Practice Ethical decision-making and responsibility with authentic MYP MYP History exam questions for both SL and HL students. This question bank mirrors Paper 1, 2, 3 structure, covering key topics like historical sources, cause and effect, and continuity and change. Get instant solutions, detailed explanations, and build exam confidence with questions in the style of MYP examiners.
In the case study of Harriet Tubman, how did her repeated ethical decisions specifically affect the Underground Railroad beyond freeing individuals?
According to the 'Exam Technique' advice in the textbook, what four components should be included when explaining an individual's ethical decision in a historical context?
In the context of 1930s Europe, how does the textbook describe the motivation behind Neville Chamberlain’s decision to negotiate with Hitler?
Beyond initiating the Montgomery Bus Boycott, what broader historical impact does the textbook attribute to Rosa Parks' refusal to give up her seat?
Which of the following best explains why Malala Yousafzai’s decision to continue speaking out after the 2012 attack is considered an ethical action?
Imagine history as a complex machine. The large-scale social and economic forces are the fuel and engine that drive the machine forward. The cogs are the individuals who follow established patterns without question. The levers represent the ethical choices made by individuals, which have the potential to change the machine's direction or operation.
In the provided analogy comparing history to a machine, what represents the role of ethical choices?
True or False: According to the 'Warning' section, historians should focus exclusively on the ethical choices of famous leaders to understand historical change.
What defines an ethical choice in a historical context?
When analyzing a historical ethical choice, why is it considered a mistake to focus solely on the final action taken?
According to the textbook, when laws are perceived as fundamentally unjust, what is the role of individual ethical choices?
Practice Ethical decision-making and responsibility with authentic MYP MYP History exam questions for both SL and HL students. This question bank mirrors Paper 1, 2, 3 structure, covering key topics like historical sources, cause and effect, and continuity and change. Get instant solutions, detailed explanations, and build exam confidence with questions in the style of MYP examiners.
In the case study of Harriet Tubman, how did her repeated ethical decisions specifically affect the Underground Railroad beyond freeing individuals?
According to the 'Exam Technique' advice in the textbook, what four components should be included when explaining an individual's ethical decision in a historical context?
In the context of 1930s Europe, how does the textbook describe the motivation behind Neville Chamberlain’s decision to negotiate with Hitler?
Beyond initiating the Montgomery Bus Boycott, what broader historical impact does the textbook attribute to Rosa Parks' refusal to give up her seat?
Which of the following best explains why Malala Yousafzai’s decision to continue speaking out after the 2012 attack is considered an ethical action?
Imagine history as a complex machine. The large-scale social and economic forces are the fuel and engine that drive the machine forward. The cogs are the individuals who follow established patterns without question. The levers represent the ethical choices made by individuals, which have the potential to change the machine's direction or operation.
In the provided analogy comparing history to a machine, what represents the role of ethical choices?
True or False: According to the 'Warning' section, historians should focus exclusively on the ethical choices of famous leaders to understand historical change.
What defines an ethical choice in a historical context?
When analyzing a historical ethical choice, why is it considered a mistake to focus solely on the final action taken?
According to the textbook, when laws are perceived as fundamentally unjust, what is the role of individual ethical choices?