The Japanese Invasion of Manchuria and Northern China (1931) - Events
The Mukden Incident (September 1931)
- In September 1931, the Kwantung Army occupied Manchuria.
- The trigger was the Mukden Incident, the blowing up of part of the South Manchurian Railway.
- In reality, the sabotage had been staged by the Kwantung Army, but they blamed it on the Chinese.
- The takeover of Manchuria was a decision taken by Kwantung army officers stationed in Manchuria but the Japanese government had not authorized it and sought to limit the Kwantung army’s intervention.
- The official reason for the invasion was one of “self defense”, as it was claimed that the Chinese had blown up the railway.
- In February 1932, the Japanese proclaimed the new state of Manchukuo.
- Nominally, it was an independent state, but in practice it wasn´t.
- It was managed by the Kwantung Army and operated as a puppet state controlled by Japan.
- To make it look legitimate, the Japanese appointed Pu Yi, the deposed last emperor of the Qing dynasty, as the head of state.
- The South Manchurian Railway (SMR) was owned and operated by Japan.
- It had been built by Russia, but transferred to Japan after Russia lost the Russo-Japanese war (1904-5) through the Treaty of Portsmouth.
- By 1931, it had grown into a massive company, functioning not just as a railway but also operating coal mines, ports, and various industrial and commercial ventures in Manchuria.
- In Paper 1, there can be sources that show contrasting opinions in Japan on the invasion of Manchuria.
- This is expected because of the tensions between the government and the Kwantung Army, that operated in a fairly independent way.
- The important thing to keep in mind is that Japan did not act as a block, and that the Kwantung made and enacted political and military decisions on foreign policy.
- The taking over of Manchuria will also make the Kwantung Army more powerful in the domestic arena in Japan.
The Japanese Invasion of Manchuria and Northern China (1931) - Responses
1. The League of Nations' Response
- With the proclamation of Manchukuo, Chiang Kai-Shek, the leader of China, appealed to the League of Nations arguing that Japan had violated China's sovereignty.
- But because Japan was a permanent member of the security council of the League, they vetoed a resolution from the League urging Japan to withdraw their forces from the area of the South Manchuria Railway.
- In exchange, Japan proposed a commission of inquiry for the Mukden incident.
- The League voted for the conformation of the international Lytton Commission to investigate the case, but its response was slow and ineffective
- The Lytton commission took almost a year to issue its report in October 1932 and its resolutions were very soft on Japan.
- No military or economic sanctions were imposed, partly because Europe was worried of losing trade with Japan, and partly due to the strength of the Kwantung Army.
- Nevertheless, the Lytton report passed recommendations to the League.
- Japan was labeled as the aggressor country, disregarding the “self defense” argument.
- Manchukuo was not recognized as an independent country, but as a puppet state controlled by Japan.
- Japan should negotiate with China through diplomacy to leave Manchuria and reinstate the Chinese government over the region.
- In March 1933, Japan withdrew from the League of Nations, a major blow to the League’s authority.
The Lytton Commission takes its name from its leader, Victor Bulwer-Lytton, 2nd Earl of Lytton (1876-1947), a British diplomat and politician.
- Sometimes the League is seen as an ineffective institution in the case of Manchuria because China was far away from Europe, and was not a main concern.
- Also, because European powers were too worried about the impact of the Great Depression in their own countries to deal with China.
- Nevertheless, a more complete picture shows that the Lytton Commision needed to deal with the fact that after 1911, the Manchurian region had been very unstable, and Chinese government control had been oscillating and limited.
- Also, Chiang Kai Shek was not a popular leader in Europe, because of his nationalistic platform that promised to end foreign influence in China.
- Nor the US or the USSR were part of the League, and that left British and French politicians to lead the League's response to Japan.
- Both were worried about the vulnerability of their colonies in the Far East, and did not have a relevant trade with China, that´s why they were not in favor of pushing economic sanctions on Japan.
- The failure of the League in Manchuria can be useful to study the reasons that explain the emergence of WW2.
- The failure of collective security in China was an important turning point in encouraging further aggression by Axis powers in the 1930s.
- Make sure you take notes of these events if working with Paper 3 Europe Section 15 - Versailles to Berlin: Diplomacy in Europe (1919–1945)
2. The US’ response
- There was some debate over Japan's invasion of Manchuria.
- Henry Stimson, the Secretary of State (Minister of Foreign Affairs), was in favor of implementing economic sanctions on Japan, but this stance was overruled by President Herbert Hoover.
- The US applied the so-called “Stimson Non Recognition Doctrine” in 1932, which meant that the US did not recognize Manchukuo as an independent state.
- In 1935 and 1937 the US passed Neutrality Acts that declared that the US government would stay neutral if neutral countries had military conflicts.
The United States' unwillingness to engage in international crises during the 1930s partly contributed to the hesitant and ineffective responses of Britain and France to acts of aggression by Japan, as well as by Germany and Italy.
- The Manchurian Crisis had a profound impact on the foreign relations of Japan:
- They left the League of Nations.
- The relations with Britain and France were strained, because of the refusal to recognize Manchukuo (even when Britain and France rejected the possibility of economic sanctions on Japan)
- The same happened with the US.


