must work (a proof or a convincing argument).
- In assessment tasks, marks often come from the process: clear examples, a table, a stated conjecture, and testing.
- Even if the final rule is wrong, good reasoning can earn substantial credit.
Common Pattern Types You Should Recognise Quickly
Linear Patterns Have A Constant First Difference
- A linear pattern changes by the same amount each step.
- If the sequence is $3, 7, 11, 15, \dots$, the differences are $+4, +4, +4, \dots$ so a rule has the form $an+b$.
- To find $a$ and $b$:
- the common difference is $a$,
- substitute any term to find $b$.
- For the example, $a=4$.
- Using $n=1$ gives $4(1)+b=3$ so $b=-1$.
- So the general term is $u_n = 4n-1$.
Quadratic Patterns Have Constant Second Differences
If first differences are not constant, check second differences.
$$1, 4, 9, 16, 25, \dots \quad \text{ (square numbers)}$$
- first differences: $3,5,7,9,\dots$ (not constant)
- second differences: $2,2,2,\dots$ (constant)
- A quadratic rule has the form $an^2+bn+c$.
- Here the pattern is well-known: $$u_n=n^2$$
Constant second difference indicates a quadratic relationship, but you still need to find the specific rule.
Geometric Patterns Multiply By A Constant Factor
If each term is obtained by multiplying by the same number, the pattern is geometric.
$2, 6, 18, 54, \dots$ multiplies by $3$, so $u_n = 2\cdot 3^{n-1}$.
Classify each pattern and suggest a rule:
- $5, 9, 13, 17, \dots$
- $1, 8, 27, 64, \dots$
- $81, 27, 9, 3, \dots$
A Famous Cautionary Example: Regions Formed By Joining Dots On A Circle
A classic exploration shows why it is risky to generalize from a small number of cases.
- You place $n$ dots on the circumference of a circle and connect every pair of dots with a straight line segment (a chord).
- The chords divide the circle into regions.
- Let $r$ be the number of regions.
From careful drawings:
- $n=1 \Rightarrow r=1$
- $n=2 \Rightarrow r=2$
- $n=3 \Rightarrow r=4$
- $n=4 \Rightarrow r=8$
- $n=5 \Rightarrow r=16$
A table makes the pattern tempting:
| $n$ (dots) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $r$ (regions) | 1 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 16 |
It looks like the number of regions doubles each time, so you might conjecture: $$r = 2^{n-1}$$
Testing The Conjecture Matters
- If the conjecture were correct, then for $n=6$ you would predict $r=32$.
- However, when you actually draw the $n=6$ case carefully (ensuring that no three chords cross at the same interior point), you get: $$r = 31$$
- So the simple doubling rule is false, even though it fits perfectly for $n=1$ to $5$.
- This example shows a key risk: a rule can match many early cases and still fail later.
- Always test beyond the data you used to create the conjecture.
What Went Wrong With "Doubling"?
- The early drawings create a doubling illusion because each new dot creates many new intersections, and intersections control how regions increase.
- The number of intersections does not grow in a way that keeps exact doubling forever.
- There is a correct general formula for this problem, but it is not obvious.
- It comes from graph theory and connects vertices, edges, and regions (related to Euler's formula).
- Generalizing from small cases is like predicting a movie's ending from the first five minutes.
- Sometimes the pattern continues, but a plot twist can break it.
- Testing further is how you detect the twist.
Generalizing Relationships Beyond Mathematics
- Mathematical generalization also supports modeling in other subjects because it clarifies trends among individuals and systems.
- For example, in biology, organisms coexist through ecological relationships that can be:
- oppositional (such as predation or competition),
- symbiotic (one organism lives in or on another), sometimes mutualistic (both benefit).
- You might observe several examples of mutualism and generalize "both organisms benefit".
- But biology also includes cases where one benefits and the other is harmed, so generalizations must be made with care, clear definitions, and awareness of exceptions.
Generalizing is a cycle of reasoning:
- observe and represent a relationship,
- conjecture a rule,
- test and refine,
- justify with logic.
This is how mathematics builds dependable models from simple examples.
- In one sentence, explain the difference between a pattern and a generalization.
- Why is testing a conjecture on new cases important?
- In the circle-regions problem, what value of $r$ for $n=6$ disproves the doubling conjecture?