Communities of Knowers Are Filters of Knowledge
- Communities of knowers are groups that decide what counts as knowledge.
- They control what gets created, what gets believed, and what gets ignored.
- Think of them as filters that stand between raw information and accepted knowledge.
- When you hear "people think," ask yourself:
- Which people?
- Why do they think that?
- This stops you from making vague generalizations.
What Are Communities of Knowers?
These are groups that influence how knowledge gets made, tested, and spread.
- They exist everywhere:
- Scientific research teams studying climate change
- Cultural groups preserving traditions
- Wikipedia editors updating articles
- Medical professionals setting treatment standards
- Social media influencers shaping opinions
- TikTok creators discussing mental health form a community of knowers.
- They decide what mental health advice gets millions of views and what gets ignored.
- Their algorithms and engagement patterns filter knowledge for Gen Z.
Three Ways Communities Control Knowledge
- From the moment someone asks a question to the moment that knowledge reaches your phone, communities are making decisions that determine what you get to know.
- These decisions happen in three key stages, which show you how communities filter reality and why different groups can have such different versions of the "truth."
1. Knowledge Creation
- Communities don't just discover knowledge sitting around waiting to be found, they actively decide what's worth investigating in the first place.
- Think about it: there are infinite questions you could ask about the world but communities have limited time, money, and attention, so they have to choose.
- These choices aren't neutral.
- They reflect what the community values, fear, and what they think will benefit them.
- The process works like this:
- Communities identify problems they care about
- They decide which methods are acceptable for solving them
- They allocate resources (money, people, time) to certain questions
- They ignore other questions completely
- Questions that don't fit the community's priorities therefore get left out.
- Consider game gevelopment
- Indie game developers: Create games about personal stories and social issues.
- AAA game studios: Create games about action and marketability.
- These are different communities that produce different games and therefore different knowledge about what makes a game meaningful.
2. Knowledge Validation
- Creating knowledge is only half the battle because getting it accepted as true is the other half.
- Every community has different standards for what counts as reliable evidence and these standards aren't universal laws, but social agreements about what the community will trust.
- The validation process determines:
- What evidence is considered acceptable
- Who has the authority to judge that evidence
- What procedures must be followed
- How disagreements get resolved
- Some communities value tradition and authority, some value experimentation and data.
- Some communities value practical results. Some communities value logical consistency.
- None of these approaches is automatically better.
- They just reflect what each community thinks matters most.
- Scientific community: Uses peer review - other experts check your work.
- Business community: Uses profit results - if it makes money, it works.
- Religious community: Uses scripture and tradition - ancient texts provide validation.
3. Knowledge Sharing
- Even after knowledge is created and validated, communities still control who gets access to it.
- This is about how knowledge is packaged for different audiences and controlling how it gets interpreted.
- Communities make decisions about:
- What language to use (technical vs. simple)
- What format to use (papers vs. videos vs. infographics)
- What price to charge (free vs. expensive)
- Which platforms to use (journals vs. social media vs. conferences)
- What details to include or leave out
- These decisions shape:
- Who can understand the knowledge
- How quickly it spreads
- How accurately it gets transmitted
- What actions people take based on it
- Take the academic journal to palatable content pipeline:
- Academic journals: Original study published in Nature Neuroscience - "Hippocampal sharp-wave ripples during NREM sleep facilitate consolidation of declarative memory traces through coordinated reactivation patterns"
- Pop science book: Author reads 50 studies, writes Why We Sleep - "Sleep helps your brain file away memories like organizing a library"
- Health blog: Writer reads the book, posts "7 Sleep Hacks to Boost Your Memory" - focuses on practical tips, removes scientific uncertainty
- YouTube video: "sleep like a baby tonight!" - clickbait title, dramatic music, oversimplified claims
Four Types of Community Influence
- Professional Communities: Doctors, lawyers, engineers - groups with formal training and official standards.
- Cultural Communities: Religious groups, ethnic communities, regional populations - groups sharing traditions and values.
- Digital Communities: Reddit forums, Discord servers, TikTok creators - groups forming around shared interests online.
- Academic Communities: University researchers, scholarly journals, conference attendees - groups focused on formal knowledge creation.
- Always Name the Community in your TOK essays and exhibitions.
- Say which community established those facts and why that matters.
- This shows you understand how knowledge actually works.
- Understand that communities can have collective blind spots.
- Knowledge never exists in a vacuum.
- They can be influenced by money, politics, or cultural assumptions.
- Think of a controversial topic you have an opinion about
- Can you identify which communities of knowers have influenced your position?
- What methods do they use to validate knowledge?
- Can you think of a time when you changed your mind about something after learning it came from a different community than you originally thought
- What does this reveal about how communities shape knowledge?