Evaluating Human Performance Tests
Types of Performance Testing Environments
Field Tests
- Conducted in real-world sporting environments
- Generally more sport-specific and practical
- Lower cost and more accessible
- Examples include:
- Beep test for cardiovascular endurance
- Illinois Agility Test for agility and speed
- Standing broad jump for power assessment
Field tests are excellent for team testing scenarios and when laboratory equipment isn't available.
Laboratory Tests
- Performed in controlled environments
- More precise measurements and data collection
- Typically requires specialized equipment
- Examples include:
- VO2max testing on treadmill/cycle ergometer
- Wingate test for anaerobic power
- Isokinetic dynamometry for strength assessment
Laboratory tests often provide more detailed data but may lack sport-specific relevance.
Intensity Levels in Performance Testing
Sub-maximal Tests
- Performed below maximum effort (typically 75-85%)
- Safer for untrained individuals
- Less physically demanding
- Examples include:
- Astrand-Rhyming cycle test
- PWC170 test
- Step tests
Sub-maximal tests are great for predicting maximal performance without pushing participants to their limits.
Maximal Tests
- Require 100% effort
- More accurate measurements of maximum capacity
- Higher risk and requires medical supervision
- Examples include:
- Direct VO2max testing
- 1RM strength tests
- Maximal anaerobic power tests
Don't conduct maximal tests without proper screening and safety protocols in place.
Evaluating Test Selection
Advantages and Limitations
Field Tests
Advantages:
- Sport-specific
